prd-critic
Skill4 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Evaluates PRD quality for clarity, testability, and build-readiness across problem clarity, scope, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and metrics. Use before sharing a PRD with engineering to catch gaps early.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- pruthivim/claude-pm-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 31, 2026
- euroconic/pm-claude-skillstheir own version, first seen May 27, 2026
- pratikshadake/claude-product-management-skillsword for word, first seen Feb 19, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- pratikshadake/claude-product-management-skills★ 33100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- pruthivim/claude-pm-skills★ 1same name
- euroconic/pm-claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-introspection-debuggingSkill
- airops-programmatic-content-engineSkill
- api-designSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- enterprise-rag-knowledge-systemsSkill
- eval-harnessSkill
- geo-aeo-agent-optimizationSkill
- langchain-agent-patternsSkill
- mcp-server-patternsSkill
- multi-agent-crew-patternsSkill
- openai-agents-sdkSkill
- pgvector-hybrid-searchSkill
- product-spec-generatorSkill
- prompt-engineerSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- signal-based-ai-agentSkill
- tdd-workflowSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
The file
Files
PRD Quality Critic
Purpose
Evaluate whether a PRD is clear, testable, and build-ready.
Evaluation Areas
- Problem clarity
- Scope definition
- Acceptance criteria
- Edge cases
- Metrics
- Ambiguity or missing detail
Output
Strengths
Gaps or Risks
Clarifying Questions
Rewrite Recommendations
Build Readiness
Ready / Needs Revision
References
See worked example for a complete scenario.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.