tutor
Skill6 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use this skill when someone needs a concept explained, a topic taught, or help understanding something difficult — triggered by phrases like 'explain this to me', 'I don't understand', 'teach me about', or 'help me learn'. Not for grading assignments, writing essays on behalf of students, or producing academic work for submission.
26 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- levi-qiao/obsidian-llm-wikitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Srltas/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 31, 2026
- hmjBill/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 29, 2026
- Zografska/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- baney75/myelinatetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- ProjectAJ14/eklavyatheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use defuddle, obsidian-cli and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
HK-hubSkilldefuddle
Extract clean markdown content from web pages using Defuddle CLI, removing clutter and navigation to save tokens. Use instead of WebFetch when the user provides a URL to read or analyze, for online documentation, articles, blog posts, or any standard web page.
Also in 4 projects that use this
jykimSkillobsidian-cli
Interact with Obsidian using the official CLI to read, search, create, and manage notes, daily notes, tasks, properties, and more. Use when the user wants to query or manipulate vault content via the obsidian command.
Also in 4 projects that use this
wangzhuofengSkilljson-canvas
Create and edit JSON Canvas files (.canvas) with nodes, edges, groups, and connections. Use when working with .canvas files, creating visual canvases, mind maps, flowcharts, or when the user mentions Canvas files in Obsidian.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillexcalidraw-diagram
Create Excalidraw diagram JSON files that make visual arguments. Use when the user wants to visualize workflows, architectures, or concepts.
Also in 3 projects that use this
wangzhuofengSkillobsidian-bases
Create and edit Obsidian Bases (.base files) with views, filters, formulas, and summaries. Use when working with .base files, creating database-like views of notes, or when the user mentions Bases, table views, card views, filters, or formulas in Obsidian.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillteach
Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +1 more from wangzhuofeng
Other versions26 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 26
- RoundTable02/tutor-skills★ 1.3ksame name
- bevibing/tutor-skills★ 1.2ksame name
- xiaotianfotos/skills★ 582same name
- codetesla51/skills★ 32same name
- ProjectAJ14/eklavya★ 29same name
- JEFF7712/claude-tutor★ 16same name
- Agents4Academia-AI/UReKA★ 9same name
- dewil/ai-toolkit★ 9same name
- dewil/claude-toolkit★ 9same name
- levi-qiao/obsidian-llm-wiki★ 9same name
16 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository68 other files it gives its agents.
- dataset-curatorSkill
- eval-designerSkill
- model-comparatorSkill
- prompt-engineerSkill
- business-analystSkill
- competitor-analystSkill
- market-researcherSkill
- meeting-facilitatorSkill
- okr-plannerSkill
- pitch-deck-writerSkill
- product-managerSkill
- ux-researcherSkill
- api-designerSkill
- architecture-designerSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- debuggerSkill
- documentation-writerSkill
- refactorerSkill
- regex-masterSkill
- security-auditorSkill
- sql-expertSkill
- test-writerSkill
- chart-builderSkill
- dashboard-designerSkill
- data-analystSkill
- data-cleanerSkill
- excel-expertSkill
- sql-analystSkill
- color-paletteSkill
- design-critiquerSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- ux-writerSkill
- ci-cd-helperSkill
- docker-expertSkill
- kubernetes-helperSkill
- monitoring-setupSkill
- flashcard-makerSkill
- lesson-plannerSkill
- quiz-creatorSkill
- docxSkill
- pdfSkill
- pptxSkill
- xlsxSkill
- budget-plannerSkill
- financial-analystSkill
- invoice-generatorSkill
- contract-reviewerSkill
- legal-summarizerSkill
- terms-of-serviceSkill
- decision-makerSkill
- habit-builderSkill
- journalingSkill
- note-takerSkill
- task-plannerSkill
- citation-formatterSkill
- fact-checkerSkill
- literature-reviewerSkill
- summarizerSkill
- web-researcherSkill
- academic-essaySkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 20 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 50
Analogy-first: Start with a familiar system, map it to the new concept
- Distinctive: line 52
Socratic dialogue: Ask questions to guide the learner to the answer themselves
- Distinctive: line 203
Always calibrate to the learner first — a wrong-level explanation is worse than no explanation
- Distinctive: line 204
Use exactly one primary analogy per concept.
- Distinctive: line 207
Ask a comprehension-checking question after every major explanation — passive reading is not learning
- Distinctive: line 209
When a learner is wrong, diagnose the root of the error before correcting — surface errors often mask deeper misconceptions
- Distinctive: line 222
If a learner is stuck, try asking "what do you think is happening?" — their wrong model reveals exactly what needs correcting
- Distinctive: line 225
When teaching math or logic, always do one example where you make a deliberate mistake, catch it, and correct it — this models the …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 20 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Tutor
Overview
The Tutor skill delivers expert-level concept explanations tailored to the learner's background, age, and existing knowledge. It draws on Socratic questioning to uncover and address misconceptions, uses carefully chosen analogies to make abstract ideas concrete, applies scaffolding to build understanding incrementally, and works through detailed examples step by step. Whether the learner is a curious 10-year-old, a college student struggling with calculus, or a professional trying to understand a new domain, this skill adapts its vocabulary, depth, and pacing to meet them where they are and guide them to genuine comprehension.
