agentleFS
whyashthakkerwhyashthakker/estack/skills/premortem/SKILL.md

premortem

Skill0 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub

Run a premortem on a plan, launch, migration, or change before it ships. Assume it already failed, list the most likely reasons, rank them by likelihood and cost, and turn the top risks into checks, guards, or a rollback plan. Use when the user says "premortem", "what could go wrong", "stress test this plan", "is this safe to ship", or before a launch, a data migration, a pricing change, a big refactor, or anything costly to undo.

42 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use community-led-growth, ph-community-outreach and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • nicepkgSkill

    community-led-growth

    Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    ph-community-outreach

    Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • xfstudioSkill

    micro-saas-launcher

    Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • mastepanoskiSkill

    ux-audit-rethink

    Comprehensive UX audit using IxDF's 7 factors, 5 usability characteristics, and 5 interaction dimensions. Holistic evaluation with redesign proposals based on user-centered design principles.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • ncklrsSkill

    seo-content-strategist

    Expert SEO content strategy for SaaS and B2B sites. Use when doing keyword research, planning content clusters, creating pillar pages, optimizing on-page SEO, fixing technical SEO issues, building links, refreshing content, implementing programmatic SEO, mapping search intent, optimizing for SERP features, or measuring content performance. Use for SEO audits, content gap analysis, and organic growth strategy.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • parcadeiSkill

    agent-context-isolation

    Agent Context Isolation

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +6 more from nicepkg

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 38 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the real code and config for each one you suspect.

    line 26

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 38 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Premortem

Goal: find the failure before your users do. People are better at explaining a failure than predicting one, so start from the failure.

1. State the plan

In three lines: what will change, who it affects, and how you will know it worked (one measurable signal). If you cannot write the signal, that is the first risk.

2. Assume it failed

"It is 30 days later. This failed badly. Why?" Write 8 to 12 causes. Cover each area:

  • Data: loss, corruption, wrong migration order, no backup, bad defaults for old rows.
  • Users: confusing change, broken links or bookmarks, emails that go to the wrong people, a step they did not expect.
  • Money: wrong price or currency, double charge, free access by mistake, a cost spike (API, compute, email).
  • Scale and timing: a cron job and a deploy at the same time, rate limits, a cold cache, time zones.
  • Dependencies: a third-party API changes or fails, an expired key, a quota.
  • People: the one person who knows it is away, no one watching after launch.
  • Security: a new endpoint with no auth, secrets in logs, user input passed to an agent or a shell.

Read the real code and config for each one you suspect. A risk you checked beats a risk you imagined.

3. Rank

For each cause: likelihood (low, med, high), cost if it happens (low, med, high), and whether it is easy to undo. Keep the top 3 to 5: high on two of the three.

4. Turn risks into actions

For each top risk, one of:

  • Prevent: a test, a validation, a guard, a feature flag, a dry run.
  • Detect: an alert, a log line, a dashboard check at a set time after launch.
  • Recover: a written rollback step that someone has tried once.

5. Report

A short table (risk, likelihood, cost, action, owner), then a go / go-with-fixes / stop call with one line of reason. Do not make the fixes in this skill unless the user asks. Ship after with ship.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.