observability-and-instrumentation
Skill6 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Instruments code so production behavior is visible and diagnosable. Use when adding logging, metrics, tracing, or alerting. Use when shipping any feature that runs in production and you need evidence it works. Use when production issues are reported but you can't tell what happened from the available data.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 7 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
7
Common
Most of the 33 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 40
If you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument — you'll log everything and learn nothing.
- Common: line 121
Use OpenTelemetry — it's the vendor-neutral standard, and auto-instrumentation covers HTTP, gRPC, and common DB clients with near-zero code:
- Common: line 152
It must be actionable: If the response is "ignore it, it self-heals", delete the alert.
- Common: line 155
Use two severities only: page (user-facing, act now) and ticket (degradation, act this week).
- Common: line 163
Follow one request across services in the tracing UI → no broken spans
- Common: line 182
No correlation/request ID — each log line is an orphan
- Common: line 192
After instrumenting a feature, confirm:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 33 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Observability and Instrumentation
Overview
Code you can't observe is code you can't operate. Observability is the ability to answer "what is the system doing and why?" from the outside, using the telemetry the code emits. Instrumentation is not a post-launch add-on — it's written alongside the feature, the same way tests are. If a feature ships without telemetry, the first user-reported bug becomes archaeology instead of a query.
When to Use
- Building any feature that will run in production
- Adding a new service, endpoint, background job, or external integration
- A production incident took too long to diagnose ("we couldn't tell what happened")
- Setting up or reviewing alerting rules
- Reviewing a PR that adds I/O, retries, queues, or cross-service calls
NOT for:
- Diagnosing a failure happening right now — use the
debugging-and-error-recoveryskill (observability is what makes that skill fast next time) - Profiling and optimizing measured slowness — use the
performance-optimizationskill - Launch-day monitoring checklists and rollback triggers — see the
shipping-and-launchskill; this skill covers the instrumentation that feeds them
Process
1. Define "working" before instrumenting
Telemetry without a question is noise. Before adding any instrumentation, write down 2–4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about this feature:
FEATURE: checkout payment retry
QUESTIONS ON-CALL WILL ASK:
1. What fraction of payments succeed on first attempt vs after retry?
2. When a payment fails permanently, why? (provider error? timeout? validation?)
3. Is the payment provider slower than usual?
→ Every signal below must help answer one of these.If you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument — you'll log everything and learn nothing.
2. Pick the right signal for each question
| Signal | Answers | Cost profile | Example |
| Structured log | "What happened in this specific case?" | Per-event; grows with traffic | payment_failed with provider error code |
| Metric | "How often / how fast, in aggregate?" | Fixed per series; cheap to query | p99 latency of provider calls |
| Trace | "Where did time go across services?" | Per-request; usually sampled | One slow checkout, broken down by hop |
Rule of thumb: metrics tell you that something is wrong, traces tell you where, logs tell you why.
3. Structured logging
Log events, not prose. Every log line is a JSON object with a stable event name and machine-readable fields:
// BAD: string interpolation — unqueryable, inconsistent
logger.info(`Payment ${id} failed for user ${userId} after ${n} retries`);
// GOOD: stable event name + structured fields
logger.warn({
event: 'payment_failed',
paymentId: id,
provider: 'stripe',
errorCode: err.code,
attempt: n,
}, 'payment failed');Log levels — use them consistently:
| Level | Meaning | On-call action |
error | Invariant broken; someone may need to act | Investigate |
warn | Degraded but handled (retry succeeded, fallback used) | Watch for trends |
info | Significant business event (order placed, job finished) | None |
debug | Diagnostic detail | Off in production by default |
Correlation IDs are mandatory. Generate (or accept) a request ID at the system boundary and attach it to every log line, span, and outbound call. Without it, you cannot reconstruct a single request from interleaved logs:
// Express: child logger per request, ID propagated downstream
app.use((req, res, next) => {
req.id = req.headers['x-request-id'] ?? crypto.randomUUID();
req.log = logger.child({ requestId: req.id });
res.setHeader('x-request-id', req.id);
next();
});Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, or full PII. This is a hard rule from the security-and-hardening skill — telemetry pipelines are a classic data-leak path. Allowlist fields; don't log whole request bodies.
4. Metrics
For request-driven services, instrument RED on every endpoint and every external dependency: Rate (requests/sec), Errors (failure rate), Duration (latency histogram, not average). For resources (queues, pools, hosts), use USE: Utilization, Saturation, Errors.
