agentleFS
wilstowilsto/claude-code-starter-kit/.claude/skills/roadmap/SKILL.md

roadmap

Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Discuss roadmap, phases, and progress for the current project. Read/update GitHub Projects, migrate internal plans, review phase status. Triggers: "roadmap", "phases", "avancement", "progress", "migrate plans".

48 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use sequence, stakeholder-update and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • GTMifySkill

    sequence

    Build a multi-channel outreach cadence (email + LinkedIn + phone) for a target persona or named prospect. Use when the user says 'build a sequence', 'outreach cadence', 'multi-touch sequence', 'multi-channel cadence', 'follow-up sequence', or needs a coordinated multi-channel play. Do NOT use for single cold emails — use cold-email instead.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    stakeholder-update

    Generate a stakeholder update tailored to audience and cadence. Use when writing a weekly or monthly status for leadership, announcing a launch, escalating a risk or blocker, or translating the same progress into exec-brief, engineering-detail, or customer-facing versions.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • EpistatesSkill

    strategy

    Plan weekly or monthly X content strategy. Use when the user wants to plan their content calendar, set growth goals, build a content pipeline, or think strategically about their X presence.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ArvorCoSkill

    specify

    Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GitHubSkill

    prd

    Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • michalattSkill

    challenge

    Pressure-test plans, decisions, and directions by picking and answering the most relevant challenge questions for the current conversation

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 41 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If no project exists for the current repo, create one automatically from the Project Template (see /setup Step 1c for the full procedure: …

    line 32
  2. Very specific:

    Use workshop-facilitation as the default interaction protocol for this skill.

    line 45
  3. Very specific:

    Read the project number from CLAUDE.md or discover via gh project list --owner wilsto

    line 64
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask: "Want to drill into a specific phase or issue?"

    line 89
  5. Distinctive:

    Run Status (above) first to establish context

    line 93
  6. Distinctive:

    Ask: "What would you like to discuss?"

    line 94
  7. Very specific:

    If approved, update Phase field on remaining open items via gh project item-edit

    line 106
  8. Distinctive:

    Ask: title, description, phase, priority, size, type

    line 110
  9. Distinctive:

    If any field is missing, warn and ask PO to complete before creating

    line 115
  10. Very specific:

    Read field/option IDs from CLAUDE.local.md (cached) or gh project field-list <N> --owner wilsto

    line 120
  11. Very specific:

    If epic with sub-tasks, create parent issue then sub-issues via mcp__github__sub_issue_write (repeat steps 3a-3c for each sub-issue)

    line 122
  12. Distinctive:

    Do NOT delete the plan files (keep as historical reference)

    line 166
  13. Very specific:

    Fix: Always fetch fresh data via gh project item-list.

    line 252
  14. Distinctive:

    Fix: Before creating, search for existing issues with matching titles.

    line 256

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 41 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Purpose

Provide a single entry point for all roadmap-related interactions on the current project: check progress, discuss phases, reprioritize, or migrate legacy Claude plans into GitHub Issues. Everything reads from and writes to the project's GitHub Project V2 (source of truth).

This is not a planning workshop -- it's an operational tool for PO/Dev sync on where things stand and what's next.

Key Concepts

Source of Truth

  • Roadmap, phases, and tasks live in GitHub Projects V2
  • Claude's internal plans (~/.claude/plans/) are ephemeral implementation details
  • TodoWrite tracks in-session subtask execution only -- the backlog lives in GitHub
  • Phase transitions are Level 3 decisions (propose & wait for PO approval)

Project Discovery

The skill reads the project number from CLAUDE.md (section "Project Tracking") or discovers it via:

gh project list --owner wilsto --format json

If no project exists for the current repo, create one automatically from the Project Template (see /setup Step 1c for the full procedure: copyProjectV2 GraphQL mutation + field ID caching in CLAUDE.local.md).

Phase Model

Projects use a custom field "Phase" with values:

  • 🔬 Discovery -- exploring problem space, user research
  • 🏗️ MVP -- building minimum viable product
  • 🚀 Beta -- testing with real users, stabilizing
  • ✅ Stable -- production-ready, maintenance mode
  • 🧹 Maintenance -- bug fixes, dependency updates, minor improvements

Facilitation Source of Truth

Use workshop-facilitation as the default interaction protocol for this skill.

