agentleFS
zerniezernie/vigiles/skills/strengthen/SKILL.md

strengthen

Skill15 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Upgrade a vigiles spec's guidance() rules to enforce() — scan the guidance rules in a CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md spec and find existing linter rules (ESLint, Ruff, Clippy, Pylint, RuboCop, Stylelint) that back them. Use when asked to strengthen, harden, or make vigiles rules enforceable; NOT for general linting or fixing lint errors.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Default to interactive if the user doesn't specify.

    line 24
  2. Very specific:

    Run npx vigiles generate types to get the full list of enabled linter rules in the project.

    line 28
  3. Distinctive:

    If a match is found and the rule is in the generated types (meaning it's already enabled), this is a direct replacement — no config changes …

    line 46
  4. Distinctive:

    Check the plugin tables and decision matrices.

    line 61
  5. Very specific:

    When suggesting a no-restricted-* change:

    line 107
  6. Very specific:

    Run npm run build && npx vigiles compile to verify each change compiles

    line 159
  7. Distinctive:

    If any compilation fails, revert that specific change and report the error

    line 160
  8. Distinctive:

    Commit all successful changes

    line 161
  9. Distinctive:

    Ask the user which suggestions to apply

    line 167
  10. Very specific:

    Run npm run build && npx vigiles compile to verify

    line 169
  11. Distinctive:

    If compilation fails, report the error and revert

    line 170

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Scan spec files for guidance() rules and suggest enforce() replacements backed by real linter rules.

Principle: auto the free wins, nudge for the costs

The dividing line is cost, not strictness. A guidance() → enforce() swap where the linter rule already exists and is enabled is a pure win — free, reversible, no false-positive risk — so apply it (Tier 1 below). Anything that costs something — editing linter config, installing a plugin, or a change that could fail a clean CI — is the user's call: present it with the tradeoff spelled out and let them choose (Tiers 2–4). Never silently edit config, install a dependency, or escalate the repo into strict gating. This is the init enforcement model (structural = on by default, workflow/strict = opt-in) applied at edit time.

Instructions

Step 0: Choose Mode

Ask the user:

Auto or interactive?

  • Auto — I'll apply all safe changes (direct replacements where the rule is already enabled), commit, and show you the diff. Risky changes (require config edits or plugin installs) go in a summary for you to review.
  • Interactive — I'll present each suggestion and you pick which ones to apply.

Default to interactive if the user doesn't specify.

Step 1: Discover What's Installed

Run npx vigiles generate types to get the full list of enabled linter rules in the project. Read .vigiles/generated.d.ts to see every rule available across all detected linters.

Note which linter prefixes appear in the generated types (e.g., EslintRule, RuffRule). You'll only need reference docs for detected linters.

Step 2: Find All Guidance Rules

Find all .spec.ts files in the project (**/*.md.spec.ts). For each file, identify every guidance() rule.

Step 3: Match Against Generated Types (Fast Path)

For each guidance rule, check if an enabled rule in .vigiles/generated.d.ts directly matches. This is the fast, deterministic path — no doc reading needed.

Look for:

  • Exact rule name in text — guidance says "no-console" and no-console is in EslintRule
  • Semantic match — guidance says "don't use console.log" and no-console is available
  • Rule description match — guidance says "unused variables" and no-unused-vars or @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars is available

If a match is found and the rule is in the generated types (meaning it's already enabled), this is a direct replacement — no config changes needed.

Step 4: Read Linter Docs (Slow Path)

For guidance rules that didn't match in Step 3, read the linter reference docs for the project's detected linters:

  • ESLint → ../linter-docs/eslint.md
  • Stylelint → ../linter-docs/stylelint.md
  • Ruff → ../linter-docs/ruff.md
  • Pylint → ../linter-docs/pylint.md
  • RuboCop → ../linter-docs/rubocop.md
  • Clippy → ../linter-docs/clippy.md

Only read docs for linters the project actually uses. Skip docs for linters with no rules in generated types.

Check the plugin tables and decision matrices. The guidance text may describe a pattern covered by:

  • A plugin rule that's installed but not enabled
  • A plugin that's not installed yet
  • A no-restricted-* config pattern (see Step 4b)

Step 4b: no-restricted-* Patterns

Many guidance rules can be enforced via built-in linter config without a custom rule. This is the most common strengthen pattern — "don't do X" maps to a restriction config.

ESLint:

// "Don't import from internal modules"
"no-restricted-imports": ["error", {
  patterns: [{ group: ["src/internal/*"], message: "Use the public API." }]
}],

// "Don't call console.log"
"no-restricted-syntax": ["error", {
  selector: 'CallExpression[callee.object.name="console"]',
  message: "Use the project logger."
}],

// "Don't use moment.js"
"no-restricted-imports": ["error", {
  paths: [{ name: "moment", message: "Use dayjs instead." }]
}],

Ruff:

# "Don't use os.system"
[tool.ruff.lint.flake8-tidy-imports.banned-api]
"os.system".msg = "Use subprocess.run instead."

RuboCop:

# "Don't use puts in production" — if Rails/Output doesn't fit
Custom/NoPuts:
  Enabled: true

When suggesting a no-restricted-* change:

  1. Show the exact config edit needed (which file, which section)
  2. Show the enforce() rule that references it
  3. Note that this changes linter config, not just the spec

Step 5: Present Suggestions

Group the output into tiers:

Tier 1: Direct replacements (rule already enabled — zero risk)

// Before
"no-console": guidance("Use structured logger instead of console.log"),
// After
"no-console": enforce("eslint/no-console", "Use structured logger instead of console.log"),

Tier 2: Config-backed (rule exists but needs config options)

// Spec change:
"no-moment": enforce("eslint/no-restricted-imports", "Use dayjs instead of moment."),

// Config change needed (eslint.config.mjs):
"no-restricted-imports": ["error", {
  paths: [{ name: "moment", message: "Use dayjs instead." }]
}],

Tier 3: Plugin install needed

"cognitive-complexity": guidance("Keep functions simple")
→ Install eslint-plugin-sonarjs, enable sonarjs/cognitive-complexity
→ enforce("eslint/sonarjs/cognitive-complexity", "Keep functions simple")

Tier 4: No match (stays as guidance — candidate for a future rule-synthesis skill)

"research-first": guidance("Google unfamiliar APIs first.")
→ No linter rule can enforce this. Stays as guidance for now.
→ (Custom-rule synthesis is planned but not yet shipped.)

Step 6: Apply Changes

In auto mode:

  1. Apply all Tier 1 changes (edit spec files, replace guidance() with enforce())
  2. Run npm run build && npx vigiles compile to verify each change compiles
  3. If any compilation fails, revert that specific change and report the error
  4. Commit all successful changes
  5. Present Tier 2-4 as a summary for the user to review

In interactive mode:

  1. Present all tiers
  2. Ask the user which suggestions to apply
  3. For approved Tier 2 changes: edit the linter config, then edit the spec
  4. Run npm run build && npx vigiles compile to verify
  5. If compilation fails, report the error and revert

For Tier 4 (no match): Tell the user these rules stay as guidance — custom-rule synthesis is a planned skill, not yet available.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.