seo-geo
Skill4 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Optimize content for AI Overviews (formerly SGE), ChatGPT web search, Perplexity, and other AI-powered search experiences. Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) analysis including brand mention signals, AI crawler accessibility, llms.txt compliance, passage-level citability scoring, and platform-specific optimization. Use when user says "AI Overviews", "SGE", "GEO", "AI search", "LLM optimization", "Perplexity", "AI citations", "ChatGPT search", or "AI visibility".
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 46 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 84
No specific data points
- Distinctive: line 101
No lists or tables
- Distinctive: line 130
No brand presence across platforms
- Very specific: line 146
Check robots.txt for these AI crawlers:
- Distinctive: line 275
Add "What is [topic]?" definition in first 60 words
- Distinctive: line 276
Create 134-167 word self-contained answer blocks
- Distinctive: line 277
Add question-based H2/H3 headings
- Distinctive: line 279
Add publication/update dates
- Distinctive: line 286
Add author bio with credentials + Wikipedia/LinkedIn links
- Distinctive: line 287
Ensure server-side rendering for key content
- Distinctive: line 289
Add comparison tables with data
- Distinctive: line 294
Create original research/surveys (unique citability)
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 46 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AI Search / GEO Optimization (February 2026)
Key Statistics
| Metric | Value | Source |
| AI Overviews reach | 1.5 billion users/month across 200+ countries | |
| AI Overviews query coverage | 48% of all queries (58% YoY growth) | BrightEdge/Semrush 2025 |
| AI-referred sessions growth | 527% (Jan-May 2025) | SparkToro |
| ChatGPT weekly active users | 900 million | OpenAI |
| Perplexity monthly queries | 500+ million | Perplexity |
| Perplexity Sonar response speed | 10x faster than Gemini 2.0 Flash | Perplexity |
| Google AI Mode | Zero blue links, 180+ countries | Google, May 2025 |
Critical Insight: Brand Mentions > Backlinks
Brand mentions correlate 3× more strongly with AI visibility than backlinks. (Ahrefs December 2025 study of 75,000 brands)
| Signal | Correlation with AI Citations |
| YouTube mentions | ~0.737 (strongest) |
| Reddit mentions | High |
| Wikipedia presence | High |
| LinkedIn presence | Moderate |
| Domain Rating (backlinks) | ~0.266 (weak) |
Only 11% of domains are cited by both ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews for the same query — platform-specific optimization is essential.
Answer-First Content & Earned Mentions
Answer-First Content
AI search engines extract answers from the first 200 words of content. Structure every page with:
- Direct answer to the primary query in the opening paragraph
- Key statistics and facts front-loaded
- Self-contained answer blocks (134-167 words) that can be cited independently
Earned Mentions > Owned Content
For AI citation, earned mentions (third-party references to your brand/product) carry significantly more weight than owned content:
| Signal Type | AI Citation Weight | Example |
| Earned mentions | Highest | Reddit discussions, YouTube reviews, Wikipedia entries mentioning your brand |
| Expert citations | High | Industry analysts, academic papers citing your research |
| Owned authoritative | Medium | Your blog with E-E-A-T signals, documentation |
| Owned generic | Low | Marketing pages, press releases |
Strategy: Invest in being mentioned and cited by others, not just publishing your own content.
GEO Analysis Criteria (Updated)
1. Citability Score (25%)
Optimal passage length: 134-167 words for AI citation.
Strong signals:
- Clear, quotable sentences with specific facts/statistics
- Self-contained answer blocks (can be extracted without context)
- Direct answer in first 40-60 words of section
- Claims attributed with specific sources
- Definitions following "X is..." or "X refers to..." patterns
- Unique data points not found elsewhere
Weak signals:
- Vague, general statements
- Opinion without evidence
- Buried conclusions
- No specific data points
2. Structural Readability (20%)
92% of AI Overview citations come from top-10 ranking pages, but 47% come from pages ranking below position 5 — demonstrating different selection logic.
Strong signals:
- Clean H1→H2→H3 heading hierarchy
- Question-based headings (matches query patterns)
- Short paragraphs (2-4 sentences)
- Tables for comparative data
- Ordered/unordered lists for step-by-step or multi-item content
- FAQ sections with clear Q&A format
Weak signals:
- Wall of text with no structure
- Inconsistent heading hierarchy
- No lists or tables
- Information buried in paragraphs
3. Multi-Modal Content (15%)
Content with multi-modal elements sees 156% higher selection rates.
