agentleFS
zerniezernie/vigiles/skills/edit-spec/SKILL.md

edit-spec

Skill15 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Edit a vigiles .spec.ts to change a compiled instruction file (CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md) — add, modify, or remove a rule, section, command, or file pointer (including a request to add a "key file" — the keyFiles field is deprecated). Use whenever you need to change a CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md that carries a vigiles hash (edit the spec, never the artifact), including adding a new enforce()/check()/guidance() rule.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Look for spec files in the repo root:

    line 24
  2. Very specific:

    If no spec exists: if there's a hand-written CLAUDE.md, suggest the adopt-spec skill.

    line 30
  3. Very specific:

    Read the spec file. It's a TypeScript file that exports a claude() call with these fields:

    line 35
  4. Very specific:

    Add to the rules object with a kebab-case key derived from the intent, preserving alphabetical order if the existing rules are alphabetical.

    line 97
  5. Very specific:

    Do NOT add # or ## headers inside sections — they break the document structure

    line 104
  6. Very specific:

    Add to commands. The compiler verifies it against package.json scripts.

    line 108
  7. Distinctive:

    Keep the description to one line (aim for 120 characters, never exceed ~200): the instruction file is loaded on EVERY request.

    line 109
  8. Very specific:

    only if nothing else would lead an agent there → a one-line pointer, ${file("src/services/auth.ts")} inside a prose section where the …

    line 124
  9. Distinctive:

    After editing the spec, run:

    line 137
  10. Very specific:

    If the vigiles plugin is installed (/plugin marketplace add zernie/vigiles then /plugin install vigiles@vigiles, or npx vigiles init), the …

    line 156

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Edit a .spec.ts file to update the project's instruction files. The spec is the source of truth — CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md are compiled build artifacts that must not be edited directly.

Arguments

$ARGUMENTS — What the user wants to change. Examples:

  • "add a rule about always using the custom logger"
  • "update the architecture section"
  • "point the auth rule at src/services/auth.ts"
  • "add npm run lint to commands"
  • "change the testing guidance"

Instructions

Step 1: Find the Spec

Look for spec files in the repo root:

  • CLAUDE.md.spec.ts — source for CLAUDE.md
  • AGENTS.md.spec.ts — source for AGENTS.md
  • Any *.spec.ts matching instruction files

If no spec exists: if there's a hand-written CLAUDE.md, suggest the adopt-spec skill; otherwise suggest npx vigiles init to scaffold one.

Step 2: Read and Understand the Spec

Read the spec file. It's a TypeScript file that exports a claude() call with these fields:

import { claude, enforce, guidance, check, every } from "vigiles/spec";

export default claude({
  // Optional: output target (defaults to "CLAUDE.md")
  target: "CLAUDE.md",
  // or multi-target:
  // target: ["CLAUDE.md", "AGENTS.md"],

  // Prose sections — become ## headings in compiled output
  sections: {
    positioning: "What this project does...",
    architecture: "How the codebase is structured...",
  },

  // (No `keyFiles` — deprecated; see "A pointer to a file" in Step 3.)

  // Commands verified against package.json
  commands: {
    "npm run build": "Compile the project",
    "npm test": "Run all tests",
  },

  // Rules — three types
  rules: {
    // enforce() — backed by a linter rule, verified to exist AND be enabled
    "no-any": enforce(
      "@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any",
      "Use unknown and narrow with type guards.",
    ),

    // check() — filesystem assertion run by vigiles
    "test-pairing": check(
      every("src/**/*.service.ts").has("{name}.test.ts"),
      "Every service must have tests.",
    ),

    // guidance() — prose only, no enforcement
    "research-first": guidance("Google unfamiliar APIs before implementing."),
  },
});

Step 3: Make the Changes

Based on what the user asked for:

Adding a rule (this absorbs the old generate-rule skill):

  • Classify the rule from the request:
    • enforce() — a linter rule can back it. Check the project's linter configs (ESLint, Ruff, Clippy, Pylint, RuboCop, Stylelint) for a matching rule; also consider an architectural tool (ast-grep, Dependency Cruiser, Steiger). If uncertain whether a rule exists, ask the user rather than guessing.
    • check() — a filesystem structural convention ("every X needs a Y"). Only for file-pairing; never for code content.
    • guidance() — can't be mechanically enforced (subjective conventions, process rules, migration context).
  • For enforce(): use the real linter rule name (e.g. eslint/no-console, @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any, ruff/T201).
  • Add to the rules object with a kebab-case key derived from the intent, preserving alphabetical order if the existing rules are alphabetical. Import any new builders needed (e.g. check and every for the first check()).

Updating a section:

  • Edit the string in sections. Sections are plain strings or tagged template literals with file(), cmd(), ref() for verified references
  • Do NOT add # or ## headers inside sections — they break the document structure

Adding a command:

  • Add to commands. The compiler verifies it against package.json scripts.
  • Keep the description to one line (aim for 120 characters, never exceed ~200): the instruction file is loaded on EVERY request.

A pointer to a file (what used to be a "key file"):

  • 🔴 Never add a keyFiles entry — not one, not even to a spec that already has the field. It is deprecated (vigiles lint reports it as deprecated-key-files) and removed in the next major: it compiles a file map into the instruction file loaded on every request, and the agent finds files itself.
  • Asked to add a file? Place it by the first of these that fits, and say why:
    1. the file's own header, the docs or the path already say it → add nothing;
    2. a fact about that one file → write it in the file's header comment;
    3. a rule an agent must follow while working in one folder → that folder's nested CLAUDE.md (its own <folder>/CLAUDE.md.spec.ts, compiled);
    4. only if nothing else would lead an agent there → a one-line pointer, ${file("src/services/auth.ts")} inside a prose section where the decision that needs it is written — compile verifies it exists, exactly as it verified a keyFiles path. (guidance() takes a plain string, so a path typed there is not verified.)
  • Opened a spec that still has keyFiles? Propose removing it, in the same reply: go through the entries with the same four steps (the full recipe is docs/rules/deprecated-key-files.md in the vigiles repository; a path that no longer exists is deleted) and show, per entry, where it goes and why. Where each entry goes is the user's call; apply it once they confirm.

Step 4: Compile

After editing the spec, run:

npx vigiles compile

This regenerates the compiled instruction file(s). Review the output for any errors:

  • stale-file — a file() (or deprecated keyFiles) path doesn't exist
  • stale-command — a command isn't in package.json
  • invalid-rule — a linter rule doesn't exist or is disabled
  • section-has-header — a section contains # headers (break into separate named sections)

Step 5: Verify

npx vigiles lint

If the vigiles plugin is installed (/plugin marketplace add zernie/vigiles then /plugin install vigiles@vigiles, or npx vigiles init), the PostToolUse hook recompiles automatically after you save the spec.

Important

  • Do what's asked; don't silently escalate enforcement. Add the rule the user asked for. If making it an enforce() would need a linter-config edit or a plugin install (a cost), or if it could fail a clean CI, say so and let the user choose — don't change linter config or flip on strict / workflow gating on your own. A pure win (a rule that's already enabled) you can just apply. The strengthen skill owns guidance() → enforce() upgrades.
  • Never edit CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md directly — they have a vigiles hash comment and are build artifacts
  • The spec is TypeScript — you get type checking, autocomplete, and verified references
  • enforce() rules are verified — the compiler checks the rule exists AND is enabled in your linter config
  • Sections must not contain # or ## headers — use separate named sections instead

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.