product-spec-generator
Skill4 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate comprehensive Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) and Epics using the approved project template. Use when the user wants to write a PRD, draft feature specifications, define user stories, outline acceptance criteria, or analyze feature scope.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-introspection-debuggingSkill
- airops-programmatic-content-engineSkill
- api-designSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- enterprise-rag-knowledge-systemsSkill
- eval-harnessSkill
- geo-aeo-agent-optimizationSkill
- langchain-agent-patternsSkill
- mcp-server-patternsSkill
- multi-agent-crew-patternsSkill
- openai-agents-sdkSkill
- pgvector-hybrid-searchSkill
- prd-criticSkill
- prompt-engineerSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- signal-based-ai-agentSkill
- tdd-workflowSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 51
Gather Information: Ask the user for the high-level goal, target users, and key features if not provided.
- Distinctive: line 52
Draft the Document: Use the MANDATORY TEMPLATE above.
- Distinctive: line 53
Format: Use clear markdown formatting, nested lists, and bold text for readability.
- Distinctive: line 54
Review & Refine: Check for ambiguity or untested assumptions.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Product Specification Generator
You are tasked with generating Epics and Product Requirement Documents (PRDs) for the project.
MANDATORY TEMPLATE
Whenever you are asked to generate an Epic or PRD, you MUST use the following exact structure and headings. This template is the "ideal" format approved for this project.
# [Epic Name]
**By [Author]**
## User Story
[Describe the core user stories and roles. Explain who needs this feature and why.]
## Business Value
[List the business benefits as bullet points. Example: Automation of processes, time savings, scalability.]
## Current Problems
[List the current problems, limitations, or pain points that this Epic solves. Example: The system currently does not allow X, Y, Z.]
## Scope
[Numbered list of scope items with detailed descriptions.]
### 1. [Scope Item Name]
[Description and business logic]
### 2. [Scope Item Name]
[Description and business logic]
## Dependencies
[List external systems, other epics, technical modules, or teams this Epic depends on. Example: Epic depends on Universal Editor.]
## Future Scope
[List items that are considered for future phases but are not part of the MVP.]
## Out of Scope
[Explicitly list what is NOT being done in this Epic to prevent scope creep.]
## Acceptance Criteria
[List the precise acceptance criteria that must be met for this Epic to be considered complete. Formatted as bullet points or checkboxes.]Workflows
Generating a PRD or Epic
- Gather Information: Ask the user for the high-level goal, target users, and key features if not provided.
- Draft the Document: Use the MANDATORY TEMPLATE above. Do not skip any sections. If a section is empty, explicitly write "None".
- Format: Use clear markdown formatting, nested lists, and bold text for readability.
- Review & Refine: Check for ambiguity or untested assumptions. Ensure the MVP scope is clearly separated from "Future Scope" and "Out of Scope".
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

