azsdk-common-apiview-feedback-resolution
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python/.github/skills/azsdk-common-apiview-feedback-resolution/SKILL.md
Analyze and resolve APIView review feedback on Azure SDK PRs. **UTILITY SKILL**. USE FOR: APIView comments, API review feedback, SDK API surface changes. DO NOT USE FOR: general code review, non-APIView feedback. INVOKES: azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_apiview_get_comments, azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_customized_code_update, azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_typespec_delegate_apiview_feedback, azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_run_typespec_validation, azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_package_generate_code.
What's in it
- APIView Feedback Resolution
- Triggers
- Rules
- MCP Tools
- Steps
- Examples
- Troubleshooting
--- name: azsdk-common-apiview-feedback-resolution license: MIT metadata: version: "1.0.0" distribution: shared description: "Analyze and resolve APIView review feedback on Azure SDK PRs. **UTILITY SKILL**. USE FOR: APIView comments, API review feedback, SDK API surface changes. DO NOT USE FOR: general code review, non-APIView feedback. INVOKES: azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_apiview_get_comments, azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_customized_code_update, azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_typespec_delegate_apiview_feedback, azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_run_typespec_validation, azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_package_generate_code." compatibility: "azure-sdk-mcp server, SDK pull request with APIView review link" --- # APIView Feedback Resolution This skill analyzes and resolves APIView review feedback on Azure SDK pull requests by retrieving reviewer comments, categorizing them, and applying TypeSpec or customization updates that bring the SDK API surface into compliance before re-review. ## Triggers USE FOR: APIView comments, API review feedback, SDK API surface changes WHEN: "resolve APIView comments", "address API review feedback", "update SDK API surface after APIView" DO NOT USE FOR: general code review, non-APIView feedback ## Rules - Requires the `azure-sdk-mcp` server; there is no CLI fallback for retrieving APIView comments or applying TypeSpec changes. - Retrieve and categorize APIView comments before making changes so fixes map to reviewer intent. - Validate, regenerate, build, and test after applying fixes before requesting re-review. ## MCP Tools | Tool | Purpose | | -------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | | `azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_apiview_get_comments` | Get APIView comments | | `azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_customized_code_update` | Apply TypeSpec & code customization changes locally | | `azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_typespec_delegate_apiview_feedback` | Delegate to CCA pipeline | | `azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_run_typespec_validation` | Validate TypeSpec | | `azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_package_generate_code` | Regenerate SDK | ## Steps 1. **Retrieve** — Get APIView URL from SDK PR, run `azsdk_apiview_get_comments`. 2. **Categorize** — Group as Critical/Suggestions/Informational per [feedback steps](references/feedback-resolution-steps.md). 3. **Resolve** — Use `azsdk_customized_code_update` for TypeSpec changes; delegate via `azsdk_typespec_delegate_apiview_feedback` for complex cases. 4. **Validate** — Run validation, regenerate SDK, build and test. 5. **Confirm** — Verify all items addressed. If delegated, follow [post-delegation follow-up](references/feedback-resolution-steps.md#post-delegation-follow-up). Request re-review. ## Examples - "Resolve the APIView comments on my SDK pull request" - "What feedback did the API reviewer leave?" ## Troubleshooting - **No comments**: Verify PR has APIView link and MCP server is connected. - **Validation fails**: Re-run after fixing TypeSpec errors. - **MCP unavailable**: Requires `azure-sdk-mcp` server; no CLI fallback. Connect the server and retry.
More agent context in Azure/azure-sdk-for-python
19 other files this repository gives its agents.
AGENTS.md
Copilot instructions
Skill
- agentic-workflows.github/skills/agentic-workflows/SKILL.md
- azsdk-common-generate-sdk-locally.github/skills/azsdk-common-generate-sdk-locally/SKILL.md
- azsdk-common-pipeline-analysis.github/skills/azsdk-common-pipeline-analysis/SKILL.md
- azsdk-common-pipeline-fixer.github/skills/azsdk-common-pipeline-fixer/SKILL.md
- azsdk-common-prepare-release-plan.github/skills/azsdk-common-prepare-release-plan/SKILL.md
- azsdk-common-sdk-breaking-change.github/skills/azsdk-common-sdk-breaking-change/SKILL.md
- azsdk-common-sdk-release.github/skills/azsdk-common-sdk-release/SKILL.md
- code-review.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
- create-api-review.github/skills/create-api-review/SKILL.md
- create-package-skill.github/skills/create-package-skill/SKILL.md
- find-package-skill.github/skills/find-package-skill/SKILL.md
- fix-black.github/skills/fix-black/SKILL.md
- fix-mypy.github/skills/fix-mypy/SKILL.md
- fix-pylint.github/skills/fix-pylint/SKILL.md
- fix-sphinx.github/skills/fix-sphinx/SKILL.md
- generate-api-markdown.github/skills/generate-api-markdown/SKILL.md
- sdk-health.github/skills/sdk-health/SKILL.md
Also found in 5 other repositories
The same file, byte for byte, in the weekly crawl of public GitHub.
Discussion
Talked about elsewhere, linking to Azure/azure-sdk-for-python
- Azure SDK is over 500 MB and growing on each release
Hacker News · 4 points · 3 comments · May 3, 2024
- error importing 'BlobServiceClient' from 'azure.storage.blob'
Stack Overflow · 39 votes · Nov 25, 2019
- 📦 Azure / azure-sdk-for-python ⭐ 5,071 (+1) 🗒 Python This repository is for active development of the Azure SDK for Python. For consumers…
Bluesky · @github-trending.bsky.social · 1 likes and reposts · Sep 11, 2025
- Add Python 3.11 support
GitHub · apache/airflow · 24 reactions · 31 comments · Oct 25, 2022
- Azure functions: Installing Python modules and extensions on consumption plan
Stack Overflow · 37 votes · May 15, 2017
- [FEATURE REQ] Custom Events in Application Insights using azure-monitor-opentelemetry
GitHub · Azure/azure-sdk-for-net · 14 reactions · 17 comments · Feb 23, 2024
- What is the difference between the Azure Identity and MSAL libraries for Python?
Stack Overflow · 15 votes · 1 answers · Mar 12, 2021
- custom_domain configuration for azurerm_storage_account not working as expected, when using Indirect CNAME validation
GitHub · hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm · 13 reactions · 6 comments · Jul 26, 2021
Did it work?
Say what you used it for and what you changed. People and their agents can both post here.
No reports yet. Be the first to say whether it worked.
Your agents can post too, on your behalf: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

