architecture-reviewer
Skill18 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Specialist skill for reviewing system architecture, database design, security concerns, scaling risks, maintainability, integration risk, and technical debt. Primary output: ARCHITECTURE_REVIEW.md.
9 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- JuanMarchetto/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- cobusgreyling/grok-build-arsenaltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Mathews-Tom/armorytheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- monsefchafik/claude-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- OneDro1d/dark-factorytheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- mrenigmatic19/claude_skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- Mathews-Tom/armory★ 340same name
- shep-ai/shep★ 277same name
- cobusgreyling/grok-build-arsenal★ 6same name
- JuanMarchetto/agent-skills★ 5same name
- OneDro1d/dark-factory★ 4same name
- domehahn/skil★ 1same name
- nileshteji/skills★ 1same name
- monsefchafik/claude-code-skills★ 0same name
- mrenigmatic19/claude_skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- build-systemSkill
- founder-osSkill
- growth-labSkill
- launch-roomSkill
- prd-studioSkill
- rapid-saas-builderSkill
- ux-criticSkill
- validation-labSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this skill to review technical design before or during implementation.
- Distinctive: line 58
Prefer a modular monolith for MVP unless evidence says otherwise.
- Distinctive: line 60
Treat security and data privacy as stage-appropriate requirements, not optional decoration.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Architecture Reviewer
Use this skill to review technical design before or during implementation. It is especially useful after PRD scope is defined and before the build becomes expensive to change.
The goal is appropriate architecture for the current stage, not maximum sophistication.
Primary Output
ARCHITECTURE_REVIEW.md
Use This Skill For
- System architecture review.
- Database schema review.
- Security and privacy concerns.
- Scaling risk.
- Maintainability.
- Integration risk.
- Technical debt assessment.
Do Not Use This Skill For
- Market validation.
- Writing PRDs.
- Implementing code directly.
- UX review.
- Growth planning.
Default Review Structure
# ARCHITECTURE_REVIEW.md
## Executive Summary
## Current Stage
## Proposed Architecture
## Fit For MVP Scope
## Database Review
## API / Integration Review
## Mobile Store Payment Review
## Security And Privacy Review
## Scaling Risks
## Maintainability Risks
## Technical Debt
## What To Build Now
## What To Defer
## RecommendationsPrinciples
- Match architecture to validated stage.
- Prefer a modular monolith for MVP unless evidence says otherwise.
- Defer scaling work until bottlenecks are real.
- Treat security and data privacy as stage-appropriate requirements, not optional decoration.
- Flag AI, data, and integration risks early.
- For mobile apps, review App Store and Google Play payment compliance before approving the architecture. In-app digital goods, premium features, credits, and subscriptions should use Apple IAP / Google Play Billing, often through RevenueCat, unless a documented exception applies.
References
references/architecture-review-framework.mdfor general review.references/database-review.mdfor schema and data modeling.references/security-review.mdfor security/privacy.references/scaling-review.mdfor scaling and reliability.references/mobile-payment-review.mdfor App Store, Google Play, and RevenueCat payment architecture checks.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

