context-infrastructure
Skill4 starsChanged 54 days agoMITView on GitHub
Design, audit, or improve durable context and memory systems for AI agents using layered observations, reflection, conservative promotion, progressive disclosure, and replayable boundary artifacts. Use when building long-running agent memory, deciding what belongs in sessions versus rules or skills, preventing context bloat, or turning repeated corrections and workflows into durable assets. Do not use it to copy another person's private axioms or automatically promote one-off observations.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agentic-repo-scaffoldSkill
- agent-travel-plannerSkill
- ai-workflow-spineSkill
- ana-awardSkill
- analyze-video-evidenceSkill
- apple-pdfSkill
- audit-fix-loopSkill
- autonomous-grindSkill
- award-flightsSkill
- banxian-skillSkill
- big-taskSkill
- clean-room-rewriteSkill
- cloudflare-r2-setupSkill
- codebase-sweepSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- download-web-videoSkill
- dr-sharpSkill
- game-script-creationSkill
- gemini-imageSkill
- gpt-imageSkill
- investigateSkill
- jewelry-marketingSkill
- learning-coachSkill
- mineru-pdf-parserSkill
- mtcSkill
- narrative-researchSkill
- neat-freakSkill
- pet-forgeSkill
- plan-design-reviewSkill
- pr-fix-loopSkill
- proxy-node-setupSkill
- serenity-bottleneck-researchSkill
- task-shaped-agent-routingSkill
- transcribeSkill
- tridentSkill
- tui-engineeringSkill
- wandian-writerSkill
- web-novel-writingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Treat context as a compounding system, not a giant prompt.
- Distinctive: line 27
Do not skip layers. Keep a new signal in L1 until reflection shows that it is repeated, stable, useful outside the original task, and …
- Distinctive: line 42
Keep automatic promotion off by default unless the domain has deterministic validation, rollback, and an explicitly authorized policy.
- Distinctive: line 63
Keep the global entrypoint as a routing table, not the whole memory system.
- Distinctive: line 64
Use indexes to tell agents when to load focused rules, skills, or knowledge.
- Distinctive: line 65
Put triggering information in skill metadata and detailed procedure in the skill body or directly linked references.
- Distinctive: line 69
Prefer sparse, high-density context over broad dumps and repeated summaries.
- Distinctive: line 71
Do not add another agent when a fixed-contract parser, index, or API call can route the context deterministically.
- Distinctive: line 91
Test the parts that future agents rely on:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Context Infrastructure
Treat context as a compounding system, not a giant prompt. Route, filter, test, and promote experience so future agents receive the smallest useful context.
This AX adaptation is inspired by the public
grapeot/context-infrastructure
reference implementation and the Observer/Reflector pattern described by
Mastra Observational Memory.
Reuse the architecture, not another person's accumulated axioms, preferences,
or private data.
Define four layers
| Layer | Purpose | Typical contents |
| L0 Session | Execute the current task | Prompt, active diff, command output, current plan |
| L1 Observations | Preserve selected raw signals | User corrections, repeated friction, notable failures, explicit preferences |
| L2 Reflection | Distill and discard | Deduplicated patterns, contradictions, counterexamples, promotion proposals |
| L3 Durable assets | Change future behavior | Axioms, reusable skills, global methodology, technical knowledge, project memory |
Do not skip layers. Keep a new signal in L1 until reflection shows that it is repeated, stable, useful outside the original task, and routed to the right scope.
Separate observation from promotion
Make the Observer append concise evidence. Make the Reflector merge, discard, or propose promotion.
- Record only explicit corrections, preferences, retractions, and recurring workflow lessons worth reconsidering. Most tasks should produce no memory.
- Preserve source, date, scope, and counterexamples needed to evaluate a signal.
- Merge duplicates and flag contradictions during reflection.
- Generate a reviewable promotion proposal before changing durable rules, axioms, skills, or shared memory.
- Keep automatic promotion off by default unless the domain has deterministic validation, rollback, and an explicitly authorized policy.
This split prevents one intense session from rewriting long-term behavior.
Route promotion by scope
| Repeated signal | Durable target |
| Stable personal preference | Personal axiom or preference profile |
| Repeated cross-project workflow | Reusable skill |
| Global operating methodology | Focused rule or policy |
| Reusable technical lesson | Knowledge entry |
| Project-specific decision or constraint | Project memory or source-of-truth documentation |
| One-off task fact | Keep ephemeral or discard |
Promote only claims that change future decisions. Preserve dissent and edge conditions; a rule without boundaries is usually too broad.
Design for progressive disclosure
- Keep the global entrypoint as a routing table, not the whole memory system.
- Use indexes to tell agents when to load focused rules, skills, or knowledge.
- Put triggering information in skill metadata and detailed procedure in the skill body or directly linked references.
- Retrieve project-specific context before global history when the task depends on current source truth.
- Prefer sparse, high-density context over broad dumps and repeated summaries.
Do not add another agent when a fixed-contract parser, index, or API call can route the context deterministically.
Make boundaries inspectable
For every context-producing workflow, define:
- Input boundary: source records, time window, permissions, and freshness.
- Selection boundary: inclusion, exclusion, deduplication, and privacy rules.
- Artifact boundary: an inspectable observation or reflection record before AI judgment becomes durable.
- Promotion boundary: owner, threshold, review, target, and rollback.
- Consumption boundary: which task shape loads which durable asset.
Store AI-facing inputs and AI-produced intermediate outputs when they affect visible or durable behavior. Debug bad output by inspecting freshness, timestamps, filters, ordering, and fallbacks before changing the model or prompt.
Protect integrity
Test the parts that future agents rely on:
- parser and schema shape;
- time-window and freshness filtering;
- deduplication and contradiction handling;
- fallback and retry signals;
- privacy, secret, and retention scans;
- deterministic replay from saved boundary artifacts;
- promotion thresholds and rollback behavior.
Minimize collection. Do not inspect private stores, upload records, or broaden retention without authorization. Redact secrets before an observation becomes a shared or durable artifact.
Completion contract
Return a compact system design or audit containing:
- the L0–L3 stores and owners;
- Observer and Reflector contracts;
- the signal-to-target promotion table and review threshold;
- progressive-disclosure routing;
- privacy, freshness, replay, and rollback checks;
- remaining manual decisions.
Complete only when a new observation can be traced from source to consumption without silent promotion or an uninspectable context jump.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

