seo-local
Skill4 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Local SEO optimization covering Google Business Profile (GBP) audit, local ranking factors, NAP consistency, citation management, review strategy, local content optimization, and multi-location management. Use when user says "local SEO", "Google Business Profile", "GBP", "local ranking", "NAP consistency", "local citations", "review management", or mentions a physical business location.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 27 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 49
Never add keywords to business name (violates Google guidelines, risks suspension)
- Distinctive: line 52
Keep hours accurate — incorrect hours damage trust signals
- Distinctive: line 53
Use UTM parameters on GBP website link for tracking
- Distinctive: line 140
Keep unique — don't copy-paste same response
- Distinctive: line 148
Never argue publicly — potential customers are watching
- Distinctive: line 192
Never create thin location pages with only city name swapped
- Distinctive: line 244
Location-specific social profiles: if resources allow
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 27 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
seo-local — Local SEO Optimization
Local SEO Framework
Dimension A: Google Business Profile (GBP) Optimization
Profile Completeness Checklist
| Element | Status | Impact | Notes |
| Business name | — | Critical | Exact legal name, no keyword stuffing |
| Primary category | — | Critical | Most specific category available |
| Secondary categories | — | High | Up to 9 additional, all relevant |
| Business description | — | High | 750 chars max, natural keywords, value proposition |
| Address | — | Critical | Exact match across all platforms |
| Phone number | — | Critical | Local number preferred over toll-free |
| Website URL | — | Critical | Link to location-specific page if multi-location |
| Business hours | — | High | Include special hours, holiday hours |
| Photos | — | High | Minimum 10: exterior, interior, team, products |
| Products/Services | — | Medium | Complete catalog with descriptions and prices |
| Attributes | — | Medium | All applicable attributes selected |
| Q&A | — | Medium | Seed with common questions, monitor for new ones |
GBP Post Strategy
| Post Type | Frequency | Best Practices |
| What's New | 1-2x/week | News, updates, behind-the-scenes |
| Offers | As available | Clear terms, expiration date, CTA |
| Events | As scheduled | Date, time, description, registration link |
| Products | When new/updated | Photo, price, description, link |
GBP Optimization Rules
- Never add keywords to business name (violates Google guidelines, risks suspension)
- Respond to ALL reviews within 24-48 hours
- Upload new photos monthly (minimum)
- Keep hours accurate — incorrect hours damage trust signals
- Use UTM parameters on GBP website link for tracking
Dimension B: Local Ranking Factors (2026)
The Local Pack Ranking Triad
| Factor | Weight | Controllable? | Optimization |
| Relevance | ~25% | Yes | Category selection, description, content |
| Distance | ~25% | No | Physical location is fixed |
| Prominence | ~50% | Yes | Reviews, citations, links, content, authority |
Local Organic vs Local Pack
| Aspect | Local Pack (Map) | Local Organic |
| Ranking factors | GBP signals dominant | Standard SEO + local signals |
| Content needed | GBP profile optimization | Location pages, local content |
| Links needed | Citations + local links | Standard link building + local |
| Reviews | Directly visible, critical | Indirect signal |
Key Local Ranking Signals
- GBP signals: Category, keywords in description, completeness, activity
- Review signals: Quantity, velocity, diversity, keywords in reviews, responses
- On-page signals: NAP on website, local keywords, city/state in title tags
- Citation signals: NAP consistency, citation volume, quality of citation sources
- Link signals: Local links (chambers, newspapers, directories), DR of linking domains
- Behavioral signals: Click-through rate, mobile clicks-to-call, driving directions requests
- Personalization: Searcher's location, search history