It defines: session heads-up + entry mode, one-question turns, progress labels, interruption handling, numbered recommendations at decision points, quick-select options.

This file defines the domain-specific logic. If there is a conflict, follow this file's domain logic.

Application

Step 0: Mode Selection

On invocation, present 3 modes:

"What do you want to do with the roadmap?"

  1. Status -- See where things stand (phases, progress, blockers)
  2. Discuss -- Talk about priorities, phase transitions, or new work
  3. Migrate -- Import legacy Claude plans into GitHub Issues

Mode 1: Status

  1. Read the project number from CLAUDE.md or discover via gh project list --owner wilsto
  2. Fetch all items: gh project item-list <N> --owner wilsto --format json
  3. Fetch field definitions: gh project field-list <N> --owner wilsto
  4. Synthesize and display:
## 📊 Project Status -- <project-name>

### By Phase
| Phase | Open | In Progress | Done | Total |
|-------|------|-------------|------|-------|
| 🏗️ MVP | 5 | 2 | 8 | 15 |
| 🚀 Beta | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |

### Current Focus (In Progress)
- #42 — Implement Stripe checkout [🔴 Critical, M]
- #45 — Fix auth redirect bug [🟠 High, S]

### Blockers
- #43 — Waiting on PO decision: pricing model

### Summary
15/19 items tracked. 42% complete. Active phase: 🏗️ MVP.
  1. Ask: "Want to drill into a specific phase or issue?"

Mode 2: Discuss

  1. Run Status (above) first to establish context
  2. Ask: "What would you like to discuss?"
    1. Phase transition -- propose moving to next phase (Level 3)
    2. Reprioritize -- change priority on specific issues
    3. Add work -- create new issues or epics
    4. Review phase -- retrospective on current phase

Phase Transition Flow

  1. Show completion stats for current phase
  2. List any open items that would block transition
  3. Propose: "Ready to move from 🏗️ MVP to 🚀 Beta?"
  4. Wait for PO approval (Level 3 decision)
  5. If approved, update Phase field on remaining open items via gh project item-edit

Add Work Flow

  1. Ask: title, description, phase, priority, size, type
  2. DoR check — Before creating, verify the issue meets Definition of Ready (see workflow.md):
    • Title is clear and actionable
    • Description includes acceptance criteria
    • Phase, Priority, Size are set
    • If any field is missing, warn and ask PO to complete before creating
  3. Create the issue (3-step mandatory process — see workflow.md → Issue Creation Procedure): a. gh issue create --repo wilsto/<REPO> --title "..." --body "..." b. gh project item-add <PROJECT_NUMBER> --owner wilsto --url <ISSUE_URL> — without this, the issue is invisible on the board c. Set ALL project fields via GraphQL: Status, Phase, Priority, Size, Type, Start date (auto: today if status ≠ Todo, empty otherwise — see workflow.md Date rules)
    • Read field/option IDs from CLAUDE.local.md (cached) or gh project field-list <N> --owner wilsto
    • An issue is NOT "created" until all 3 sub-steps are complete
  4. If epic with sub-tasks, create parent issue then sub-issues via mcp__github__sub_issue_write (repeat steps 3a-3c for each sub-issue)
  5. Confirm creation with issue numbers and verify they appear on the project board

Mode 3: Migrate

  1. Identify the current repo name from git remote or cwd
  2. Scan ~/.claude/plans/*.md for plans related to this project:
    • grep for repo name (e.g., coachbywill-v2, bookmark-veille)
    • grep for file paths matching the project directory
  3. List matching plans with summary:
Found 2 plans related to this project:

1. ancient-floating-prism.md — "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" (10 slices)
2. scalable-sauteeing-clock.md — "Admin Toggle Tier + Seed Accounts"

