grill
Skill4 starsChanged 2 days agoMITView on GitHub
Stress-test a plan or idea with pointed questions asked one at a time, each with a recommended answer, until more answers would not change the work; then write a short spec and a ticket list with what blocks what. The short version: use for "poke holes in this plan and give me tickets", "quick stress-test before I build", or before a build whose request leaves real choices open. For a long, open-ended interview with no spec at the end ("grill me", "grill me relentlessly"), use `grilling`.
89 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- oberemokis/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- Yesterday-AI/ytstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- therealtinhtute/mono-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- gaoyu06/harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- afawfawffaf/my-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- BSSE23047/nauraiz-devtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use write-skill, root-cause and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
NoaiRoxSkillwrite-skill
Use when creating a new skill, editing an existing skill, or verifying a skill works before deployment.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Ingramradical235Skillroot-cause
Structured root cause analysis using WHERE (MECE decomposition) then WHY (causal structure diagrams) pipeline. Includes coin-flip detection, logical-leap detection, and vicious cycle intervention. Use when buffer enters YELLOW/RED, when metrics stall, or when Actions execute but don't produce results.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Neko-Catpital-LabsSkillprove-it
Shared evidence rule for investigating, diagnosing, debugging, proving, or explaining what happened or why for any problem or situation: do not assert something is fixed, working, passing, merged, or running unless you personally observed it this turn and can show what you saw; do not assert it was caused by X until a repro and controlled isolation prove that cause.
Also in 4 projects that use this
sahinSkillexecute
Also in 5 projects that use this
assisjpSkillfile-pr
Prepare and open or update an authorized pull request with a concise problem-first description and verifiable evidence. Use when the user asks to create, file, open, or update a PR. Do not use merely to review a diff or when publication is not authorized.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Arman-KudaibergenovSkillwrite-plan
Этот скилл MUST быть вызван когда есть design.md и нужно разбить доработку на атомарные задачи (2-5 мин) с точными путями файлов и критериями проверки в tasks.md. SHOULD также вызывать как промежуточный шаг между brainstorm и subagent-dev. Do NOT использовать для обсуждения идеи — используй brainstorm; для выполнения задач — используй subagent-dev.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions89 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 89
- kirodotdev/KiroCrew★ 4.8ksame name
- crbnos/carbon★ 2.8ksame name
- JuliusBrussee/cavekit★ 1.1ksame name
- SethGammon/Citadel★ 927same name
- nagi-studio/skills★ 470same name
- KerberosClaw/kc_ai_skills★ 79same name
- alamops/skills★ 53same name
- Kanevry/session-orchestrator★ 53same name
- oakreader/oakreader★ 46same name
- manusco/resonance★ 38same name
79 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository50 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-writingSkill
- arenaSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- bun-playwright-runner-selectionSkill
- cinematic-shotSkill
- clean-ui-shotSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- debug-loopSkill
- dep-upgradeSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- discoverSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- earshotSkill
- eval-judgeSkill
- flaky-testSkill
- grillingSkill
- idea-scoutSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- interrogateSkill
- make-mediaSkill
- migrate-to-rustSkill
- migration-planSkill
- multi-agent-windows-hazardsSkill
- perf-loopSkill
- postmortemSkill
- prototypeSkill
- prSkill
- real-soundSkill
- recallSkill
- release-notesSkill
- repo-mapSkill
- researchSkill
- retroSkill
- secure-diffSkill
- sellSkill
- subagent-report-recoverySkill
- tasteSkill
- taste-skillSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- weeklySkill
- windows-bash-backslash-halvingSkill
- wizardSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
- ycSkill
- ystack-upgradeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 70 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
Read the plan, the issue and the code it touches.
- Distinctive: line 34
Write, privately, every decision the plan depends on.
- Distinctive: line 39
Ask the highest-ranked open decision first.
- Distinctive: line 48
Wait for the answer. Then re-rank: an answer often settles or creates other decisions.
- Distinctive: line 56
Stop when every decision left would not change what gets built, or the user says stop.
- Distinctive: line 85
Every question carries a recommended answer, so "yes" is a valid reply.
- Distinctive: line 86
Ask about decisions, never about facts you could check.
- Distinctive: line 87
No spec until the questions stop changing the work.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 70 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Grill
A plan fails on the question nobody asked. This skill asks those questions, one at a time, and turns the answers into something an agent can build from.
When it applies
- A build or change where two sensible readings would lead to different work.
- A plan, design or idea the user wants challenged before committing to it.
- A vague issue or request that needs to become a spec and tickets.
Skip it when the request is already precise. Build instead.
Procedure
1. Read before you ask
Read the plan, the issue and the code it touches. Any fact you can look up (what the code does now, which library is in use, what a config holds) is yours to find, not the user's to answer. Use a subagent for the lookups if your host has them.
2. List the open decisions
Write, privately, every decision the plan depends on. Rank them by how much work changes with the answer. Drop any whose answers would all lead to the same work.
3. Ask one question at a time
Ask the highest-ranked open decision first. Each question:
Q3. <the decision, one sentence>
Why it matters: <what changes in the work, one line>
Options: A) ... B) ... C) ...
Recommended: B, because <one line>Wait for the answer. Then re-rank: an answer often settles or creates other decisions. Never ask something a previous answer already decided.
Push back once when an answer conflicts with an earlier one or with the code. Name the conflict and ask which wins.
4. Stop at the right point
Stop when every decision left would not change what gets built, or the user says stop. Usually that is 4-10 questions. Say "That's enough to build from" and move on.
5. Write the spec
Goal: <one sentence: who gets what>
Decisions: <each answer, one line each>
Out of scope: <what this will not do>
Done when: <checkable acceptance criteria, one per line>
Open: <anything still unknown, and the default you'll use>6. Write the tickets
Split the work into tickets an agent can finish in one session. Prefer thin slices that work end to end over one ticket per layer.
T1 <title> blocked by: none done when: <check>
T2 <title> blocked by: T1 done when: <check>
T3 <title> blocked by: none done when: <check>Say which tickets can start now in parallel. Write them to a file or the user's tracker only if asked.
Rules
- One question per message. A wall of questions gets skimmed.
- Every question carries a recommended answer, so "yes" is a valid reply.
- Ask about decisions, never about facts you could check.
- No spec until the questions stop changing the work.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

