research
Skill2 starsChanged 33 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user needs to investigate, explore, or spike on how something works and the findings should land as written `.context/research/` notes before any plan or implementation. Fires on "research how X works", "investigate X", "spike on X", "look into how X is done", "I need to understand X before planning". Not for: planning multi-step work once the approach is known (/aidex:plan); recording a decision/ADR (/aidex:decision); capturing a stakeholder request (/aidex:request); documenting a settled, stable reference (/aidex:reference); deferring/parking an idea (/aidex:backlog); ecosystem audits (/aidex:aidex); project-state audits (/aidex:audit).
189 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dialog-db/dialog-dbtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- howells/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- xiaoxiaosrm/dsh-mattpocock-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Suge8/friedbuntheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- wowyuarm/dsh-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Contexera/dsh-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use daily-arxiv, exp-eval and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
LambenthanSkilldaily-arxiv
每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新
Also in 5 projects that use this
LambenthanSkillexp-eval
实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges
Also in 5 projects that use this
truongtv22SkillProblem-Solving Techniques
Apply systematic problem-solving techniques for complexity spirals (simplification cascades), innovation blocks (collision-zone thinking), recurring patterns (meta-pattern recognition), assumption constraints (inversion exercise), scale uncertainty (scale game), and dispatch when stuck. Techniques derived from Microsoft Amplifier project patterns adapted for immediate application.
Also in 5 projects that use this
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 43 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-eval
Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-run
Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +5 more from Lambenthan
- +1 more from skyllwt
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 189
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- udecode/plate★ 17ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
179 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 169 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
Read the shared documentation canon: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/conventions/references/00-global.md (language, IDs, statuses, archive …
- Very specific: line 41
If a finding is mechanically verifiable (a benchmark or test the follow-up work should iterate against), link out to an loop loop-spec …
- Very specific: line 66
If the project carries a ratchet baseline (.context/.validate-baseline.json), a non-zero exit means you introduced a NEW violation — fix it …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 169 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Research
Capture an investigation or spike as written notes in
.context/research/<topic>/ before committing to a plan or
implementation. This skill is the single-purpose entry point for
research notes; the shared rules (language, IDs, statuses, archive) live in
the conventions canon, but research's own body shape is defined here.
Workflow
- Read the shared documentation canon:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/conventions/references/00-global.md(language, IDs, statuses, archive rules. Or the.claude/skills/...project-level copy if one exists). Research has its own body shape (below) — it does not borrow the reference runbook/MODULE template. - Pick the shape by size (ADR
decision/2026-07-02-research-artifact-shape): a single-document spike is one flat dated file (.context/research/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md— no folder); a multi-document topic is a dated folder (.context/research/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>/) with00-index.md(00-overview.mdis the accepted alias inresearch/only) plus sequentialNN-<slug>.mdfiles. When a spike gains a second document, promote it: create the dated folder and move the spike in as00-index.md. - Front-matter = the global minimum only:
title,status,created,updated. Noversion— a dated spike is a point-in-time investigation, not an evergreen doc that gets revised. Body = research's own minimal shape, three sections:
- Question / Scope — what you set out to answer and its bounds.
- Findings — free-form; number them, subsection them, whatever the investigation needs. No fixed Overview/Prerequisites/Verification skeleton.
- Answer / Recommendation — mandatory closing section that states what the spike concluded and what it recommends doing next. A spike is not done until this section answers the question.
If a finding is mechanically verifiable (a benchmark or test the follow-up work should iterate against), link out to an
looploop-spec rather than describing a manual loop here. Write the artifact in English (canon §Language).
Closing a spike
A spike closes when its question is answered — the Answer / Recommendation section is written. On close:
- Set
status: doneand stampupdated.doneis the terminal state; do not inventanswered,complete, orsuperseded-by-result— those are not in the base status vocabulary the validator enforces. - Link what it feeds:
escalated_toa plan or decision the research spawned, or setorigin_refon the artifact it produced back to this spike. - Research is versioned in place — there is no
_archive/step forresearch/(unlike decisions/requests, which archive on close per D-10).
Self-check
Validate the artifact you just wrote and fix any violation before closing:
python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/conventions/scripts/validate.py --type researchIf the project carries a ratchet baseline (.context/.validate-baseline.json),
a non-zero exit means you introduced a NEW violation — fix it before closing.
Boundaries
| The user wants to… | Route to |
| Plan multi-step / multi-phase implementation work | plan |
| Record a decision / ADR | decision |
| Capture a stakeholder/client request | request |
| Document a settled system reference | reference |
| Defer / park / shelve an idea for later | backlog |
| Audit the Claude Code ecosystem | aidex |
| Audit project state (UX/security/perf/a11y) | audit |
Related
- conventions — owns the shared documentation canon (
00-global.md: language, IDs, statuses, archive rules).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

