roadmap
Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Discuss roadmap, phases, and progress for the current project. Read/update GitHub Projects, migrate internal plans, review phase status. Triggers: "roadmap", "phases", "avancement", "progress", "migrate plans".
48 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- gopalparashar421/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dirien/yet-another-agent-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Ovich/charrettetheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- ryanmoelter/plumetheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- eyssette/js-templatetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- danielcherubini/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use sequence, stakeholder-update and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GTMifySkillsequence
Build a multi-channel outreach cadence (email + LinkedIn + phone) for a target persona or named prospect. Use when the user says 'build a sequence', 'outreach cadence', 'multi-touch sequence', 'multi-channel cadence', 'follow-up sequence', or needs a coordinated multi-channel play. Do NOT use for single cold emails — use cold-email instead.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillstakeholder-update
Generate a stakeholder update tailored to audience and cadence. Use when writing a weekly or monthly status for leadership, announcing a launch, escalating a risk or blocker, or translating the same progress into exec-brief, engineering-detail, or customer-facing versions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
EpistatesSkillstrategy
Plan weekly or monthly X content strategy. Use when the user wants to plan their content calendar, set growth goals, build a content pipeline, or think strategically about their X presence.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ArvorCoSkillspecify
Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GitHubSkillprd
Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.
Also in 7 projects that use this
michalattSkillchallenge
Pressure-test plans, decisions, and directions by picking and answering the most relevant challenge questions for the current conversation
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions48 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 48
- cloudposse/atmos★ 1.4ksame name
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- andreaskelm/pm-brain★ 235same name
- genkovich/sdd★ 187same name
- YougLin-dev/Aha-Loop★ 181same name
- Ovid/paad★ 150same name
- facebookresearch/autoform-bot★ 136same name
- Mehdibargach/claude-code-pm-skills★ 97same name
- joshuadavidthomas/agent-skills★ 49same name
- spmtitsolution/OpenBA-Kit★ 38same name
38 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ci-watchSkill
- commitSkill
- discovery-interview-prepSkill
- doc-generateSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- opportunity-solution-treeSkill
- polarisSkill
- prd-developmentSkill
- prioritization-advisorSkill
- reviewSkill
- security-auditSkill
- session-wrapSkill
- spec-updateSkill
- tddSkill
- tech-debt-auditSkill
- test-runnerSkill
- user-storySkill
- uxSkill
- workshop-facilitationSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 41 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 32
If no project exists for the current repo, create one automatically from the Project Template (see /setup Step 1c for the full procedure: …
- Very specific: line 45
Use workshop-facilitation as the default interaction protocol for this skill.
- Very specific: line 64
Read the project number from CLAUDE.md or discover via gh project list --owner wilsto
- Distinctive: line 89
Ask: "Want to drill into a specific phase or issue?"
- Distinctive: line 93
Run Status (above) first to establish context
- Distinctive: line 94
Ask: "What would you like to discuss?"
- Very specific: line 106
If approved, update Phase field on remaining open items via gh project item-edit
- Distinctive: line 110
Ask: title, description, phase, priority, size, type
- Distinctive: line 115
If any field is missing, warn and ask PO to complete before creating
- Very specific: line 120
Read field/option IDs from CLAUDE.local.md (cached) or gh project field-list <N> --owner wilsto
- Very specific: line 122
If epic with sub-tasks, create parent issue then sub-issues via mcp__github__sub_issue_write (repeat steps 3a-3c for each sub-issue)
- Distinctive: line 166
Do NOT delete the plan files (keep as historical reference)
- Very specific: line 252
Fix: Always fetch fresh data via gh project item-list.
- Distinctive: line 256
Fix: Before creating, search for existing issues with matching titles.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 41 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Purpose
Provide a single entry point for all roadmap-related interactions on the current project: check progress, discuss phases, reprioritize, or migrate legacy Claude plans into GitHub Issues. Everything reads from and writes to the project's GitHub Project V2 (source of truth).
This is not a planning workshop -- it's an operational tool for PO/Dev sync on where things stand and what's next.
Key Concepts
Source of Truth
- Roadmap, phases, and tasks live in GitHub Projects V2
- Claude's internal plans (
~/.claude/plans/) are ephemeral implementation details - TodoWrite tracks in-session subtask execution only -- the backlog lives in GitHub
- Phase transitions are Level 3 decisions (propose & wait for PO approval)
Project Discovery
The skill reads the project number from CLAUDE.md (section "Project Tracking") or discovers it via:
gh project list --owner wilsto --format jsonIf no project exists for the current repo, create one automatically from the Project Template (see /setup Step 1c for the full procedure: copyProjectV2 GraphQL mutation + field ID caching in CLAUDE.local.md).