As with tracing, the vendor-neutral path is the OpenTelemetry metrics API (same SDK and context as step 5). The example below uses Prometheus' prom-client — one common backend choice, not the only one; the RED/USE and cardinality rules are identical either way.
import { Histogram } from 'prom-client';
const httpDuration = new Histogram({
name: 'http_request_duration_seconds',
help: 'HTTP request duration',
labelNames: ['method', 'route', 'status_class'], // '2xx', not '200'
buckets: [0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5],
});Cardinality is the failure mode. Every unique label combination is a separate time series. Labels must come from small, fixed sets (route template, status class, provider name). Never use user IDs, raw URLs, error messages, or other unbounded values as labels — that belongs in logs and traces.
OK as label: route="/api/tasks/:id" status_class="5xx" provider="stripe"
NEVER a label: user_id, email, request_id, full URL, error message textTrack averages never, percentiles always: an average hides the 1% of users having a terrible time. Use histograms and read p50/p95/p99.
5. Distributed tracing
Use OpenTelemetry — it's the vendor-neutral standard, and auto-instrumentation covers HTTP, gRPC, and common DB clients with near-zero code:
// tracing.ts — must be imported before anything else
import { NodeSDK } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-node';
import { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } from '@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node';
const sdk = new NodeSDK({
serviceName: 'checkout-service',
instrumentations: [getNodeAutoInstrumentations()],
});
sdk.start();Add manual spans only around meaningful internal units of work (e.g., applyDiscounts, chargeProvider) and attach the attributes on-call will filter by. Propagate context across every async boundary — HTTP headers, queue message metadata — or the trace dies at the gap. Sample head-based at a low rate by default; keep 100% of errors if your backend supports tail sampling.
6. Alerting
Alert on symptoms users feel, not on causes:
SYMPTOM (page-worthy): CAUSE (dashboard, not a page):
error rate > 1% for 5 min CPU at 85%
p99 latency > 2s one pod restarted
queue age > 10 min disk at 70%Cause-based alerts fire when nothing is wrong and miss failures you didn't predict. Symptom-based alerts fire exactly when users are hurt, regardless of the cause.
Rules for every alert you create:
- It must be actionable. If the response is "ignore it, it self-heals", delete the alert.
- It links to a runbook — even three lines: what it means, first query to run, escalation path.
- It has a threshold and duration justified by the SLO or by historical data, not by a guess.
- Use two severities only: page (user-facing, act now) and ticket (degradation, act this week). A third tier becomes noise that trains people to ignore everything.
7. Verify the telemetry itself
Instrumentation is code; it can be wrong. Before calling the work done, trigger the paths and look at the actual output:
- Force an error in staging → find it in the logs by
requestId, confirm fields are structured (not[object Object]) - Send test traffic → confirm metric series appear with the expected labels and sane values
- Follow one request across services in the tracing UI → no broken spans
- Fire each new alert once (lower the threshold temporarily) → confirm it reaches the right channel and the runbook link works
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
| "I'll add logging after it works" | "After" becomes "after the first incident", which is the most expensive moment to discover you're blind. Instrument as you build. |
| "More logs = more observability" | Unstructured noise makes incidents slower, not faster. Three queryable events beat three hundred prose lines. |
| "console.log is fine for now" | Unstructured output can't be filtered, correlated, or alerted on. The structured logger costs five extra minutes once. |
| "We can just look at the dashboards when something breaks" | Dashboards built without defined questions show you everything except the answer. Start from on-call questions. |
| "Alert on everything important, we'll tune later" | A noisy pager trains people to ignore it. The tuning never happens; the missed real page does. |
| "User ID as a metric label makes debugging easier" | It also makes your metrics backend fall over. High-cardinality lookups belong in logs and traces. |
| "Tracing is overkill for our two services" | Two services already means cross-service latency questions logs can't answer. Auto-instrumentation makes the cost trivial. |
Red Flags
- A feature PR with retries, queues, or external calls and zero new telemetry
- Log lines built by string interpolation instead of structured fields
- No correlation/request ID — each log line is an orphan
- Metrics labeled with user IDs, raw URLs, or error message text (cardinality bomb)
- Latency tracked as an average with no percentiles
- Alerts that fire daily and get acknowledged without action
- Alerts on causes (CPU, memory) paging humans while user-facing error rate is unmonitored
- Secrets, tokens, or full request bodies appearing in logs
- "It works on my machine" as the only evidence a production feature is healthy
Verification
After instrumenting a feature, confirm:
- The on-call questions for this feature are written down, and each signal maps to one
- All log output is structured (JSON), with stable event names and a correlation ID on every line
- No secrets, tokens, or unredacted PII in any log line (spot-check actual output)
- RED metrics exist for every new endpoint and every external dependency, with bounded label sets
- Latency is a histogram; p95/p99 are queryable
- A single request can be followed end-to-end in the tracing UI without broken spans
- Every new alert is symptom-based, has a runbook link, and was test-fired once
- An induced failure in staging was located via telemetry alone, without reading the source
For the at-a-glance version of this list, including the pre-launch instrumentation gate, see references/observability-checklist.md.
