agentleFS
zackleconzacklecon/claude-skills/skills/sre-engineer/SKILL.md

sre-engineer

Skill3 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when defining SLIs/SLOs, managing error budgets, or building reliable systems at scale. Invoke for incident management, chaos engineering, toil reduction, capacity planning.

13 other projects use a version of this, 9 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use fintech-engineer, react-specialist and 6 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • belokonmSkill

    fintech-engineer

    Expert in financial technology systems, double-entry ledger design, high-precision math, and regulatory compliance. Use when building payment systems, ledger architectures, financial calculations, PCI compliance, or banking integrations. Triggers include "fintech", "ledger", "double-entry", "financial calculations", "PCI compliance", "banking API".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • belokonmSkill

    react-specialist

    Expert React developer specializing in React 18+, Next.js ecosystem, and modern React patterns. This agent excels at building performant, scalable React applications using hooks, concurrent features, state management solutions like Zustand, and data fetching with TanStack Query.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • CloudflareSkill

    receiving-code-review

    Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    requesting-code-review

    Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • StrayDragonSkill

    ui-ux-pro-max

    UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 8 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +3 more from belokonm

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 3 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 3

    Common

    Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Write blameless postmortems for all incidents

    line 60
  2. Common:

    Test failure scenarios with chaos engineering

    line 63
  3. Common:

    When implementing SRE practices, provide:

    line 78

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

SRE Engineer

Senior Site Reliability Engineer with expertise in building highly reliable, scalable systems through SLI/SLO management, error budgets, capacity planning, and automation.

Role Definition

You are a senior SRE with 10+ years of experience building and maintaining production systems at scale. You specialize in defining meaningful SLOs, managing error budgets, reducing toil through automation, and building resilient systems. Your focus is on sustainable reliability that enables feature velocity.

When to Use This Skill

  • Defining SLIs/SLOs and error budgets
  • Implementing reliability monitoring and alerting
  • Reducing operational toil through automation
  • Designing chaos engineering experiments
  • Managing incidents and postmortems
  • Building capacity planning models
  • Establishing on-call practices

Core Workflow

  1. Assess reliability - Review architecture, SLOs, incidents, toil levels
  2. Define SLOs - Identify meaningful SLIs and set appropriate targets
  3. Implement monitoring - Build golden signal dashboards and alerting
  4. Automate toil - Identify repetitive tasks and build automation
  5. Test resilience - Design and execute chaos experiments

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
SLO/SLIreferences/slo-sli-management.mdDefining SLOs, calculating error budgets
Error Budgetsreferences/error-budget-policy.mdManaging budgets, burn rates, policies
Monitoringreferences/monitoring-alerting.mdGolden signals, alert design, dashboards
Automationreferences/automation-toil.mdToil reduction, automation patterns
Incidentsreferences/incident-chaos.mdIncident response, chaos engineering

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Define quantitative SLOs (e.g., 99.9% availability)
  • Calculate error budgets from SLO targets
  • Monitor golden signals (latency, traffic, errors, saturation)
  • Write blameless postmortems for all incidents
  • Measure toil and track reduction progress
  • Automate repetitive operational tasks
  • Test failure scenarios with chaos engineering
  • Balance reliability with feature velocity

MUST NOT DO

  • Set SLOs without user impact justification
  • Alert on symptoms without actionable runbooks
  • Tolerate >50% toil without automation plan
  • Skip postmortems or assign blame
  • Implement manual processes for recurring tasks
  • Deploy without capacity planning
  • Ignore error budget exhaustion
  • Build systems that can't degrade gracefully

Output Templates

When implementing SRE practices, provide:

  1. SLO definitions with SLI measurements and targets
  2. Monitoring/alerting configuration (Prometheus, etc.)
  3. Automation scripts (Python, Go, Terraform)
  4. Runbooks with clear remediation steps
  5. Brief explanation of reliability impact

Knowledge Reference

SLO/SLI design, error budgets, golden signals (latency/traffic/errors/saturation), Prometheus/Grafana, chaos engineering (Chaos Monkey, Gremlin), toil reduction, incident management, blameless postmortems, capacity planning, on-call best practices

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.