Check for:
- Text + relevant images
- Video content (embedded or linked)
- Infographics and charts
- Interactive elements (calculators, tools)
- Structured data supporting media
4. Authority & Brand Signals (20%)
Strong signals:
- Author byline with credentials
- Publication date and last-updated date
- Citations to primary sources (studies, official docs, data)
- Organization credentials and affiliations
- Expert quotes with attribution
- Entity presence in Wikipedia, Wikidata
- Mentions on Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn
Weak signals:
- Anonymous authorship
- No dates
- No sources cited
- No brand presence across platforms
5. Technical Accessibility (20%)
AI crawlers do NOT execute JavaScript — server-side rendering is critical.
Check for:
- Server-side rendering (SSR) vs client-only content
- AI crawler access in robots.txt
- llms.txt file presence and configuration
- RSL 1.0 licensing terms
AI Crawler Detection
Check robots.txt for these AI crawlers:
| Crawler | Owner | Purpose |
| GPTBot | OpenAI | ChatGPT web search |
| OAI-SearchBot | OpenAI | OpenAI search features |
| ChatGPT-User | OpenAI | ChatGPT browsing |
| ClaudeBot | Anthropic | Claude web features |
| PerplexityBot | Perplexity | Perplexity AI search |
| CCBot | Common Crawl | Training data (often blocked) |
| anthropic-ai | Anthropic | Claude training |
| Bytespider | ByteDance | TikTok/Douyin AI |
| cohere-ai | Cohere | Cohere models |
Recommendation: Allow GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot for AI search visibility. Block CCBot and training crawlers if desired.
llms.txt Standard
The emerging llms.txt standard provides AI crawlers with structured content guidance.
Location: /llms.txt (root of domain)
Format:
# Title of site
> Brief description
## Main sections
- [Page title](url): Description
- [Another page](url): Description
## Optional: Key facts
- Fact 1
- Fact 2Check for:
- Presence of
/llms.txt - Structured content guidance
- Key page highlights
- Contact/authority information
RSL 1.0 (Really Simple Licensing)
New standard (December 2025) for machine-readable AI licensing terms.
Backed by: Reddit, Yahoo, Medium, Quora, Cloudflare, Akamai, Creative Commons
Check for: RSL implementation and appropriate licensing terms.
Platform-Specific Optimization
| Platform | Key Citation Sources | Optimization Focus |
| Google AI Overviews | Top-10 ranking pages (92%) | Traditional SEO + passage optimization |
| ChatGPT | Wikipedia (47.9%), Reddit (11.3%) | Entity presence, authoritative sources |
| Perplexity | Reddit (46.7%), Wikipedia | Community validation, discussions |
| Bing Copilot | Bing index, authoritative sites | Bing SEO, IndexNow |
Output
Generate GEO-ANALYSIS.md with:
- GEO Readiness Score: XX/100
- Platform breakdown (Google AIO, ChatGPT, Perplexity scores)
- AI Crawler Access Status (which crawlers allowed/blocked)
- llms.txt Status (present, missing, recommendations)
- Brand Mention Analysis (presence on Wikipedia, Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn)
- Passage-Level Citability (optimal 134-167 word blocks identified)
- Server-Side Rendering Check (JavaScript dependency analysis)
- Top 5 Highest-Impact Changes
- Schema Recommendations (for AI discoverability)
- Content Reformatting Suggestions (specific passages to rewrite)
GEO Academic Research Foundation
Aggarwal et al. (KDD 2024) — "GEO: Generative Engine Optimization"
Princeton University research establishing GEO as a discipline. Key findings:
9 GEO Optimization Strategies & Effectiveness
| Strategy | Visibility Improvement | Best For |
| Cite Sources | +30-40% | All content types |
| Add Statistics | +25-35% | Data-driven topics |
| Include Quotations | +15-25% | Expert/opinion content |
| Make Content Authoritative | +20-30% | YMYL, technical topics |
| Use Technical Terms | +10-20% | Specialized/professional audiences |
| Optimize Fluency | +5-15% | All content (baseline quality) |
| Add Unique Words | +5-10% | Competitive topics |
| Simplify Language | +5-10% | Consumer/general topics |
| Keyword Stuffing | -15-25% (negative) | Never use — penalized |
Key takeaway: Citation and statistical enrichment are 3-5x more effective than keyword-focused strategies for AI visibility.
