Reviews the uncommitted changes in an adk-python working tree and reports correctness, design, public-API stability, test, sample and documentation gaps as a prioritized findings report, fixing them only when asked. Use when the user asks to review local changes, wants a self-review before opening a pull request, asks whether a change breaks the public API or needs tests, samples or docs, or asks what is wrong with the current diff. Required for changes to public APIs, core architecture (Runner, Workflow, BaseNode), new features and major refactors. Don't use for a single style nit (use adk-style), for diagnosing a failing test or a misbehaving agent at runtime (use adk-debug), or for wording a commit message or PR description (use adk-git).
22k3mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a pull request against CDP architecture standards — fetches PR diff, verifies previous comments are addressed, validates PR metadata (title, branch, issue reference, size), runs a code-standards enforcer against every file in `.claude/rules/` and `.claude/hooks/guard-protected-files.sh`, and drafts inline review comments with suggested fixes. NEVER auto-posts comments or submits reviews — always presents a draft in the terminal for user approval before any comment lands on the PR. Use when reviewing PRs, checking PR quality, validating code changes, or when the user says "review", "check this PR", or "audit code".
3.4k53d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a numbered GitHub pull request for correctness, API safety, Go idioms, and protocol coverage, then post inline comments plus one updating summary. Use only when the user asks to review an open PR by number. For a local or pre-PR diff, do not use this skill — apply review-core.md in this directory instead.
3.4k2mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review an OpenROAD pull request following the project's review priority order: correctness > QoR impact > testing > architecture > style > process. Fetches PR diff, analyzes changes, and prints draft review notes for the human reviewer to inspect and post manually. Use when asked to review a PR, check a pull request, look at changes, or provide code review for any OpenROAD module. Also triggers on: "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", "code review", "review changes", "review #NUMBER".
3.3k8d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Apply assistant-ui's existing review standards to a local change or pull request before submission and after substantive revisions. Use to compare the requested behavior with the diff, trace affected runtime paths, and assess evidence without duplicating repository policy.
Steady7 mentions in 2 weeks
8 projects use a version of this
13k48d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a pull request against the SGLang Cookbook (docs/, Mintlify) contribution checklist — the config-driven format (per-model config + benchmarks JSX consumed by the shared _deployment.jsx / _playground.jsx engines). Run with /cookbook-review-pr <PR number>.
First review of the PR linked to the current branch (or a PR number). Checks what the PR claims against what it does, bugs, tests, project conventions and reuse, security, consumers, performance and deploy safety, verifies every finding, and prints a plain-language verdict with numbered findings. Read-only until the user picks, after the report, either to fix findings here or to post a request-changes review for the author (never both), or a "prove N" throwaway test; never posts unasked. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review PR 3191", or invokes /pr-review.
3.1k17d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Orchestrates the EGM Goldfish Review Protocol. Used as part of the EGM process to perform design document reviews. Executes five review phases: Initial Zoom Out Review, Comprehension Review, Design Critique, Intermediate Zoom Out Review, and Implementation Readiness.
Steady76 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
20k4d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Reviews a testcontainers-node pull request (own or a contributor's) against the maintainer's recurring review feedback and drafts terse inline comments for approval. Use when asked to review, check, look over or give feedback on a PR, PR number, branch or diff, for a self-review before opening a PR, and when the @claude GitHub Action is asked to review.
Steady13 mentions in 2 weeks
185 projects use a version of this
2.6k33d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a GitHub pull request in the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo against the team's reviewer checklist: PR title/description conventions, linked issue, logic errors and unhandled edge cases, breaking changes, test coverage, docs updates, security (input handling), and new dependencies. Use whenever a maintainer asks you to review, look over, "take a look at", or check whether something is ready to merge in mcp-toolbox, e.g. "review #3703", "can you look at this PR", "is this good to merge", or when they paste an mcp-toolbox PR link. PROPOSE-ONLY: delivers the review in chat for the maintainer to post; never approves, requests changes, comments, labels, or merges on its own.
Steady8 mentions in 2 weeks
10 projects use a version of this
17k7mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a Rust pull request against the nearcore engineering rubric — correctness, production safety, performance, Rust-specific concerns, security, and comment quality. Use when asked to review a PR, do a code review of a branch's changes, or check a diff before merge. This is the same rubric CI runs on @claude review.
2.6k20d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review Clojure and ClojureScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing Clojure/ClojureScript code.
Steady2 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
50k6d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review Dune commits, PRs, or working tree changes using the repository review checklist. Use when the user asks for review-check, review checklist, or a code review that should follow doc/dev/prompts/review-check.md.
1.9k5mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a MOOSE pull request or local branch against MOOSE's contribution standards: applicable AGENTS.md guidance, the MOOSE Code Standard (SCS), the SQA testing rules (every test is a requirement, with requirement/design/issues), required documentation stub pages for new objects, and PR governance (issue references, scope, required-vs-suggested phrasing). Use this whenever someone wants to review MOOSE changes or asks "review this PR", "review my branch", "is this ready to merge", "check my changes before I submit", or wants pre-submission feedback on code in the MOOSE framework or its modules - even if they never say the word "review". This is the MOOSE-aware review layer; it complements the generic /code-review and /security-review skills and defers to them for deep correctness and security analysis rather than duplicating that work.
195 projects use a version of this
2.4k16d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Plain text files in a repository that tell a coding agent how the project works: commands to run, conventions to follow and things to avoid. CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, cursor rules and skills are the common kinds.
CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md?
CLAUDE.md is read by Claude Code. AGENTS.md is an open format that Codex, Cursor and other agents read. Many projects keep one and point the other at it.
What is a skill?
A folder with a SKILL.md that describes one capability, such as filling PDFs or reviewing code. The agent loads it only when the task calls for it.
Can I search my own team's files too?
Your agents already can, over MCP, limited to the files you're allowed to read. Searching them from this page is coming.
GoogleSkill
