comm
Skill2 starsChanged 33 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user wants to log or draft a real communication with a person — capture an email/WhatsApp that was received, log a meeting or call that happened, or draft a message/email to send — as a written `.context/communications/` entry, kept in the communication''s native language. Fires on "log this email", "save the email the client sent", "capture this WhatsApp from X", "record the call with X", "log the meeting with X", "draft an email to X", "write a reply to the client", "save this thread", and /aidex:comm commands. Not for: capturing a stakeholder/product requirement to act on (/aidex:request); recording a decision/ADR (/aidex:decision); planning multi-step work (/aidex:plan); deferring an idea (/aidex:backlog); research notes (/aidex:research); references (/aidex:reference); ecosystem audits (/aidex:aidex); project-state audits (/aidex:audit).
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jircdev/crew-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- znut/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 25, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- znut/agent-skills★ 2same name
- jircdev/crew-plugin★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 56
Write the body afterward in the native language.
- Distinctive: line 137
If the meeting produced no action items, say so and stop — an empty derivation is a valid outcome and inventing work to fill the step is …
- Very specific: line 200
Every sent/ draft with channel: email (an email, a reply, "in HTML", "to paste into Outlook" — asked for or not) is built this way.
- Very specific: line 236
If the project carries a ratchet baseline (.context/.validate-baseline.json), a non-zero exit means you introduced a NEW violation — fix it …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Communications
Log real correspondence — emails, WhatsApp, calls, meetings — and draft outgoing
messages as consistent .context/communications/ entries. Each entry is a folder
holding a body.md (plus any attachments alongside it). The taxonomy splits on
async vs synchronous: async correspondence has a direction (received/, sent/);
synchronous conversations — meetings and calls — have participants, not a direction, and
live in meetings/. Communications are kept in their native language (D-04
English-default does NOT apply here; D-11 governs skill descriptions, not artifact bodies).
Sub-actions
| Command | Script | Purpose |
/aidex:comm new received <slug> [--channel email] | scripts/new-communication.sh | Scaffold a received async record (email/WhatsApp) under received/ |
/aidex:comm new sent <slug> [--channel whatsapp] | same | Scaffold an outgoing async draft under sent/ (status starts draft) |
/aidex:comm new meeting <slug> | same | Scaffold a synchronous meeting record under meetings/ (participant-based, status: sent) |
/aidex:comm new call <slug> | same | Scaffold a synchronous call record under meetings/ (participant-based, status: sent) |
/aidex:comm migrate | scripts/migrate-communications.sh | Rename pre-canonical email.md / conversation.md bodies to body.md, reporting each |
--channel is async-only and accepts email (default), whatsapp, other. For meetings
and calls use new meeting / new call — the channel is fixed to the kind.
Dispatch
bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/new-communication.sh" "$@"For migrate:
bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/migrate-communications.sh"It renames only files sitting directly inside a <YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/ entry folder, never
attachments, and refuses any rename that would clobber an existing body.md (exit 1). Run
validate.py --type communications first if you want the preview — the
communication-legacy-body-name findings are exactly what it will rename.
The script scaffolds .context/communications/<received|sent|meetings>/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/body.md
from the matching template, refuses to overwrite, and prints the created path on stdout.
For async, fill from/to/subject; for meetings/calls, fill participants/subject.
Write the body afterward in the native language.
Entry format
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/conventions/references/communication-conventions.md
before writing an entry — it is the full canon behind the shapes below: the
front-matter schema per direction, async (received/sent) vs synchronous
(meetings/), the draft→sent transition, the English-only exemption for bodies, and
how to migrate a legacy drafts/ folder.
.context/communications/
received/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/body.md (+ attachments alongside) async inbound
sent/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/body.md async outbound
meetings/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/body.md (+ transcript/slides) synchronous (meeting + call)Async (received/, sent/) front-matter — directional, from/to:
---
channel: email # email | whatsapp | other
direction: received # received | sent
from: "..."
to: "..."
subject: "..."
date: YYYY-MM-DD
status: sent # draft | sent (received records are 'sent'; outgoing start 'draft')
related: [] # D-03 cross-refs to other .context/ artifacts
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
---
<body — in the NATIVE language of the communication>Synchronous (meetings/) front-matter — non-directional, participants instead of
from/to, always status: sent (it already happened):
---
channel: meeting # meeting | call
participants: # the people in the conversation
- "Marta Ruiz <...> (Ejemplo SL)"
- "..."
organizer: "..." # optional
subject: "..."
date: YYYY-MM-DD
status: sent
related: []
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
---
<agenda / notes / decisions / action items — in the NATIVE language>After a meeting: action items become tracked work
Logging the meeting is half the job. A meeting record whose action items stay inside
body.md is a note, not a commitment. Once the body is written, walk its action items
and derive each one:
| The action item is… | Register it as | Command |
| Work this side has agreed to do | a backlog entry | bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/backlog/scripts/register-item.sh --origin communication --communication <folder> --title "<item>" |
| Something a stakeholder or client is asking for | a request | /aidex:request — capture the ask, then cross-ref the communication |
| A decision the meeting settled | an ADR | /aidex:decision |
--origin communication stamps origin_ref: communication/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug> — the D-03
marker, the folder name, never a filesystem path. That is what makes the entry answer
"where did this come from?" six months later.