Dimension C: NAP Consistency & Citations
NAP Audit Process
- Define canonical NAP (exact format to use everywhere):
Name: [Exact Business Name LLC] Address: [123 Main St, Suite 100, City, ST 12345] Phone: [(555) 123-4567] - Audit all existing citations for consistency
- Prioritize fixes by citation source authority
Core Citation Sources (Must-Have)
| Platform | Priority | Category |
| Google Business Profile | Critical | Search engine |
| Apple Maps / Apple Business Connect | Critical | Maps |
| Bing Places | High | Search engine |
| Yelp | High | Review/Directory |
| High | Social | |
| Better Business Bureau | High | Trust |
| Yellow Pages / YP.com | Medium | Directory |
| Foursquare | Medium | Data aggregator |
Industry-Specific Citations
| Industry | Key Citations |
| Healthcare | Healthgrades, Vitals, WebMD, Zocdoc |
| Legal | Avvo, FindLaw, Justia, Lawyers.com |
| Real Estate | Zillow, Realtor.com, Trulia, Redfin |
| Restaurants | Yelp, TripAdvisor, OpenTable, Zomato |
| Home Services | Angi, HomeAdvisor, Thumbtack, Houzz |
| Automotive | Cars.com, AutoTrader, CarGurus, DealerRater |
Citation Consistency Scoring
| Issue | Severity | Impact |
| Wrong business name | Critical | Confuses Google entity matching |
| Wrong address | Critical | Misdirects customers, loses ranking |
| Wrong phone number | High | Lost leads, trust issues |
| Inconsistent formatting | Medium | Minor confusion signal |
| Duplicate listings | Medium | Dilutes authority |
| Closed/outdated listing | High | Incorrect info in results |
Dimension D: Review Management & Reputation
Review Acquisition Strategy
| Channel | Timing | Method |
| Post-service email | 1-3 days after service | Automated email with direct review link |
| SMS follow-up | Same day or next day | Short text with review link |
| In-store QR code | At point of sale | QR code on receipt, counter card |
| Website widget | After conversion/visit | Review prompt on thank-you page |
| Staff ask | End of positive interaction | Verbal request + card with link |
Review Response Templates
Positive review (4-5 stars):
- Thank by name, reference specific service, invite back
- Keep unique — don't copy-paste same response
Neutral review (3 stars):
- Thank for feedback, acknowledge concern, offer resolution
- Move detailed conversation offline
Negative review (1-2 stars):
- Apologize, don't be defensive, offer offline resolution
- Never argue publicly — potential customers are watching
Review Metrics to Track
| Metric | Good | Warning | Critical |
| Average rating | ≥4.5 | 4.0-4.4 | <4.0 |
| Review count vs competitors | Above avg | At avg | Below avg |
| Review velocity | Steady growth | Flat | Declining |
| Response rate | 100% | >80% | <80% |
| Response time | <24h | 24-72h | >72h |
Review Schema Implementation
{
"@type": "LocalBusiness",
"aggregateRating": {
"@type": "AggregateRating",
"ratingValue": "4.8",
"reviewCount": "127",
"bestRating": "5",
"worstRating": "1"
}
}Note: Only use AggregateRating from legitimate, verifiable review sources.
Dimension E: Local Content Strategy
Service Area Pages
For businesses serving multiple locations:
| Element | Requirement | Example |
| Unique title | City + Service + Brand | "Plumbing Services in Austin, TX - ABC Plumbing" |
| Unique H1 | Natural, location-specific | "Expert Plumbing Services for Austin Homes" |
| Unique content | 60%+ unique per page | Local landmarks, area-specific info, team bios |
| Local schema | LocalBusiness + areaServed | PostalAddress + GeoCoordinates |
| Google Maps embed | Centered on service area | Dynamic map with business marker |
| Local testimonials | From customers in that area | Name + area (with permission) |
| Local images | Photos from that location | Team, projects, local landmarks |
Quality Gates for Location Pages
- Warning: 30+ location pages → enforce 60%+ unique content per page
- Hard stop: 50+ location pages → require user justification (doorway page risk)
- Never create thin location pages with only city name swapped
- Each page must provide genuine value to someone in that location
Cross-reference: references/quality-gates.md for content thresholds.