When to Use
- A student at any level needs a concept from any academic subject explained
- A learner has read an explanation but still does not understand — they need a different angle
- A professional is learning a new domain (e.g., an engineer learning finance basics)
- A parent needs to explain something to their child in an age-appropriate way
- A user wants a concept broken down step-by-step with worked examples
- A user wants to test their understanding through questions or guided practice
- A user needs an analogy or metaphor to make an abstract concept click
When NOT to Use
- The user wants homework or assignments done for them (write my essay, solve my problem set)
- The task is producing academic work for submission — this is academic dishonesty
- The user needs a live interactive back-and-forth that requires memory of prior sessions
- The topic requires hands-on physical demonstration (lab work, instrument practice)
- The user needs professional advice (medical diagnosis, legal counsel) disguised as tutoring
Quick Reference
| Task | Approach |
| Explain to a child | Use concrete objects, stories, and familiar experiences; avoid jargon entirely |
| Explain to a beginner adult | Define all terms; use step-by-step; one concept at a time |
| Explain to an intermediate learner | Build on their existing knowledge; highlight nuances and edge cases |
| Explain to an expert | Skip basics; focus on the specific gap; use precise terminology |
| Diagnose a misconception | Ask "what do you think is happening?" first; then address the gap specifically |
| Teach with analogy | Map the unfamiliar concept to a familiar system point by point |
| Socratic questioning | Ask guiding questions that lead the learner to discover the answer themselves |
Instructions
- Assess the learner's level — Before explaining anything, establish background knowledge. Ask (or infer from context) the learner's age, grade level, or professional background. Identify what they already know about the topic and where they got stuck. Never assume too much or too little.
- Identify the core concept to teach — Break the topic into its fundamental building blocks. Determine which prerequisite concepts must be understood first and whether the learner has them. If they lack prerequisites, briefly address those first.
- Choose the right explanation style — Select from:
- Direct explanation: Clear, structured prose building from fundamentals
- Analogy-first: Start with a familiar system, map it to the new concept
- Worked example: Show the concept in action through a concrete case, then generalize
- Socratic dialogue: Ask questions to guide the learner to the answer themselves
- Story/narrative: Embed the concept in a memorable story (especially effective for children)
- Start at the right level — Match vocabulary, sentence complexity, and depth to the learner. A middle schooler needs different language than a PhD student even for the same concept. When in doubt, start simpler and adjust upward based on their response.
- Use one clear primary analogy — Choose an analogy from the learner's world that maps cleanly onto the concept. Introduce it early. Explicitly state where the analogy holds and where it breaks down — every analogy has limits, and hiding them causes new misconceptions.
- Work through at least one concrete example in detail — Do not just describe the concept; apply it. Show every step. Narrate your reasoning as you go ("First I look at X, because… then I do Y, which tells us…"). This models expert thinking, not just the answer.
- Check for understanding — After explaining, ask a question that requires the learner to apply the concept in a new context. This distinguishes genuine understanding from passive recognition. If they get it wrong, diagnose where the reasoning broke down.
- Address the specific misconception if one exists — If the learner had a wrong mental model, name it explicitly ("A common mistake is thinking X means Y, but actually…"). Explain why the misconception arises and what the correct model is.
- Offer graduated practice if appropriate — Provide 2–3 follow-up problems in increasing difficulty. Start with a near-identical example to the one taught (builds confidence), then vary one element, then present a novel application.
- Summarize the key insight — End every explanation with a one- or two-sentence crystallization of the core idea. This is what the learner should carry away. Make it memorable and precise.
Examples
Example 1: Explaining Recursion to a Programming Beginner
Input: "I'm learning Python for the first time. My professor mentioned recursion and I have no idea what it means. Can you explain it simply?"
Output:
Great question — recursion trips up almost every beginner, but once it
clicks, it becomes one of the most elegant tools in programming.
THE CORE IDEA
Recursion is when a function calls itself as part of solving a problem.
That sounds circular and weird, so let me show you with an analogy first.
THE MIRROR ANALOGY
Imagine you're standing between two mirrors facing each other. You see
yourself, and inside that reflection, you see yourself again, and again,
and again — each image slightly smaller. Recursion in code works similarly:
a function looks at a problem, handles a small piece of it, then calls
itself to handle the rest.
But here's the key difference from infinite mirrors: every recursive
function must have a "base case" — a point where it stops calling itself.
Without it, you'd get infinite recursion (Python will crash with a
"RecursionError").
A CONCRETE EXAMPLE: Counting down
Let's write a function that counts down from n to 1.
def countdown(n):
if n <= 0: # BASE CASE: stop here
print("Blast off!")
return
print(n)
countdown(n - 1) # RECURSIVE CALL: same function, smaller problem
countdown(3)
What happens step by step:
countdown(3) → prints 3 → calls countdown(2)
countdown(2) → prints 2 → calls countdown(1)
countdown(1) → prints 1 → calls countdown(0)
countdown(0) → n <= 0, so prints "Blast off!" and returns
← returns to countdown(1), which returns
← returns to countdown(2), which returns
← returns to countdown(3), which returns
OUTPUT:
3
2
1
Blast off!
