seo-geo
Skill0 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Make a page rank in Google and get cited by AI answer engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Google AI Overviews). Audits or writes the page with an answer-first structure, specific numbers with sources, FAQ and article schema, clean meta tags, internal links, and crawl access for AI bots. Use when the user mentions SEO, GEO, AI search visibility, "rank for", "get cited by ChatGPT", schema, JSON-LD, meta tags, or indexing.
55 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- seranking/seo-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- julianosirtori/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alpit-patel/seo-aeo-geo-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- figueroaignacio/ignaciofigueroa.devtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- theexperiencecompany/gaiatheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- Littlpinguin/marketing-cockpit-templatetheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use seo-agentic, seo-competitor-pages and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AgriciDanielSkillseo-agentic
Audit and fix agent readiness: the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing fraction, accessibility tree for agents, robots.txt and Content-Signal for AI agents, WAF treatment of agent traffic, llms.txt, Markdown delivery, ai-catalog.json, /.well-known discovery files, and WebMCP tools. Use when the user asks whether AI agents can use or browse the site, or about llms.txt or WebMCP. Exclude AI citability and brand signals (seo-geo) and commerce protocol depth (seo-ecommerce).
Also in 5 projects that use this
megastepSkillseo-competitor-pages
Generate SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages. Covers "X vs Y" layouts, "alternatives to X" pages, feature matrices, schema markup, and conversion optimization. Use when user says "comparison page", "vs page", "alternatives page", "competitor comparison", or "X vs Y".
Also in 21 projects that use this
megastepSkillseo-images
Image optimization analysis for SEO and performance. Checks alt text, file sizes, formats, responsive images, lazy loading, and CLS prevention. Use when user says "image optimization", "alt text", "image SEO", "image size", or "image audit".
Also in 20 projects that use this
timruebenachSkillseo-google
Google SEO APIs: Search Console (Search Analytics, URL Inspection, Sitemaps), PageSpeed Insights v5, CrUX field data with 25-week history, Indexing API v3, and GA4 organic traffic. Provides real Google field data for Core Web Vitals, indexation status, search performance, and organic traffic trends. Use when user says "search console", "GSC", "PageSpeed", "CrUX", "field data", "indexing API", "GA4 organic", "URL inspection", "google api setup", "real CWV data", "impressions", "clicks", "CTR", "position data", "LCP", "INP", "CLS", "FCP", "TTFB", or "Lighthouse scores".
Also in 13 projects that use this
timruebenachSkillseo-image-gen
AI image generation for SEO assets: OG/social preview images, blog hero images, schema images, product photography, infographics. Powered by Gemini via nanobanana-mcp. Requires banana extension installed. Use when user says \"generate image\", \"OG image\", \"social preview\", \"hero image\", \"blog image\", \"product photo\", \"infographic\", \"seo image\", \"create visual\", \"image-gen\", \"favicon\", \"schema image\", \"pinterest pin\", \"generate visual\", \"banner\", or \"thumbnail\".
Also in 12 projects that use this
- +3 more from megastep
- +4 more from timruebenach
Other versions55 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 55
- AgriciDaniel/claude-seo★ 20ksame name
- ReScienceLab/opc-skills★ 1.9ksame name
- theexperiencecompany/gaia★ 325same name
- eunomia-bpf/eunomia.dev★ 244same name
- seranking/seo-skills★ 201same name
- zhtyyx/codex-seo★ 152same name
- PostPlusAI/postplus-skills★ 27same name
- chuhaiqu/skills★ 22same name
- coopersimson96/ai-content-system★ 17same name
- whyashthakker/agent-skills-marketing★ 15same name
45 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 50 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Check demand if you have a keyword tool or Search Console.
- Distinctive: line 14
Check what ranks now. Your page must be better than the top result on at least one thing: newer, more specific, tested by hand, or simpler.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 50 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
SEO + GEO
Two readers decide if a page wins: a search engine that ranks it, and an AI engine that quotes it. Both reward the same thing: a page that answers a real question clearly, with facts it can prove.
1. Pick the question
- One page, one main question. Write it the way a person types or asks it ("how much does Claude Code cost", not "Claude Code pricing considerations").
- Check demand if you have a keyword tool or Search Console. If not, use the search engine's own suggestions and "People also ask".
- Check what ranks now. Your page must be better than the top result on at least one thing: newer, more specific, tested by hand, or simpler.
2. Structure for quoting
- Answer first. The first 40 to 60 words under the H1 answer the question directly, with a number if there is one. An AI engine often quotes this block.
- Headings as questions people ask. Each section starts with its direct answer, then the detail.
- Specific facts with sources. Numbers, dates, names, each linked to a primary source. Pages with clear stats and citations get quoted more.
- Tables for comparisons and prices. Lists for steps.
- Date it. Show "Updated
<date>" and keep it true. - Show who wrote it and why they know (author bio, hands-on testing).
3. Technical checks
- Title under about 60 characters with the main term near the start. Meta description under about 155 characters that answers, not teases.
- One H1. Descriptive URL slug.
- JSON-LD:
ArticleorBlogPosting(headline, author, datePublished, dateModified, image),FAQPagefor a real FAQ section,BreadcrumbList. Validate it. Never mark up content that is not on the page. - Canonical URL set. No duplicate pages competing for one question.
robots.txtdoes not block AI crawlers you want (GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended) unless the owner chose to block them. Ask before you change this.- Images: modern format (WebP or AVIF), compressed, descriptive alt text, width and height set.
- An
llms.txtfile is optional and cheap. Add it only if the site wants one.
4. Links
- Link out to primary sources.
- Link in: add the new page to 2 to 5 related pages on the same site, with anchor text that says what the target is. Add links back from those pages too.
5. Report
For an audit: a list of fixes, worst first, each with the exact change. For a new page: the page, the schema, and the list of internal links you added. Do not promise rankings. Say what to measure (impressions, clicks, AI citations) and when to check again (2 to 4 weeks).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

