agentleFS
willianbswillianbs/skills/change-impact-analyzer/SKILL.md

change-impact-analyzer

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Maps blast radius of a proposed change across services, APIs, data, and clients. Use before risky merges, migrations, or multi-service work. Emits IMPACT_REPORT. Never approves ship without naming affected consumers.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Follow edges: imports, APIs, events, schemas, feature flags, config.

    line 37
  2. Distinctive:

    Prefer evidence (grep, refs, contracts) over guessing.

    line 42
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not implement the change.

    line 43
  4. Distinctive:

    Never claim “no impact” without a search.

    line 89
  5. Distinctive:

    Never ignore versioning/compat windows for public APIs.

    line 90
  6. Distinctive:

    Never silently expand scope into implementing the change.

    line 91

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Purpose

Quantify who and what a change breaks or touches so planning and QG can size risk correctly.

When to Use / When NOT to Use

Use when: cross-service changes, API/schema edits, shared library bumps, migrations, large refactors, “what will this break?”.

Do not use when: typo/docs-only; pure local private helper with no exports (lite one-liner OK).

Preconditions

Diff, PR, or proposed change description plus CONTEXT_PACK (or ability to search callers/contracts).

Inputs / Outputs

Inputs: change set / plan, CONTEXT_PACK, OpenAPI/proto/schema if present, TASK_GRAPH optional.

Outputs: IMPACT_REPORT

Upstream / Downstream

Upstream: delivery-planner, feature-implementer, api-contract-guardian, engineering-os.

Downstream: delivery-planner, test-strategy-designer, quality-gate, migration-surgeon, pr-generator.

Core Principles

  1. Follow edges: imports, APIs, events, schemas, feature flags, config.
  2. Name concrete consumers (services, packages, mobile/web).
  3. Separate breaking vs compatible vs unknown.
  4. Data/migration impact is first-class.
  5. Unknown consumers → ProceedWithConditions or Block for public APIs.
  6. Prefer evidence (grep, refs, contracts) over guessing.
  7. Do not implement the change.

Process

  1. Summarize the change intent.
  2. Identify exported surfaces touched (HTTP, RPC, events, DB, packages).
  3. Trace inbound/outbound dependents in-repo; note external unknowns.
  4. Classify impact per consumer: None | Compatible | Breaking | Unknown.
  5. Runtime/ops impact — deploy order, flags, dual-write, cache.
  6. Test/rollout recommendations.
  7. Decision for planner/QG.

Evidence Requirements

Cite paths, symbol names, contract files. Mark Unknown explicitly.

Stop Conditions / Failure Modes

ConditionAction
Public API change with Unknown consumersBlock or ProceedWithConditions + required discovery
Cannot access codebaseRefuse

Severity + Confidence

Breaking public contract without migration path → High/Critical.

Output Contract

## IMPACT_REPORT
Change summary: ...
Surfaces touched: ...
Consumers:
  - name, impact class, evidence
Deploy/order notes: ...
Unknowns: ...
Decision: Proceed | ProceedWithConditions | Revise | Block

Handoffs

api-contract-guardian, migration-surgeon, delivery-planner, test-strategy-designer, quality-gate.

Never

  • Never claim “no impact” without a search.
  • Never ignore versioning/compat windows for public APIs.
  • Never silently expand scope into implementing the change.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.