strengthen
Skill15 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Upgrade a vigiles spec's guidance() rules to enforce() — scan the guidance rules in a CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md spec and find existing linter rules (ESLint, Ruff, Clippy, Pylint, RuboCop, Stylelint) that back them. Use when asked to strengthen, harden, or make vigiles rules enforceable; NOT for general linting or fixing lint errors.
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- examples/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- src/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- add-a-linterSkill
- audience-checkSkill
- audit-feedback-loopSkill
- code-qualitySkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dogfood-cliSkill
- enforce-rules-formatSkill
- generate-logoSkill
- hexagonal-architectureSkill
- landing-siteSkill
- pr-to-lint-ruleSkill
- review-docsSkill
- screenshotSkill
- ship-a-featureSkill
- verify-docs-findableSkill
- pr-to-lint-ruleSkill
- adopt-specSkill
- debug-my-harnessSkill
- edit-specSkill
- linter-docsSkill
- test-harnessSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 24
Default to interactive if the user doesn't specify.
- Very specific: line 28
Run npx vigiles generate types to get the full list of enabled linter rules in the project.
- Distinctive: line 46
If a match is found and the rule is in the generated types (meaning it's already enabled), this is a direct replacement — no config changes …
- Distinctive: line 61
Check the plugin tables and decision matrices.
- Very specific: line 107
When suggesting a no-restricted-* change:
- Very specific: line 159
Run npm run build && npx vigiles compile to verify each change compiles
- Distinctive: line 160
If any compilation fails, revert that specific change and report the error
- Distinctive: line 161
Commit all successful changes
- Distinctive: line 167
Ask the user which suggestions to apply
- Very specific: line 169
Run npm run build && npx vigiles compile to verify
- Distinctive: line 170
If compilation fails, report the error and revert
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Scan spec files for guidance() rules and suggest enforce() replacements backed by real linter rules.
Principle: auto the free wins, nudge for the costs
The dividing line is cost, not strictness. A guidance() → enforce() swap where the linter rule already exists and is enabled is a pure win — free, reversible, no false-positive risk — so apply it (Tier 1 below). Anything that costs something — editing linter config, installing a plugin, or a change that could fail a clean CI — is the user's call: present it with the tradeoff spelled out and let them choose (Tiers 2–4). Never silently edit config, install a dependency, or escalate the repo into strict gating. This is the init enforcement model (structural = on by default, workflow/strict = opt-in) applied at edit time.
Instructions
Step 0: Choose Mode
Ask the user:
Auto or interactive?
- Auto — I'll apply all safe changes (direct replacements where the rule is already enabled), commit, and show you the diff. Risky changes (require config edits or plugin installs) go in a summary for you to review.
- Interactive — I'll present each suggestion and you pick which ones to apply.
Default to interactive if the user doesn't specify.
Step 1: Discover What's Installed
Run npx vigiles generate types to get the full list of enabled linter rules in the project. Read .vigiles/generated.d.ts to see every rule available across all detected linters.
Note which linter prefixes appear in the generated types (e.g., EslintRule, RuffRule). You'll only need reference docs for detected linters.
Step 2: Find All Guidance Rules
Find all .spec.ts files in the project (**/*.md.spec.ts). For each file, identify every guidance() rule.
Step 3: Match Against Generated Types (Fast Path)
For each guidance rule, check if an enabled rule in .vigiles/generated.d.ts directly matches. This is the fast, deterministic path — no doc reading needed.
Look for:
- Exact rule name in text — guidance says "no-console" and
no-consoleis in EslintRule - Semantic match — guidance says "don't use console.log" and
no-consoleis available - Rule description match — guidance says "unused variables" and
no-unused-varsor@typescript-eslint/no-unused-varsis available
If a match is found and the rule is in the generated types (meaning it's already enabled), this is a direct replacement — no config changes needed.
Step 4: Read Linter Docs (Slow Path)
For guidance rules that didn't match in Step 3, read the linter reference docs for the project's detected linters:
- ESLint →
../linter-docs/eslint.md - Stylelint →
../linter-docs/stylelint.md - Ruff →
../linter-docs/ruff.md - Pylint →
../linter-docs/pylint.md - RuboCop →
../linter-docs/rubocop.md - Clippy →
../linter-docs/clippy.md
Only read docs for linters the project actually uses. Skip docs for linters with no rules in generated types.
Check the plugin tables and decision matrices. The guidance text may describe a pattern covered by:
- A plugin rule that's installed but not enabled
- A plugin that's not installed yet
- A
no-restricted-*config pattern (see Step 4b)
Step 4b: no-restricted-* Patterns
Many guidance rules can be enforced via built-in linter config without a custom rule. This is the most common strengthen pattern — "don't do X" maps to a restriction config.
ESLint:
// "Don't import from internal modules"
"no-restricted-imports": ["error", {
patterns: [{ group: ["src/internal/*"], message: "Use the public API." }]
}],
// "Don't call console.log"
"no-restricted-syntax": ["error", {
selector: 'CallExpression[callee.object.name="console"]',
message: "Use the project logger."
}],
// "Don't use moment.js"
"no-restricted-imports": ["error", {
paths: [{ name: "moment", message: "Use dayjs instead." }]
}],Ruff:
# "Don't use os.system"
[tool.ruff.lint.flake8-tidy-imports.banned-api]
"os.system".msg = "Use subprocess.run instead."RuboCop:
# "Don't use puts in production" — if Rails/Output doesn't fit
Custom/NoPuts:
Enabled: trueWhen suggesting a no-restricted-* change:
- Show the exact config edit needed (which file, which section)
- Show the
enforce()rule that references it - Note that this changes linter config, not just the spec
Step 5: Present Suggestions
Group the output into tiers:
Tier 1: Direct replacements (rule already enabled — zero risk)
// Before
"no-console": guidance("Use structured logger instead of console.log"),
// After
"no-console": enforce("eslint/no-console", "Use structured logger instead of console.log"),Tier 2: Config-backed (rule exists but needs config options)
// Spec change:
"no-moment": enforce("eslint/no-restricted-imports", "Use dayjs instead of moment."),
// Config change needed (eslint.config.mjs):
"no-restricted-imports": ["error", {
paths: [{ name: "moment", message: "Use dayjs instead." }]
}],Tier 3: Plugin install needed
"cognitive-complexity": guidance("Keep functions simple")
→ Install eslint-plugin-sonarjs, enable sonarjs/cognitive-complexity
→ enforce("eslint/sonarjs/cognitive-complexity", "Keep functions simple")Tier 4: No match (stays as guidance — candidate for a future rule-synthesis skill)
"research-first": guidance("Google unfamiliar APIs first.")
→ No linter rule can enforce this. Stays as guidance for now.
→ (Custom-rule synthesis is planned but not yet shipped.)Step 6: Apply Changes
In auto mode:
- Apply all Tier 1 changes (edit spec files, replace
guidance()withenforce()) - Run
npm run build && npx vigiles compileto verify each change compiles - If any compilation fails, revert that specific change and report the error
- Commit all successful changes
- Present Tier 2-4 as a summary for the user to review
In interactive mode:
- Present all tiers
- Ask the user which suggestions to apply
- For approved Tier 2 changes: edit the linter config, then edit the spec
- Run
npm run build && npx vigiles compileto verify - If compilation fails, report the error and revert
For Tier 4 (no match): Tell the user these rules stay as guidance — custom-rule synthesis is a planned skill, not yet available.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

