unblock
Skill2 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when `.agenda` tasks or plans are blocked on decisions and the user wants them made ready to implement.
10 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- devbyshima/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- SylphxAI/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- bex-co/bextheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- thensls/nsls-personal-toolkittheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- yogesh-dhande/spaces-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 1, 2026
- Yosei-Lab-ai/Miragoetheir own version, first seen Aug 19, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use retro and ship.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 10
- bex-co/bex★ 576same name
- nikosdion/devskills★ 4same name
- fernandoxavier02/Pipeline-Orchestrator★ 1same name
- madeehahassan/plsbuild-os★ 1same name
- Markuysa/vibe-coding-template★ 1same name
- SylphxAI/skills★ 1same name
- thensls/nsls-personal-toolkit★ 1same name
- yogesh-dhande/spaces-skills★ 1same name
- devbyshima/skills★ 0same name
- Yosei-Lab-ai/Miragoe★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository78 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- global/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adaptSkill
- agenda-cleanSkill
- agenda-implementSkill
- agenda-plan-createSkill
- agenda-plan-refineSkill
- agenda-readinessSkill
- agenda-roadmapSkill
- agendaSkill
- agenda-task-createSkill
- agents-md-compressSkill
- agents-md-initSkill
- approachSkill
- autopilotSkill
- carefulSkill
- checksSkill
- cliSkill
- criteriaSkill
- cryptographySkill
- debug-cleanupSkill
- debugSkill
- debug-traceSkill
- decideSkill
- dependency-addSkill
- dependency-judgeSkill
- dependency-tree-compressSkill
- edge-caseSkill
- exploreSkill
- fallbacksSkill
- fast-modeSkill
- fix-lintsSkill
- formal-verificationSkill
- fragileSkill
- gaps-recordSkill
- gaps-settleSkill
- gapsSkill
- git-commitSkill
- git-worktree-finishSkill
- git-worktree-pruneSkill
- git-worktreeSkill
- harvestSkill
- instructionsSkill
- interviewSkill
- nix-flake-initSkill
- nixSkill
- optionsSkill
- pattern-kernelSkill
- pattern-state-machineSkill
- pattern-versioningSkill
- pendingSkill
- readonlySkill
- recommendedSkill
- referenceSkill
- research-literatureSkill
- researchSkill
- research-webSkill
- review-assumptionsSkill
- review-bugsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
11
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 22
Follow /agenda for the workspace layout, filename statuses, the not-ready disclaimer, and plan sections.
- Distinctive: line 27
Named entries: When the user names tasks or plans, by ID, title, or path, take exactly those.
- Distinctive: line 34
Skip, without asking,: every other class: entries another agent is working on, exploratory or deferred entries, entries waiting on …
- Distinctive: line 37
Limit to 20: When more than 20 candidates remain, take the 20 most recently created or edited.
- Very specific: line 45
Before collecting candidates, release abandoned claims so their entries can be picked up again.
- Very specific: line 50
Check each claimant with /agenda-readiness's Activity rules.
- Very specific: line 55
Remove both claim lines and append a note naming the previous assignee and branch, and recording any stale worktree or session so the next …
- Very specific: line 78
Decide with
/decide: Run it for each decision or group. - Distinctive: line 83
Lock technical decisions: Update each entry right away, so the results survive an interruption:
- Very specific: line 85
Tasks: remove the answered items from ## Open Decisions and add each answer to a ## Decisions section with the choice and a one-line …
- Very specific: line 91
When no open decision remains, remove both the > Not ready: disclaimer and the empty ## Open Decisions section.
- Very specific: line 99
Do not drop work on your own: If /decide concludes an entry should not be done at all, treat that as a human-required decision instead of …
- Distinctive: line 130
If nothing was in scope, say so and list the skipped entries.
- Very specific: line 134
Do not implement tasks or plan items.
- Very specific: line 136
Do not change entry IDs, rename statuses beyond what /agenda requires, or delete entries.
- Distinctive: line 138
Do not run destructive, costly, outward-facing, or live system-state operations while researching or deciding.
- Very specific: line 140
Do not commit unless the user asks.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Unblock
Objective
Turn .agenda tasks and plans that are blocked only on decisions into ready
work. Settle each open technical decision with /decide and lock in its
recommendation, ask the user only about decisions a person must own, and update
the entries so /pending lists them as ready. This skill decides and edits
agenda entries; it does not implement them.
Invoking this skill is the user's delegation of technical decisions to the
agent. It overrides /decide's default of only proposing, and /agenda's rule
that not-ready entries wait for the user, for the decisions this skill may
settle on its own.
Follow /agenda for the workspace layout, filename statuses, the not-ready
disclaimer, and plan sections.