Phase Model
Projects use a custom field "Phase" with values:
🔬 Discovery-- exploring problem space, user research🏗️ MVP-- building minimum viable product🚀 Beta-- testing with real users, stabilizing✅ Stable-- production-ready, maintenance mode🧹 Maintenance-- bug fixes, dependency updates, minor improvements
Facilitation Source of Truth
Use workshop-facilitation as the default interaction protocol for this skill.
It defines: session heads-up + entry mode, one-question turns, progress labels, interruption handling, numbered recommendations at decision points, quick-select options.
This file defines the domain-specific logic. If there is a conflict, follow this file's domain logic.
Application
Step 0: Mode Selection
On invocation, present 3 modes:
"What do you want to do with the roadmap?"
- Status -- See where things stand (phases, progress, blockers)
- Discuss -- Talk about priorities, phase transitions, or new work
- Migrate -- Import legacy Claude plans into GitHub Issues
Mode 1: Status
- Read the project number from CLAUDE.md or discover via
gh project list --owner wilsto - Fetch all items:
gh project item-list <N> --owner wilsto --format json - Fetch field definitions:
gh project field-list <N> --owner wilsto - Synthesize and display:
## 📊 Project Status -- <project-name>
### By Phase
| Phase | Open | In Progress | Done | Total |
|-------|------|-------------|------|-------|
| 🏗️ MVP | 5 | 2 | 8 | 15 |
| 🚀 Beta | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
### Current Focus (In Progress)
- #42 — Implement Stripe checkout [🔴 Critical, M]
- #45 — Fix auth redirect bug [🟠 High, S]
### Blockers
- #43 — Waiting on PO decision: pricing model
### Summary
15/19 items tracked. 42% complete. Active phase: 🏗️ MVP.- Ask: "Want to drill into a specific phase or issue?"
Mode 2: Discuss
- Run Status (above) first to establish context
- Ask: "What would you like to discuss?"
- Phase transition -- propose moving to next phase (Level 3)
- Reprioritize -- change priority on specific issues
- Add work -- create new issues or epics
- Review phase -- retrospective on current phase
Phase Transition Flow
- Show completion stats for current phase
- List any open items that would block transition
- Propose: "Ready to move from 🏗️ MVP to 🚀 Beta?"
- Wait for PO approval (Level 3 decision)
- If approved, update Phase field on remaining open items via
gh project item-edit
Add Work Flow
- Ask: title, description, phase, priority, size, type
- DoR check — Before creating, verify the issue meets Definition of Ready (see
workflow.md):- Title is clear and actionable
- Description includes acceptance criteria
- Phase, Priority, Size are set
- If any field is missing, warn and ask PO to complete before creating
- Create the issue (3-step mandatory process — see
workflow.md→ Issue Creation Procedure): a.gh issue create --repo wilsto/<REPO> --title "..." --body "..."b.gh project item-add <PROJECT_NUMBER> --owner wilsto --url <ISSUE_URL>— without this, the issue is invisible on the board c. Set ALL project fields via GraphQL: Status, Phase, Priority, Size, Type, Start date (auto: today if status ≠ Todo, empty otherwise — seeworkflow.mdDate rules)- Read field/option IDs from
CLAUDE.local.md(cached) orgh project field-list <N> --owner wilsto - An issue is NOT "created" until all 3 sub-steps are complete
- Read field/option IDs from
- If epic with sub-tasks, create parent issue then sub-issues via
mcp__github__sub_issue_write(repeat steps 3a-3c for each sub-issue) - Confirm creation with issue numbers and verify they appear on the project board
Mode 3: Migrate
- Identify the current repo name from git remote or cwd
- Scan
~/.claude/plans/*.mdfor plans related to this project:- grep for repo name (e.g.,
coachbywill-v2,bookmark-veille) - grep for file paths matching the project directory
- grep for repo name (e.g.,
- List matching plans with summary:
Found 2 plans related to this project:
1. ancient-floating-prism.md — "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" (10 slices)
2. scalable-sauteeing-clock.md — "Admin Toggle Tier + Seed Accounts"
Which plans do you want to migrate? (1, 2, both, none)- For each selected plan: a. Read the full plan file b. Extract structured slices/phases/tasks c. Preview: Display a detailed table of all issues to be created:
Preview — "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" (10 issues to create):
| # | Type | Title | Phase | Priority | Size |
|---|------|-------|-------|----------|------|
| Epic | Epic | "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" | 🏗️ MVP | — | — |
| 1 | Sub | "Implement Stripe checkout" | 🏗️ MVP | 🔴 Critical | M |
| 2 | Sub | "Add MBTI test flow" | 🏗️ MVP | 🟠 High | L |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |d. Ask PO: "Create these N issues? (Yes / Edit / Cancel)"
e. If "Edit", let PO modify titles, phases, priorities, or sizes before creation
f. If approved, for each issue follow the 3-step creation process (see workflow.md):
- gh issue create → gh project item-add → set all fields via GraphQL
g. Create epic issue first, then sub-issues for each slice/task
h. Set Phase, Priority, Size, Type fields. Start date = earliest commit or release date for Done items, today for In Progress, empty for Todo.
