Use only when the user explicitly requests a review or audit of frontend code under `web/` or `packages/dify-ui/`. Supports pending-change, file-focused, and pasted-diff reviews. Do not use for implementation-only requests, diagnosis without review intent, or backend-only code.
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline and the review looks quick to do from reading it.
Review code changes in pull requests or local diffs for S3Mock. Use when asked to review a PR, inspect changes, or provide structured feedback on correctness, conventions, test quality, and documentation. Outputs findings structured as Must fix / Should fix / Nit.
Write domain-authentic review articles that synthesize rather than stack. Covers 10 scientific domains (physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, mathematics, computer_science, earth_environment, astronomy, economics, materials) with per-domain style guides mined from landmark reviews in RMP / Nat. Rev. X / Annu. Rev. / Chem. Rev. / Bull. AMS / etc. Use this skill when writing a survey / review / report that spans multiple primary papers.
Adversarial senior review of the spec before any code is written. Constructs a skeptical reviewer whose authority comes from the codebase, §R research, and live best-practice — then tries to REFUTE the spec, not rubber-stamp it. Every finding cites evidence (file:line or source); unverifiable ones are flagged. Survivors harden §V; the run ends in an explicit go / no-go gate. Triggers before building anything high-blast-radius, when the user says "review the spec", "red-team this", "is this plan sound", "senior review", or invokes /ck:review.
Review and improve the code comments a PR or branch adds, against the standard in docs/developer/CODE_COMMENTS.md: cut the ones that restate the code, tighten the verbose ones, reframe what-comments into the why or the constraint, and add the contract docs the change left missing. Runs comment-lint for the mechanical rules first, then judges what a linter cannot: padding around one real fact, facts already stated by a type or a name, comments that will go stale on the next unrelated change, and new public surfaces left undocumented. Applies comment-only edits and reports every verdict in chat. Use when asked to review, clean up, trim, thin out or improve the comments on a PR or branch, to strip AI-looking narration before requesting review, or when comment-lint findings need judgment rather than a mechanical fix. Pass --report-only to change nothing.
3 projects use a version of this
97k24d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Maintainer-grade code review for COLMAP (C++, CUDA/HIP, pycolmap, CMake, and benchmarks): checks geometric and numerical correctness, modularity and readability, memory/binding safety, performance, and test quality, while shrinking bloat, reusing existing helpers, and localizing changes. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "can this diff be smaller", or "is this over-engineered". Don't use when asked to implement changes or run benchmarks directly.
Steady9 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
13k12d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Runs a Greptile CLI review for the current local branch, installing or authenticating the CLI when needed, then summarizes JSON findings for the user. Use when the user wants Greptile feedback before opening a PR, outside a hosted PR review flow, or directly from a local checkout.
Surging3 mentions in 2 weeks
7 projects use a version of this
10k13d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Use this skill when a repository already has an open pull request and you need to run the Coder Agents Review loop: request review with `/coder-agents-review` when needed, wait for feedback from the `coder-agents-review` GitHub app, fix issues, and repeat until the app approves (an `approved` comment or an `APPROVED` review).
17k2d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Use when requesting independent code review, after implementation slices, before merging high-risk work, or when verification exposes evidence, baseline, architecture, compatibility, or retirement uncertainty.
Reviews a reverse-skill case package for scope readiness, Evidence to Finding to Path traceability, work item coverage, timeline references, and optional artifact hash integrity before report handoff.
45k1d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review code changes or PRs for quality, correctness, and reviewability. Use when asked to "review", "check", "provide feedback", or "post a review". Dispatches specialized agents in parallel for thorough analysis.
33k8mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Perform comprehensive code reviews for TypeScript projects, analyzing type safety, best practices, performance, security, and code quality with actionable feedback
Steady2 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
9.1k8mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review agent-written changes before merge, after substantial edits, or when re-reviewing a repair. Use the adversarial protocol for high-risk changes or an explicitly requested deep review.
29k49d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Plain text files in a repository that tell a coding agent how the project works: commands to run, conventions to follow and things to avoid. CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, cursor rules and skills are the common kinds.
CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md?
CLAUDE.md is read by Claude Code. AGENTS.md is an open format that Codex, Cursor and other agents read. Many projects keep one and point the other at it.
What is a skill?
A folder with a SKILL.md that describes one capability, such as filling PDFs or reviewing code. The agent loads it only when the task calls for it.
Can I search my own team's files too?
Your agents already can, over MCP, limited to the files you're allowed to read. Searching them from this page is coming.