Other versions43 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 7
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 2100% same
- FuSheng-MG/Pi-Agent-skills★ 1100% same
- lucaszb-orla/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- maeng777/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- udsy19/.claude★ 0100% same
- yasdelayu/agent-x-cc★ 0100% same
- Zwin-ux/kit★ 0100% same
Edited · 25
- addyosmani/agent-skills★ 110k77% same
- ollaya-dev/ollaya★ 1.4k77% same
- rizqinrr/viserys-agent★ 55677% same
- vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh★ 3622% same
- afonsoft/skills★ 1093% same
- Marvellbrazil/my-agentic-skills★ 477% same
- PenceZHR/stagepass★ 4100% same
- lcx9451/dsh-engineering-skill-pack★ 377% same
- oleg494/coding-kit★ 354% same
- Ghosteken/agent-harness★ 2100% same
15 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 11
- songjiun10-collab/Senior-thinking-skills★ 87same name
- jmxt3/gitscape.ai★ 33same name
- bnalwalid/walidforge-skills★ 2same name
- ChloeVPin/open-agent-skills★ 2same name
- GuillemRoca/agent-skills-android★ 2same name
- Aleksandr-Litvinenko/agent-skills-ru★ 1same name
- Chrike/coding-agent-skills★ 1same name
- juandelossantos/another-agent-skills★ 1same name
- manastalukdar/ai-devstudio★ 1same name
- subhash-arabhi/saas-playbook★ 0same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use constraint-driven-development, incremental-implementation and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MrCipherSmithSkillconstraint-driven-development
Use when a project needs a persistent, measurable quality bar — starting a project without documented standards, 'set up constraints', or when coverage/perf/a11y thresholds get re-debated per-PR. Produces CONSTRAINTS.md with enforceable numbers, ratchets, and a guard against silent weakening. NOT for throwaway prototypes or a one-off CI setup.
Also in 14 projects that use this
LLl0k0laDSkillincremental-implementation
Use when implementing any feature or change that touches more than one file. Use when you're about to write a large amount of code at once, or when a task feels too big to land in one step.
Also in 26 projects that use this
barisariburnuSkillperformance-optimization
Complete performance optimization guide for Next.js applications including frontend, backend, database, caching, and general optimization strategies. Use when improving performance, reducing bundle size, optimizing queries, or implementing caching.
Also in 26 projects that use this
silvainfmSkillmarketing-ideas
When the user needs marketing ideas, inspiration, or strategies for their SaaS or software product. Also use when the user asks for 'marketing ideas,' 'growth ideas,' 'how to market,' 'marketing strategies,' 'marketing tactics,' 'ways to promote,' or 'ideas to grow.' This skill provides 140 proven marketing approaches organized by category.
Also in 3 projects that use this
CloudflareSkillreceiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillrequesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Also in 4 projects that use this
In this repository281 other files it gives its agents.
- redis-development/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- video-podcast-maker/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- imagenCN/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adaptSkill
- Add Admin API EndpointSkill
- agent-browserSkill
- agent-developmentSkill
- Agent DevelopmentSkill
- agent-native-designSkill
- aihotSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- alipay-payment-integrationSkill
- animateSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- api-designerSkill
- api-design-principlesSkill
- api-designSkill
- archifySkill
- architecture-designerSkill
- architecture-patternsSkill
- arrangeSkill
- asta-skillSkill
- auditSkill
- auth-implementation-patternsSkill
- awesome-design-mdSkill
- ax-auditSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- bangumi-framesSkill
- bolderSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- brandkitSkill
- browser-skillSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- build-mcp-appSkill
- build-mcpbSkill
- build-mcp-serverSkill
- byted-seedance-video-generateSkill
- byted-seedream-image-generateSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- chart-visualizationSkill
- chrome-cdpSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- clarifySkill
- claude-apiSkill
- claude-automation-recommenderSkill
- claude-md-improverSkill
- cli-developerSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- colorizeSkill
- command-developmentSkill
- computer-useSkill
- consulting-analysisSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- cqrs-implementationSkill
- creating-mermaid-diagramsSkill
- critiqueSkill
- data-analysisSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

