obsidian-capture
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Distill an insight or story from the current conversation into a note in the user's Obsidian vault - use when the user says "save this", "capture this", or "add this to my notes", or when another skill needs to record into the vault.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ddenzu/karpathy-llm-wiki-second-braintheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- aiqianqian521/obsidian-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- wilbeibi/wilbeibi-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 7, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- ddenzu/karpathy-llm-wiki-second-brain★ 6same name
- wilbeibi/wilbeibi-skills★ 2same name
- aiqianqian521/obsidian-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- add-eval-caseSkill
- defend-your-workSkill
- note-graduationSkill
- research-industry-patternsSkill
- user-impactSkill
- writing-adrsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Ask the user once, and suggest recording the answer in their global CLAUDE.md so this question never repeats.
- Distinctive: line 19
If the standard PARA folders are not present, list the vault root and map to the structure that is actually there.
- Distinctive: line 25
If the user named a target note or section, that is the target.
- Very specific: line 28
Search the vault (find/grep by keyword) for an existing note that should hold it.
- Distinctive: line 29
Prefer folding into an existing note over creating a new one - a vault of many tiny orphan notes is worse than fewer living ones.
- Very specific: line 30
If nothing fits, create a new note in the folder that matches: active work with an end date -> Projects/, ongoing responsibilities -> …
- Distinctive: line 31
If two existing notes both plausibly fit, ask the user rather than guessing.
- Distinctive: line 35
Never restructure a note while capturing into it.
- Distinctive: line 54
Keep the user's voice: first person ("I asked", "I checked") when the story is about the user's actions - these notes are often rehearsal …
- Distinctive: line 58
Not a journal: no timestamps-of-conversation, no "Claude said / I said" framing unless the human-AI exchange is itself the point of the …
- Distinctive: line 59
Not a dump: if the capture exceeds ~25 lines, it is probably a transcript wearing a trench coat - distill harder.
- Distinctive: line 60
Not a restructuring tool: it never renames, moves, or reorganizes existing notes.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Obsidian capture
Turn something that just happened or was learned in this conversation into a durable note in the user's Obsidian vault.
Step 0: Resolve the vault path
In order, use the first that resolves:
- The
OBSIDIAN_VAULTenvironment variable. - A vault path recorded in the user's global CLAUDE.md or memory.
- Ask the user once, and suggest recording the answer in their global CLAUDE.md so this question never repeats.
This skill assumes a PARA-organized vault. If the standard PARA folders are not present, list the vault root and map to the structure that is actually there.
Process
- Identify the capture. From the user's request and the conversation, pin down the specific example, exchange, decision, or insight to save - not a transcript, the distilled version. If the user named a target note or section, that is the target; skip to step 3.
- Find where it belongs.
Search the vault (
find/grepby keyword) for an existing note that should hold it. Prefer folding into an existing note over creating a new one - a vault of many tiny orphan notes is worse than fewer living ones. If nothing fits, create a new note in the folder that matches: active work with an end date ->Projects/, ongoing responsibilities ->Areas/, study or reference material ->Resources/; when genuinely unclear,Inbox/. If two existing notes both plausibly fit, ask the user rather than guessing. - Read the target note first. Match its existing structure, heading style, and voice. Never restructure a note while capturing into it; append or insert in the section the user pointed at.
- Distill, don't transcribe.
The standard shape for an example or story:
- What happened, concretely - real file names, real claims, real commands, absolute dates (never "today").
- The turning point - the question asked, the check performed, the thing that contradicted the assumption.
- The outcome - what changed as a result.
- The transferable principle - one or two sentences stating what generalizes, bolded or labeled so it can be found at a glance. Cut anything that only made sense in the conversation's context.
- Report. Tell the user the note path, where in it the capture landed, and the principle line as written.
Style rules (non-negotiable)
- Each full sentence on its own physical line.
- Plain dash
-only; never an em dash. - Wiki-links
[[Note Name]]for references to other vault notes; add them liberally where a related note exists. - Absolute dates (
2026-07-27), never relative ones. - Keep the user's voice: first person ("I asked", "I checked") when the story is about the user's actions - these notes are often rehearsal material the user will speak from.
What this skill is not
- Not a journal: no timestamps-of-conversation, no "Claude said / I said" framing unless the human-AI exchange is itself the point of the story.
- Not a dump: if the capture exceeds ~25 lines, it is probably a transcript wearing a trench coat - distill harder.
- Not a restructuring tool: it never renames, moves, or reorganizes existing notes.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

