change-impact-analyzer
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Maps blast radius of a proposed change across services, APIs, data, and clients. Use before risky merges, migrations, or multi-service work. Emits IMPACT_REPORT. Never approves ship without naming affected consumers.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- imohammadfaraz/claude-skills-for-product-managertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- nahisaho/MUSUBItheir own version, first seen Jan 1, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- nahisaho/MUSUBI★ 74same name
- imohammadfaraz/claude-skills-for-product-manager★ 19same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- adr-enforcerSkill
- ai-eval-harnessSkill
- api-contract-guardianSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- context-loaderSkill
- defect-analystSkill
- delivery-plannerSkill
- engineering-mentorSkill
- engineering-osSkill
- feature-implementerSkill
- guardrails-configuratorSkill
- incident-commanderSkill
- loop-engineerSkill
- migration-surgeonSkill
- model-routerSkill
- observability-designerSkill
- performance-auditorSkill
- postmortem-writerSkill
- pr-generatorSkill
- quality-gateSkill
- refactoring-advisorSkill
- requirements-grillSkill
- security-auditorSkill
- spec-validatorSkill
- tdd-executorSkill
- test-strategy-designerSkill
- threat-modelerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 37
Follow edges: imports, APIs, events, schemas, feature flags, config.
- Distinctive: line 42
Prefer evidence (grep, refs, contracts) over guessing.
- Distinctive: line 43
Do not implement the change.
- Distinctive: line 89
Never claim “no impact” without a search.
- Distinctive: line 90
Never ignore versioning/compat windows for public APIs.
- Distinctive: line 91
Never silently expand scope into implementing the change.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Purpose
Quantify who and what a change breaks or touches so planning and QG can size risk correctly.
When to Use / When NOT to Use
Use when: cross-service changes, API/schema edits, shared library bumps, migrations, large refactors, “what will this break?”.
Do not use when: typo/docs-only; pure local private helper with no exports (lite one-liner OK).
Preconditions
Diff, PR, or proposed change description plus CONTEXT_PACK (or ability to search callers/contracts).
Inputs / Outputs
Inputs: change set / plan, CONTEXT_PACK, OpenAPI/proto/schema if present, TASK_GRAPH optional.
Outputs: IMPACT_REPORT
Upstream / Downstream
Upstream: delivery-planner, feature-implementer, api-contract-guardian, engineering-os.
Downstream: delivery-planner, test-strategy-designer, quality-gate, migration-surgeon, pr-generator.
Core Principles
- Follow edges: imports, APIs, events, schemas, feature flags, config.
- Name concrete consumers (services, packages, mobile/web).
- Separate breaking vs compatible vs unknown.
- Data/migration impact is first-class.
- Unknown consumers → ProceedWithConditions or Block for public APIs.
- Prefer evidence (grep, refs, contracts) over guessing.
- Do not implement the change.
Process
- Summarize the change intent.
- Identify exported surfaces touched (HTTP, RPC, events, DB, packages).
- Trace inbound/outbound dependents in-repo; note external unknowns.
- Classify impact per consumer: None | Compatible | Breaking | Unknown.
- Runtime/ops impact — deploy order, flags, dual-write, cache.
- Test/rollout recommendations.
- Decision for planner/QG.
Evidence Requirements
Cite paths, symbol names, contract files. Mark Unknown explicitly.
Stop Conditions / Failure Modes
| Condition | Action |
| Public API change with Unknown consumers | Block or ProceedWithConditions + required discovery |
| Cannot access codebase | Refuse |
Severity + Confidence
Breaking public contract without migration path → High/Critical.
Output Contract
## IMPACT_REPORT
Change summary: ...
Surfaces touched: ...
Consumers:
- name, impact class, evidence
Deploy/order notes: ...
Unknowns: ...
Decision: Proceed | ProceedWithConditions | Revise | BlockHandoffs
api-contract-guardian, migration-surgeon, delivery-planner, test-strategy-designer, quality-gate.
Never
- Never claim “no impact” without a search.
- Never ignore versioning/compat windows for public APIs.
- Never silently expand scope into implementing the change.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