Which plans do you want to migrate? (1, 2, both, none)
  1. For each selected plan: a. Read the full plan file b. Extract structured slices/phases/tasks c. Preview: Display a detailed table of all issues to be created:
Preview — "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" (10 issues to create):

| # | Type | Title | Phase | Priority | Size |
|---|------|-------|-------|----------|------|
| Epic | Epic | "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" | 🏗️ MVP | — | — |
| 1 | Sub | "Implement Stripe checkout" | 🏗️ MVP | 🔴 Critical | M |
| 2 | Sub | "Add MBTI test flow" | 🏗️ MVP | 🟠 High | L |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

d. Ask PO: "Create these N issues? (Yes / Edit / Cancel)" e. If "Edit", let PO modify titles, phases, priorities, or sizes before creation f. If approved, for each issue follow the 3-step creation process (see workflow.md): - gh issue create → gh project item-add → set all fields via GraphQL g. Create epic issue first, then sub-issues for each slice/task h. Set Phase, Priority, Size, Type fields. Start date = earliest commit or release date for Done items, today for In Progress, empty for Todo. i. Link sub-issues to the epic via mcp__github__sub_issue_write 5. Show summary of created issues with links and verify all appear on the project board 6. Do NOT delete the plan files (keep as historical reference)

Examples

Example: Status Check

User: /roadmap
Claude: What do you want to do with the roadmap?
  1. Status  2. Discuss  3. Migrate
User: 1

Claude:
## 📊 Project Status — coachbywill-v2

### By Phase
| Phase | Open | In Progress | Done |
|-------|------|-------------|------|
| 🏗️ MVP | 3 | 1 | 12 |

### Current Focus (In Progress)
- #42 — Implement Stripe checkout [🔴 Critical, M]

### Summary
16 items tracked. 75% complete. Active phase: 🏗️ MVP.

Want to drill into a specific phase or issue?

Example: Phase Transition

User: /roadmap → Discuss → Phase transition
Claude: Current phase: 🏗️ MVP (75% complete)

Open items blocking transition:
- #42 — Stripe checkout (In Progress)
- #50 — MBTI test flow (Todo)
- #51 — Freemium gating (Todo)

⚠️ 3 items still open. Proposal: close or defer these before moving to 🚀 Beta.
What do you want to do?
  1. Defer open items and transition anyway
  2. Keep working on MVP until these are done
  3. Let me review each item

Example: Plan Migration

User: /roadmap → Migrate
Claude: Found 2 plans related to coachbywill-v2:

1. ancient-floating-prism.md — "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" (10 slices)
2. scalable-sauteeing-clock.md — "Admin Toggle Tier" (2 tasks)

Which to migrate? (1, 2, both, none)
User: 1

Claude:
Preview — "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" (11 issues to create):

| # | Type | Title | Phase | Priority | Size |
|---|------|-------|-------|----------|------|
| Epic | Epic | "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" | 🏗️ MVP | — | — |
| 1 | Sub | "Implement Stripe checkout" | 🏗️ MVP | 🔴 Critical | M |
| 2 | Sub | "Add pricing page" | 🏗️ MVP | 🟠 High | S |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| 10 | Sub | "E2E payment tests" | 🏗️ MVP | 🟡 Medium | M |

Create these 11 issues? (Yes / Edit / Cancel)
User: Yes

Claude: Migrating...
✅ Created epic #60 "Phase 2 — Stripe + MBTI" with 10 sub-issues (#61-#70)
All items set to Phase: 🏗️ MVP, Status: Todo.

Common Pitfalls

Pitfall 1: No Project Number

Symptom: CLAUDE.md doesn't have a Project Tracking section yet. Fix: Fall back to gh project list --owner wilsto and match by repo name. Suggest adding the section to CLAUDE.md.

Pitfall 2: Stale Status

Symptom: GitHub Project has items but Claude shows old data. Fix: Always fetch fresh data via gh project item-list. Never cache across sessions.

Pitfall 3: Migrating Already-Migrated Plans

Symptom: Running Migrate twice creates duplicate issues. Fix: Before creating, search for existing issues with matching titles. Warn if duplicates found.

Pitfall 4: Phase Transition Without PO

Symptom: Claude transitions phase autonomously. Fix: Phase transitions are Level 3 -- always propose and wait. Never auto-transition.

References

Related Skills

  • workshop-facilitation -- interaction protocol
  • polaris -- strategic context (goals, values)
  • commit -- quality-gated commit workflow

Tools Used

  • gh project list/item-list/field-list/item-edit -- GitHub CLI project commands
  • gh issue create/list -- issue management
  • mcp__github__issue_write -- MCP issue creation
  • mcp__github__sub_issue_write -- MCP sub-issue linking

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.