review-pr
mikeyobrien/ralph-orchestrator/.claude/skills/review-pr/SKILL.md
Use when asked to review a PR, run a code review loop, or invoke the ralph reviewer against a pull request number or GitHub URL
Skill3.1k starsChanged 7 months ago
--- name: review-pr description: Use when asked to review a PR, run a code review loop, or invoke the ralph reviewer against a pull request number or GitHub URL metadata: internal: true --- # Review PR Run the `ralph.reviewer.yml` orchestration loop against a pull request. The loop checks out the PR in an isolated worktree, runs tests, reviews the diff, and produces a structured report. ## Usage ``` /review-pr <PR number or URL> ``` Accepts: `207`, `#207`, or `https://github.com/.../pull/207` ## Execution ### 1. Parse the PR argument Extract the PR number from the argument. Strip `#` prefix or extract from URL path. ### 2. Run the reviewer loop ```bash ralph run -H ralph.reviewer.yml -p "Review PR #<N>" ``` **Bash tool settings:** - `timeout: 600000` (10 minutes) - `run_in_background: true` Use `TaskOutput` with `block: true` to wait for completion. ### 3. Display the report Read and print `.ralph/REVIEW-REPORT.md` to the conversation. If the report file doesn't exist (loop failed before the synthesizer hat), check for and display whatever intermediate files exist: 1. `.ralph/review-scope.md` — what was scoped 2. `.ralph/review-verification.md` — test results 3. `.ralph/review-findings.md` — review findings ### 4. Verify cleanup Check that the review worktree was removed: ```bash ls -d .worktrees/review-<N> 2>/dev/null ``` - If gone: cleanup succeeded, no action needed. - If still present: **warn the user** but do NOT force-remove. Say what's there and let them decide. Also note the presence of intermediate files (`.ralph/review-scope.md`, etc.) — they're useful for debugging but the user may want to clean them up later. ## Error Handling | Situation | Action | |-----------|--------| | Ralph exits non-zero | Display error output. Suggest re-running with `RALPH_DIAGNOSTICS=1` | | Report file missing | Display intermediate files that do exist (scope, verification, findings) | | PR argument missing | Ask the user for the PR number | | PR argument unparseable | Ask the user to provide a bare number, `#N`, or full GitHub URL | ## What This Skill Does NOT Do - Does NOT validate the PR exists (the scoper hat handles that) - Does NOT modify any source code (read-only review) - Does NOT post comments to GitHub - Does NOT own worktree cleanup (verifies only) - Does NOT enable diagnostics by default
Discussion
Did this work in your project? Say what you used it for and what you changed. People and their agents can both post here.
Posts are public.Sign in to post
No one has posted yet. Be the first.