Scope
- Named entries. When the user names tasks or plans, by ID, title, or path, take exactly those. Process a named entry even if it looks exploratory, since naming it is the go-ahead; still apply the human-decision rule below.
- Otherwise, all candidates. Classify every task with
todoorin_progressstatus and every plan withplannedoractivestatus with/agenda-readiness, and take the ones it rates decision-blocked. - Skip, without asking, every other class: entries another agent is working on, exploratory or deferred entries, entries waiting on something other than a decision, and underspecified, manual, or already ready ones.
- Limit to 20. When more than 20 candidates remain, take the 20 most
recently created or edited. Order by the last commit touching each file
(
git log -1 --format=%ct -- <path>), treating uncommitted or untracked entries as newest and falling back to file modification time outside Git. Mention how many were left out.
Stale Claims
Before collecting candidates, release abandoned claims so their entries can be
picked up again. This runs on every invocation, whatever the Scope, and covers
every task, plan, and roadmap entry that carries an Assignee claim (see
/agenda):
- Check each claimant with
/agenda-readiness's Activity rules. Release the claim only when the claimant is stale: no matching session or worktree activity in the last 30 minutes, or no claimant found and the entry file unchanged for 30 minutes. Never release a claim whose agent is still active, and keep the current session's own claims. - Remove both claim lines and append a note naming the previous assignee and
branch, and recording any stale worktree or session so the next agent
resumes it. Keep the entry's ID, slug, and status, so an unfinished
in_progressoractiveentry stays that way. - Release the claim in the main checkout's copy, and in the claimant's worktree copy only when that worktree is stale and untouched; otherwise leave the worktree alone and report it.
Decision Types
Classify every open decision in an in-scope entry as technical or human, by
/decide's "Human versus technical decisions":
- Technical: decide it with
/decideand lock in its recommendation without asking. - Human-required: still run
/decideon it, then confirm with the user before locking it in (see Workflow).
Workflow
- Collect the candidates per Scope, apply the skips and the limit, and list each in-scope entry's open decisions. Group decisions that one coherent solution settles together, including across entries.
- Decide with
/decide. Run it for each decision or group. Scale its research to the decision: local research is enough for small choices; use web research when the choice turns on external facts, such as an upstream API, a release, or a known issue. Keep this phase read-only apart from the agenda edits below. - Lock technical decisions. Update each entry right away, so the results
survive an interruption:
- Tasks: remove the answered items from
## Open Decisionsand add each answer to a## Decisionssection with the choice and a one-line rationale. Fold any facts the research established into the description. - Plans: record each answer under
## Locked Decisionswith its rationale and the rejected alternatives, and update the items it affects, following/agenda-plan-refine's rules for a ready plan. - When no open decision remains, remove both the
> **Not ready:**disclaimer and the empty## Open Decisionssection.
- Tasks: remove the answered items from
- Confirm human-required decisions. Present them together, each marked
with
⚠️and carrying/decide's recommendation, rationale, and main risk, and ask the user with the available question tool, listing the recommendation first. Lock each answer as in step 3. Leave any decision the user does not answer in## Open Decisionswith the/decidefindings attached, so the next pass does not redo the research. - Do not drop work on your own. If
/decideconcludes an entry should not be done at all, treat that as a human-required decision instead of closing the entry. - Review each edited entry:
/agenda-readinessmust now rate it ready, manual when its remaining work acts on live external state, or decision-blocked when only human-required decisions remain. It must keep its ID and status and have no unrelated changes.
Report
List every in-scope entry with a status marker, then the skipped entries:
🔓 **Unblocked**
- 🟢 Task 12: Title — ready; decided: <choice>, <choice>
- ✋ Task 14: Title — decided: <choice>; manual: <live step needing you>
- 🟡 Plan 3: Title — waiting on your answer to ⚠️ <decision>
- 🔴 Task 9: Title — still blocked: <reason>
⏭️ Skipped: Task 7 (exploratory), Task 8 (waits on upstream release), 4 older entries over the limit
🔓 Released stale claims: Task 5 (`feature/x`, idle 3 days), Plan 2 (`main`, idle 2 hours)- 🟢 now ready to implement, ✋ decided but manual because its remaining work acts on live external state, 🟡 waiting only on a human-required decision you were asked about, 🔴 still blocked for another reason found while deciding.
- Then show the entries that became ready in
/pending's output format, so the user sees where they now rank among the ready work. - Show the released-claims line only when a claim was released.
- If nothing was in scope, say so and list the skipped entries.
Boundaries
- Do not implement tasks or plan items; use
/agenda-implementfor that once the user asks. - Do not change entry IDs, rename statuses beyond what
/agendarequires, or delete entries. - Do not run destructive, costly, outward-facing, or live system-state operations while researching or deciding.
- Do not commit unless the user asks; then use
/git-commit.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