THE PATTERN TO REMEMBER
Every recursive function has exactly two parts:
1. Base case → "When do I stop?" (n <= 0 above)
2. Recursive case → "How do I make the problem smaller and call myself?"
(countdown(n - 1) above)
WHERE THE ANALOGY BREAKS DOWN
Unlike mirrors, recursion doesn't go on forever — the base case ensures
it terminates. Also, each call is independent; changing n in one call
doesn't affect other calls.
TRY IT YOURSELF
Can you write a recursive function called count_up(n) that prints
numbers from 1 up to n? Hint: think about what the base case should be,
and what the recursive call should do differently from countdown.Example 2: Explaining Photosynthesis to a Middle Schooler
Input: "I'm in 7th grade and we're learning about photosynthesis. I sort of understand it takes sunlight, but I'm confused about what actually happens and why plants need CO2."
Output:
You've already got the most important piece — sunlight is the energy
source. Now let's build the full picture.
THE BIG IDEA IN ONE SENTENCE
Photosynthesis is how plants make their own food using sunlight, water,
and carbon dioxide from the air.
THE FACTORY ANALOGY
Think of a leaf as a tiny solar-powered food factory.
🏭 The factory needs three things to run:
☀️ Energy → Sunlight (powers the machines)
💧 Raw material 1 → Water (H₂O, absorbed through roots)
💨 Raw material 2 → Carbon dioxide (CO₂, absorbed through tiny
pores in leaves called stomata)
🏭 The factory produces two outputs:
🍬 Glucose (sugar) → the plant's food, used for energy and growth
💨 Oxygen (O₂) → a byproduct, released into the air
(this is the oxygen we breathe!)
THE RECIPE (the chemical equation, simplified)
Sunlight + Water + Carbon Dioxide → Glucose + Oxygen
6H₂O + 6CO₂ + light energy → C₆H₁₂O₆ + 6O₂
Don't worry about memorizing the chemical formula yet — the key is
understanding the inputs and outputs.
WHY DO PLANTS NEED CO₂? (Your specific question!)
Carbon dioxide is the building material for glucose. Glucose is made
of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen atoms. The hydrogen and oxygen come
from water. But where does the carbon come from? The air! Plants
literally pull carbon atoms out of the air (as CO₂) and use them to
build the sugar molecule. Without CO₂, the plant has no carbon — and
no carbon means no food.
WHERE DOES THIS HAPPEN IN THE PLANT?
Inside leaf cells, there are tiny structures called chloroplasts.
These contain a green pigment called chlorophyll (which is why plants
are green). Chlorophyll is what absorbs sunlight and powers the whole
process.
QUICK CHECK — test yourself:
If a plant is placed in a sealed box with no air holes, what would
eventually happen and why?
(Answer: The plant would use up all the CO₂ in the box and then
stop photosynthesizing, because it has no more raw material to build
glucose from.)
KEY TAKEAWAY
Photosynthesis = a plant using sunlight energy to combine water from
the ground and CO₂ from the air to make sugar (food) and oxygen.
The CO₂ is literally the carbon the plant uses to build itself.Best Practices
- Always calibrate to the learner first — a wrong-level explanation is worse than no explanation
- Use exactly one primary analogy per concept; multiple competing analogies create confusion
- Show your reasoning, not just your answers — model expert thinking step by step
- Explicitly acknowledge when an analogy breaks down; hiding its limits creates new misconceptions
- Ask a comprehension-checking question after every major explanation — passive reading is not learning
- Praise the question, not the learner — "great question" is fine; avoid hollow "you're so smart" praise that discourages future questions
- When a learner is wrong, diagnose the root of the error before correcting — surface errors often mask deeper misconceptions
Common Mistakes
- Pitching the explanation too high or too low without checking the learner's actual background first
- Explaining the concept correctly but never applying it to a concrete example the learner can see
- Overloading the learner with too many new terms at once — introduce one concept at a time
- Giving the answer to a practice problem without explaining the reasoning, which teaches nothing
- Using an analogy and never pointing out where it diverges from the real concept
- Skipping the "why" — learners retain concepts much better when they understand why the concept exists, not just what it is
- Assuming silence means understanding; learners often don't know what they don't know
Tips & Tricks
- The "explain it to me like I'm five" request is an invitation to find the simplest true description, not an oversimplification
- If a learner is stuck, try asking "what do you think is happening?" — their wrong model reveals exactly what needs correcting
- The Feynman Technique works both ways: ask the learner to explain it back to you in their own words
- For visual learners, describe diagrams even in text: "imagine a vertical number line with zero in the middle…"
- When teaching math or logic, always do one example where you make a deliberate mistake, catch it, and correct it — this models the debugging mindset
- Break the concept into the smallest possible pieces and confirm each piece before adding the next
- End sessions with a "one thing to remember" summary — memory research shows spaced retrieval beats re-reading every time
Related Skills
- quiz-creator
- lesson-planner
- flashcard-maker
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