i. Link sub-issues to the epic via mcp__github__sub_issue_write
5. Show summary of created issues with links and verify all appear on the project board
6. Do NOT delete the plan files (keep as historical reference)
Examples
Example: Status Check
User: /roadmap
Claude: What do you want to do with the roadmap?
1. Status 2. Discuss 3. Migrate
User: 1
Claude:
## 📊 Project Status — coachbywill-v2
### By Phase
| Phase | Open | In Progress | Done |
|-------|------|-------------|------|
| 🏗️ MVP | 3 | 1 | 12 |
### Current Focus (In Progress)
- #42 — Implement Stripe checkout [🔴 Critical, M]
### Summary
16 items tracked. 75% complete. Active phase: 🏗️ MVP.
Want to drill into a specific phase or issue?Example: Phase Transition
User: /roadmap → Discuss → Phase transition
Claude: Current phase: 🏗️ MVP (75% complete)
Open items blocking transition:
- #42 — Stripe checkout (In Progress)
- #50 — MBTI test flow (Todo)
- #51 — Freemium gating (Todo)
⚠️ 3 items still open. Proposal: close or defer these before moving to 🚀 Beta.
What do you want to do?
1. Defer open items and transition anyway
2. Keep working on MVP until these are done
3. Let me review each itemExample: Plan Migration
User: /roadmap → Migrate
Claude: Found 2 plans related to coachbywill-v2:
1. ancient-floating-prism.md — "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" (10 slices)
2. scalable-sauteeing-clock.md — "Admin Toggle Tier" (2 tasks)
Which to migrate? (1, 2, both, none)
User: 1
Claude:
Preview — "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" (11 issues to create):
| # | Type | Title | Phase | Priority | Size |
|---|------|-------|-------|----------|------|
| Epic | Epic | "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" | 🏗️ MVP | — | — |
| 1 | Sub | "Implement Stripe checkout" | 🏗️ MVP | 🔴 Critical | M |
| 2 | Sub | "Add pricing page" | 🏗️ MVP | 🟠 High | S |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10 | Sub | "E2E payment tests" | 🏗️ MVP | 🟡 Medium | M |
Create these 11 issues? (Yes / Edit / Cancel)
User: Yes
Claude: Migrating...
✅ Created epic #60 "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" with 10 sub-issues (#61-#70)
All items set to Phase: 🏗️ MVP, Status: Todo.Common Pitfalls
Pitfall 1: No Project Number
Symptom: CLAUDE.md doesn't have a Project Tracking section yet.
Fix: Fall back to gh project list --owner wilsto and match by repo name. Suggest adding the section to CLAUDE.md.
Pitfall 2: Stale Status
Symptom: GitHub Project has items but Claude shows old data.
Fix: Always fetch fresh data via gh project item-list. Never cache across sessions.
Pitfall 3: Migrating Already-Migrated Plans
Symptom: Running Migrate twice creates duplicate issues. Fix: Before creating, search for existing issues with matching titles. Warn if duplicates found.
Pitfall 4: Phase Transition Without PO
Symptom: Claude transitions phase autonomously. Fix: Phase transitions are Level 3 -- always propose and wait. Never auto-transition.
References
Related Skills
workshop-facilitation-- interaction protocolpolaris-- strategic context (goals, values)commit-- quality-gated commit workflow
Tools Used
gh project list/item-list/field-list/item-edit-- GitHub CLI project commandsgh issue create/list-- issue managementmcp__github__issue_write-- MCP issue creationmcp__github__sub_issue_write-- MCP sub-issue linking
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