Derive, do not transcribe. An action item is a line in someone's notes; a backlog entry needs a title that stands alone. "Ver lo del export" becomes "Add CSV export to the bookings list". Say what you registered when you are done, so nothing is created silently.
If the meeting produced no action items, say so and stop — an empty derivation is a valid outcome and inventing work to fill the step is worse than skipping it.
Drafting: read what was actually sent before opening the template
For the sent/ path, read the existing entries in .context/communications/sent/ of the
same channel before you draft — the folder is a corpus of messages this project really
sent, and it is the only record of how it sounds. Match structure (how it opens, how much
context it restates, how it closes) and register (formal vs direct, how requests are
phrased). Prefer the most recent few and any addressed to the same interlocutor.
The template is the fallback, not the starting point: use it when sent/ is empty or holds
nothing of the same kind. Say which prior entries you leaned on.
Never translate to match a sample. D-04 keeps every body in the communication's own language; a Spanish thread stays Spanish even when the closest structural example is English. Borrow the shape, never the language.
The house style is already in the scaffolded body
new-communication.sh reads .context/profiles/communication.md and renders its six axes —
voice, sign-off, tone, address, date format, paste font — into the body.md it creates, so
the draft starts in this workspace's voice instead of being corrected into it. A workspace
with no profile gets the documented defaults; that is the normal case, not an error. Read
the block at the top of the scaffolded file before writing, and if a correction keeps
recurring on an axis the profile does not carry, record it there rather than re-applying
it. Full shape:
conventions/references/communication-conventions.md § House style.
An outgoing email body must survive a paste into Outlook or Gmail
Neither client renders markdown, and the body is going to be pasted into one of them. Two
constructs have already reached real recipients broken — a table as a literal | grid, a
blockquote as literal > characters. So in a sent/ entry with channel: email:
| Do not write | Write instead |
| a markdown table | a bulleted list, or short Label — value lines |
a markdown blockquote (> …) | plain prose, or Ana escribió: followed by the text |
Bold, links and bullets paste correctly, so they stay available. validate.py enforces
this as communication-paste-unsafe — scoped to sent/ + channel: email only. A
received/ body is a faithful capture of what arrived: a table there is correct, and
>-quoted thread text is the normal inbound shape, so neither is flagged.
The HTML the owner pastes comes from the email-draft section below, which is the default
for every outgoing email draft; body.md stays the record. A hand-written body.html
alongside body.md is only for a body that path cannot express — attachments already
live next to the body, so this needs no new file tier.
A body.html states font-family explicitly, at the scaffolded paste_font value.
Omitting it is not neutral — copying from a browser puts computed styles on the clipboard,
so an unstyled block pastes as the browser's default serif instead of inheriting Outlook's
composing font. Do not emit an @font-face: Aptos lives inside Outlook.app, so a browser
preview falls back to Calibri, and that gap is documented rather than worked around. Full
contract: conventions/references/communication-conventions.md § Typography contract.
Every outgoing email draft: one spec, one command
Every sent/ draft with channel: email (an email, a reply, "in HTML", "to paste into
Outlook" — asked for or not) is built this way; never stop at a markdown body.md shown in
chat. Do not build an artifact page. Write ONE spec file per email (front matter subject, to,
cc, language; then the body in markdown: paragraphs, bold/italic, links, headings,
lists, pipe tables, one fenced block), then run (keep the spec inside the communication's own folder, sent/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/, beside body.md, since attachments and body.html live there per communication-conventions.md; a single newline in a paragraph is a line break, so sign-offs keep their lines):
python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/email-draft.py" <spec.md> [--out <dir>]It writes <spec>.html and <spec>.txt and prints both paths; open the HTML once. The page
shows Asunto / Para / CC on top, each with its own Copiar button, and the body below with one
Copiar correo button at its top-right corner. The page is a centered column (max-width) but the
body is inline-styled HTML only (no classes, scripts, stylesheets, width of any kind), so the
copied email takes the mail window's width and brings no page chrome. Tables are allowed here, unlike in a body.md paste. No .eml.
Draft → sent flow
An outgoing message is scaffolded under sent/ with status: draft. When it actually
goes out, set status: sent and bump updated. A received communication is a record of
what already arrived, so it lands with status: sent from the start. The draft→sent flow
is exclusive to outgoing async messages: meetings and calls already happened, so they land
with status: sent too.
Self-check
Validate the artifact you just wrote and fix any violation before closing:
python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/conventions/scripts/validate.py --type communicationsIf the project carries a ratchet baseline (.context/.validate-baseline.json),
a non-zero exit means you introduced a NEW violation — fix it before closing.
Related
- request — for a stakeholder/product requirement to act on (the ask), not the raw message; log the message here, capture the requirement there.
- conventions — parent convention for
.context/communications/.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