GEO Scoring Formula
GEO Score = (Citability × 0.25) + (Structure × 0.20) + (Multi-Modal × 0.15) + (Authority × 0.20) + (Technical × 0.20)
Where each dimension is scored 0-100:
- Citability: Self-contained answer blocks, stats with sources, definition patterns
- Structure: Heading hierarchy, lists/tables, paragraph length, FAQ format
- Multi-Modal: Images, video, infographics, interactive elements
- Authority: Author credentials, citations, brand mentions, entity presence
- Technical: SSR, AI crawler access, llms.txt, structured dataGEO vs Traditional SEO
| Aspect | Traditional SEO | GEO |
| Target | Blue links (position 1-10) | AI-generated answers (citations) |
| Key factor | Backlinks + on-page | Brand mentions + citability |
| Content format | Long-form, keyword-rich | Structured, quotable passages |
| Success metric | Ranking position, CTR | Citation frequency, brand visibility |
| Update cycle | Algorithm updates | Model updates, feature rollouts |
Quick Wins
- Add "What is [topic]?" definition in first 60 words
- Create 134-167 word self-contained answer blocks
- Add question-based H2/H3 headings
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add publication/update dates
- Implement Person schema for authors
- Allow key AI crawlers in robots.txt
Medium Effort
- Create
/llms.txtfile - Add author bio with credentials + Wikipedia/LinkedIn links
- Ensure server-side rendering for key content
- Build entity presence on Reddit, YouTube
- Add comparison tables with data
- Implement FAQ sections (structured, not schema for commercial sites)
High Impact
- Create original research/surveys (unique citability)
- Build Wikipedia presence for brand/key people
- Establish YouTube channel with content mentions
- Implement comprehensive entity linking (sameAs across platforms)
- Develop unique tools or calculators
Other versions51 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 25
- AgriciDaniel/claude-seo★ 20k17% same
- AgriciDaniel/codex-seo★ 79568% same
- zhtyyx/codex-seo★ 10818% same
- coopersimson96/ai-content-system★ 1798% same
- avalonreset/legends-seo-dungeon★ 439% same
- megastep/codex-skills★ 498% same
- realwigu/claude-skills★ 498% same
- agrivisionai/claude-skills★ 158% same
- get-proofpilot/claude-skills-catalog★ 198% same
- hungphamwp/claude-skills★ 193% same
15 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 26
- ReScienceLab/opc-skills★ 1.9ksame name
- theexperiencecompany/gaia★ 324same name
- eunomia-bpf/eunomia.dev★ 239same name
- PostPlusAI/postplus-skills★ 27same name
- chuhaiqu/skills★ 22same name
- whyashthakker/agent-skills-marketing★ 15same name
- ZachArticulateV/designer-pro-and-seo★ 10same name
- Littlpinguin/marketing-cockpit-template★ 9same name
- joaoguirunas/team-os★ 6same name
- oegeyilmaz9/seo-aeo-geo-ultimate★ 3same name
16 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use seo-google, seo-image-gen and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
webdevarifSkillseo-google
Google SEO APIs: Search Console (Search Analytics, URL Inspection, Sitemaps), PageSpeed Insights v5, CrUX field data with 25-week history, Indexing API v3, and GA4 organic traffic. Provides real Google field data for Core Web Vitals, indexation status, search performance, and organic traffic trends. Use when user says "search console", "GSC", "PageSpeed", "CrUX", "field data", "indexing API", "GA4 organic", "URL inspection", or "real CWV data".
Also in 11 projects that use this
webdevarifSkillseo-image-gen
AI image generation for SEO assets: OG/social preview images, blog hero images, schema images, product photography, infographics. Powered by Gemini via nanobanana-mcp. Requires banana extension installed. Use when user says \"generate image\", \"OG image\", \"social preview\", \"hero image\", \"blog image\", \"product photo\", \"infographic\", \"seo image\", \"create visual\", \"image-gen\", \"favicon\", \"schema image\", \"pinterest pin\", \"generate visual\", \"banner\", or \"thumbnail\".
Also in 11 projects that use this
- +4 more from webdevarif
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- seo-agentSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- seo-backlinksSkill
- seo-competitor-analysisSkill
- seo-competitor-pagesSkill
- seo-content-briefSkill
- seo-contentSkill
- seo-data-toolsSkill
- seo-hreflangSkill
- seo-imagesSkill
- seo-keyword-researchSkill
- seo-localSkill
- seo-monitorSkill
- seo-multiplatformSkill
- seo-pageSkill
- seo-performanceSkill
- seo-planSkill
- seo-programmaticSkill
- seo-rank-trackerSkill
- seo-reportSkill
- seo-schemaSkill
- seo-sitemapSkill
- seoSkill
- seo-technicalSkill
- seo-visualSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

