ci-fix-monitor
Skill517 starsChanged 3 days agoMITView on GitHub
Codex adapter for monitoring and fixing CI failures on opencode-swarm PRs. Use when diagnosing failed checks, fixing `package-check` (npm tarball) failures, resolving quality/lint/format errors, fixing macOS cross-platform file I/O failures, or watching a PR until all checks are green.
- Deletes or force-pushes
- Commits and pushes
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Very specific: line 10
Read .opencode/skills/ci-fix-monitor/SKILL.md for the full protocol.
- Very specific: line 25
After any source fix, run the focused test file (bun test <file>) before committing.
- Very specific: line 26
Do not declare victory until ALL required checks show green.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
CI Fix Monitor
Read .opencode/skills/ci-fix-monitor/SKILL.md for the full protocol.
Also load:
.agents/skills/commit-pr/SKILL.mdbefore committing or pushing any fix.agents/skills/engineering-conventions/SKILL.mdif the fix touches source files.agents/skills/running-tests/SKILL.mdbefore running any test suite as part of a fix
Codex-specific execution notes:
- MCP tool names (
mcp__github__*) are injected by the runtime harness and may differ across environments. Verify availability viaToolSearchbefore first use in a session. - No
ghCLI available. Usemcp__github__pull_request_read(methodget_check_runs) to list check status andmcp__github__get_job_logs(withreturn_content: true) to fetch failure logs. - For
package-checkfailures:package-checkvalidates the npm tarball (npm pack+ tarball contents). A failure is a source/build/package-manifest problem, not generated-file drift.dist/is generated and NOT committed — do not stage it; runbun run buildlocally only when you need the bundle to verify (e.g.node --input-type=module -e "await import('./dist/index.js'); console.log('dist import OK')"). There is no longer a committed-dist drift check. - For a branch behind main (version-drift):
git fetch origin main && git rebase origin/main(abort withgit rebase --abortif conflicts occur and escalate to user), thengit push --force-with-lease origin <branch>. Force-push is required and expected after rebase. - For format violations:
bunx biome format --write <specific-file>— do NOT runbiome format --write .on the whole repo. - After any source fix, run the focused test file (
bun test <file>) before committing. - Do not declare victory until ALL required checks show green;
skippedis acceptable only if the same check was skipped on the base branch.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 517100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository66 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- codebase-review-swarmSkill
- commit-prSkill
- contributingSkill
- engineering-conventionsSkill
- fork-pr-operationsSkill
- guardrail-patternsSkill
- issue-tracerSkill
- mock-to-internals-migrationSkill
- pr-review-fixSkill
- qa-sweepSkill
- research-firstSkill
- running-testsSkill
- subprocess-safetySkill
- swarm-ci-monitorSkill
- swarm-implementSkill
- swarm-pr-feedbackSkill
- swarm-pr-reviewSkill
- swarm-pr-subscribeSkill
- swarmSkill
- tech-debt-ci-reviewSkill
- test-file-splitSkill
- unswarmSkill
- writing-testsSkill
- brainstormSkill
- clarifySkill
- clarify-specSkill
- codebase-review-swarmSkill
- commit-prSkill
- consultSkill
- councilSkill
- critic-gateSkill
- deep-diveSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- design-docsSkill
- discoverSkill
- durable-session-stateSkill
- editing-skillsSkill
- engineering-conventionsSkill
- executeSkill
- fork-pr-operationsSkill
- graphifySkill
- issue-ingestSkill
- issue-tracerSkill
- orchestrating-subagentsSkill
- phase-wrapSkill
- pre-phase-briefingSkill
- qa-sweepSkill
- research-firstSkill
- rust-crate-ciSkill
- specifySkill
- swarm-ci-monitorSkill
- swarm-implementSkill
- swarm-planSkill
- swarm-pr-feedbackSkill
- swarm-pr-reviewSkill
- swarm-pr-subscribeSkill
- swarm-resumeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