Local Content Types
| Content | SEO Value | Effort |
| Service area pages | High (local rankings) | Medium |
| Local event coverage | Medium (freshness + links) | Low |
| Local guides/resources | High (links + authority) | High |
| Case studies (local clients) | High (E-E-A-T + trust) | Medium |
| Community involvement posts | Medium (brand + links) | Low |
| Local FAQ page | Medium (PAA + voice search) | Low |
Local Schema Markup
Required for local businesses:
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "LocalBusiness",
"name": "Business Name",
"address": {
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "123 Main St",
"addressLocality": "Austin",
"addressRegion": "TX",
"postalCode": "78701"
},
"geo": {
"@type": "GeoCoordinates",
"latitude": "30.2672",
"longitude": "-97.7431"
},
"telephone": "+1-555-123-4567",
"openingHoursSpecification": [],
"areaServed": {
"@type": "GeoCircle",
"geoMidpoint": {"@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "30.2672", "longitude": "-97.7431"},
"geoRadius": "50 mi"
}
}Multi-Location Management
For businesses with multiple physical locations:
- Unique GBP per location (never share listings)
- Location-specific landing pages with unique content
- Store locator page with structured data (if 5+ locations)
- Consistent branding but locally relevant content
- Individual review management per location
- Location-specific social profiles if resources allow
Scoring
| Category | Weight |
| GBP Optimization | 30% |
| NAP Consistency | 20% |
| Review Management | 20% |
| Local Ranking Factors | 15% |
| Local Content Strategy | 15% |
Output Format
Generate LOCAL-SEO-REPORT.md with:
- Local SEO Score (0-100)
- GBP Audit (completeness checklist, optimization opportunities)
- NAP Consistency Report (citations audited, issues found, fix priorities)
- Review Analysis (rating, count, velocity, response rate, competitor comparison)
- Local Ranking Assessment (Local Pack visibility, local organic rankings)
- Content Recommendations (service area pages, local content plan)
- Priority Action Plan (Critical → High → Medium → Low)
Other versions30 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 30
- AgriciDaniel/claude-seo★ 20ksame name
- AgriciDaniel/codex-seo★ 795same name
- zhtyyx/codex-seo★ 108same name
- Hainrixz/claude-seo-ai★ 81same name
- mangollc/claude-seo-skill★ 37same name
- ronaldships/foundvia-discovery★ 29same name
- Thibaultbm/claude-seo-geo★ 17same name
- brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-marketing★ 9same name
- joaoguirunas/team-os★ 6same name
- avalonreset/legends-seo-dungeon★ 4same name
20 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use seo-maps, seo-sxo and 6 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
webdevarifSkillseo-maps
Maps intelligence for local SEO: geo-grid rank tracking, GBP profile auditing via API, review intelligence across Google/Tripadvisor/Trustpilot, cross-platform NAP verification, competitor radius mapping, and LocalBusiness schema generation. Three tiers: free (Overpass + Geoapify), DataForSEO, and DataForSEO + Google. Use when user says "maps", "geo-grid", "rank tracking", "GBP audit", "review velocity", "competitor radius", or "SoLV".
Also in 14 projects that use this
webdevarifSkillseo-sxo
Search Experience Optimization: reads Google SERPs backwards to detect page-type mismatches, derives user stories from search intent signals, and scores pages from multiple persona perspectives. Identifies why well-optimized pages fail to rank by analyzing what Google rewards for each keyword. Use when user says "SXO", "search experience", "page type mismatch", "SERP analysis", "user story", "persona scoring", "why isn't my page ranking", "intent mismatch", or "wireframe".
Also in 15 projects that use this
AgriciDanielSkillseo-agentic
Audit and fix agent readiness: the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing fraction, accessibility tree for agents, robots.txt and Content-Signal for AI agents, WAF treatment of agent traffic, llms.txt, Markdown delivery, ai-catalog.json, /.well-known discovery files, and WebMCP tools. Use when the user asks whether AI agents can use or browse the site, or about llms.txt or WebMCP. Exclude AI citability and brand signals (seo-geo) and commerce protocol depth (seo-ecommerce).
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +5 more from webdevarif
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- seo-agentSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- seo-backlinksSkill
- seo-competitor-analysisSkill
- seo-competitor-pagesSkill
- seo-content-briefSkill
- seo-contentSkill
- seo-data-toolsSkill
- seo-geoSkill
- seo-hreflangSkill
- seo-imagesSkill
- seo-keyword-researchSkill
- seo-monitorSkill
- seo-multiplatformSkill
- seo-pageSkill
- seo-performanceSkill
- seo-planSkill
- seo-programmaticSkill
- seo-rank-trackerSkill
- seo-reportSkill
- seo-schemaSkill
- seo-sitemapSkill
- seoSkill
- seo-technicalSkill
- seo-visualSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

