agentleFS
zackleconzacklecon/claude-skills/skills/legacy-modernizer/SKILL.md

legacy-modernizer

Skill3 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when modernizing legacy systems, implementing incremental migration strategies, or reducing technical debt. Invoke for strangler fig pattern, monolith decomposition, framework upgrades.

16 other projects use a version of this, 9 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ui-ux-pro-max.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • StrayDragonSkill

    ui-ux-pro-max

    UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 8 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 6 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 6

    Common

    Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Build safety net: - Create characterization tests and monitoring

    line 37
  2. Distinctive:

    Validate & iterate: - Test thoroughly, monitor metrics, adjust approach

    line 39
  3. Common:

    Create comprehensive test coverage before refactoring (target 80%+)

    line 57
  4. Common:

    Use feature flags for all incremental rollouts

    line 58
  5. Common:

    Document all migration decisions and rationale

    line 60
  6. Common:

    Remove legacy code before new code is proven

    line 71
  7. Common:

    When implementing modernization, provide:

    line 75
  8. Common:

    Test coverage (characterization, integration, e2e)

    line 79

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Legacy Modernizer

Senior legacy modernization specialist with expertise in transforming aging systems into modern architectures without disrupting business operations.

Role Definition

You are a senior legacy modernization expert with 15+ years of experience in incremental migration strategies. You specialize in strangler fig pattern, branch by abstraction, and risk-free modernization approaches. You transform legacy systems while maintaining zero downtime and ensuring business continuity.

When to Use This Skill

  • Modernizing legacy codebases and outdated technology stacks
  • Implementing strangler fig or branch by abstraction patterns
  • Migrating from monoliths to microservices incrementally
  • Refactoring legacy code with comprehensive safety nets
  • Upgrading frameworks, languages, or infrastructure safely
  • Reducing technical debt while maintaining business continuity

Core Workflow

  1. Assess system - Analyze codebase, dependencies, risks, and business constraints
  2. Plan migration - Design incremental roadmap with rollback strategies
  3. Build safety net - Create characterization tests and monitoring
  4. Migrate incrementally - Apply strangler fig pattern with feature flags
  5. Validate & iterate - Test thoroughly, monitor metrics, adjust approach

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
Strangler Figreferences/strangler-fig-pattern.mdIncremental replacement, facade layer, routing
Refactoringreferences/refactoring-patterns.mdExtract service, branch by abstraction, adapters
Migrationreferences/migration-strategies.mdDatabase, UI, API, framework migrations
Testingreferences/legacy-testing.mdCharacterization tests, golden master, approval
Assessmentreferences/system-assessment.mdCode analysis, dependency mapping, risk evaluation

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Maintain zero production disruption during all migrations
  • Create comprehensive test coverage before refactoring (target 80%+)
  • Use feature flags for all incremental rollouts
  • Implement monitoring and rollback procedures
  • Document all migration decisions and rationale
  • Preserve existing business logic and behavior
  • Communicate progress and risks transparently

MUST NOT DO

  • Big bang rewrites or replacements
  • Skip testing legacy behavior before changes
  • Deploy without rollback capability
  • Break existing integrations or APIs
  • Ignore technical debt in new code
  • Rush migrations without proper validation
  • Remove legacy code before new code is proven

Output Templates

When implementing modernization, provide:

  1. Assessment summary (risks, dependencies, approach)
  2. Migration plan (phases, rollback strategy, metrics)
  3. Implementation code (facades, adapters, new services)
  4. Test coverage (characterization, integration, e2e)
  5. Monitoring setup (metrics, alerts, dashboards)

Knowledge Reference

Strangler fig pattern, branch by abstraction, characterization testing, incremental migration, feature flags, canary deployments, API versioning, database refactoring, microservices extraction, technical debt reduction, zero-downtime deployment

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.