discover
Skill517 starsChanged 3 days agoMITView on GitHub
Full execution protocol for MODE: DISCOVER -- read-only repository discovery and governance/context mapping.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 45 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 19
Run symbols tool on key files identified by explorer to understand public API surfaces
- Very specific: line 21
Run complexity_hotspots if not already run during project discovery (check context.md for existing analysis).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 45 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Discover Protocol
This protocol is loaded on demand by the architect runtime. The architect prompt keeps only activation, action, and hard safety constraints; the full execution details live here.
MODE: DISCOVER
Delegate to the active swarm's explorer agent. Wait for response. For complex tasks, make a second explorer call focused on risk/gap analysis:
- Hidden requirements, unstated assumptions, scope risks
- Existing patterns that the implementation must follow After explorer returns:
- Run
symbolstool on key files identified by explorer to understand public API surfaces - For multi-file module surveys: prefer
batch_symbolsover sequential single-file symbols calls - Run
complexity_hotspotsif not already run during project discovery (check context.md for existing analysis). Note modules with recommendation "security_review" or "full_gates" in context.md. - Check for project governance files using the
globtool with patternsproject-instructions.md,docs/project-instructions.md,CONTRIBUTING.md,INSTRUCTIONS.md,AGENTS.md, andCLAUDE.md(process all matches found). For each file found: read it and extract all MUST (mandatory constraints) and SHOULD (recommended practices) rules. Write the extracted rules to.swarm/context.mdunder a## Project Governancesection — append if the section exists, create it if not — PRESERVING PROVENANCE for every rule (issue #2131 finding 9): each entry records (a) its source file, (b) the subtree scope the file declares or implies (repo-wide when undeclared), (c) precedence —AGENTS.md/project-instructions.mdoutrankCONTRIBUTING.md/INSTRUCTIONS.md/CLAUDE.mdwhen rules conflict, (d) strength (MUST vs SHOULD), and (e) a conflict flag naming the other file whose rule it contradicts, if any. Never flatten conflicting rules into one; surface the conflict. If no MUST or SHOULD rules are found in the file, skip writing. If no governance file is found: skip silently. Existing DISCOVER steps are unchanged.
Other versions53 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 517100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 52
- skyllwt/OmegaWiki★ 1.7ksame name
- DAIR-AutoResearch/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- PKU-DAIR/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- skyllwt/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- suboss87/FDEOps★ 940same name
- hsantanna88/clo-author★ 262same name
- hugosantanna/clo-author★ 262same name
- fw-ai/cookbook★ 238same name
- kv0906/pm-kit★ 138same name
- ambient-code/platform★ 131same name
42 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use daily-arxiv, exp-eval and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
LambenthanSkilldaily-arxiv
每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新
Also in 5 projects that use this
LambenthanSkillexp-eval
实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges
Also in 5 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-eval
Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-run
Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.
Also in 4 projects that use this
phanghonghaoSkillposter
HTML/CSS A4 海报生成。从沙龙/活动 Markdown 文件生成科技风 A4 海报 PDF/PNG。Use when user mentions: poster, 海报, 海报生成, make poster, generate poster, 活动海报, 沙龙海报.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +6 more from Lambenthan
- +1 more from skyllwt
In this repository66 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- ci-fix-monitorSkill
- codebase-review-swarmSkill
- commit-prSkill
- contributingSkill
- engineering-conventionsSkill
- fork-pr-operationsSkill
- guardrail-patternsSkill
- issue-tracerSkill
- mock-to-internals-migrationSkill
- pr-review-fixSkill
- qa-sweepSkill
- research-firstSkill
- running-testsSkill
- subprocess-safetySkill
- swarm-ci-monitorSkill
- swarm-implementSkill
- swarm-pr-feedbackSkill
- swarm-pr-reviewSkill
- swarm-pr-subscribeSkill
- swarmSkill
- tech-debt-ci-reviewSkill
- test-file-splitSkill
- unswarmSkill
- writing-testsSkill
- brainstormSkill
- clarifySkill
- clarify-specSkill
- codebase-review-swarmSkill
- commit-prSkill
- consultSkill
- councilSkill
- critic-gateSkill
- deep-diveSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- design-docsSkill
- durable-session-stateSkill
- editing-skillsSkill
- engineering-conventionsSkill
- executeSkill
- fork-pr-operationsSkill
- graphifySkill
- issue-ingestSkill
- issue-tracerSkill
- orchestrating-subagentsSkill
- phase-wrapSkill
- pre-phase-briefingSkill
- qa-sweepSkill
- research-firstSkill
- rust-crate-ciSkill
- specifySkill
- swarm-ci-monitorSkill
- swarm-implementSkill
- swarm-planSkill
- swarm-pr-feedbackSkill
- swarm-pr-reviewSkill
- swarm-pr-subscribeSkill
- swarm-resumeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

