agentleFS
wfukatsuwfukatsu/slide-forge/skills/scalar-nurture-intake/SKILL.md

scalar-nurture-intake

Skill5 starsChanged 58 days agoMITView on GitHub

Turn pre-deal signals — webinar and seminar attendance, inbound enquiries, download logs, community questions, event badge notes, partner referrals, CRM/MA exports — into segment definitions, five-stage nurture tracks and a content ledger. Works on segment types, never on named individuals. Use for: ナーチャリングを設計して, リード育成, 問い合わせからセグメントを起こして, ウェビナーの参加者を整理, コンテンツの棚卸し, MQL / SQO. Not: once a lead is handed over — per-customer records (scalar-deal-intake), the deck (scalar-product-slides), the proposal (scalar-proposal-slides).

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Never write a personal name, a company name, an email address or a job title tied to an individual into accounts/_nurture/.

    line 53
  2. Very specific:

    If a signal matters because of *who* it came from, it is a deal, not a segment.

    line 57
  3. Distinctive:

    Read the attendance log, enquiry email, download log, community thread, event notes, partner referral and CRM/MA export before asking …

    line 66
  4. Very specific:

    When you do number one, check the existing list first and never reuse an ID.

    line 107
  5. Very specific:

    Write the story as the buyer's narrative, not the pitch.

    line 150
  6. Very specific:

    When a lead does cross over, hand to scalar-deal-intake with: the contact history, which content they consumed, the questions they asked, …

    line 190
  7. Distinctive:

    When a lead has gone quiet, fill §6 instead: which stage they stalled at, the likely reason, which stage to return them to, and what …

    line 195
  8. Very specific:

    Do not put a personal name, company name or contact detail into accounts/_nurture/.

    line 210
  9. Distinctive:

    Do not create or number a segment from one signal.

    line 213
  10. Distinctive:

    Do not judge stage by activity volume.

    line 214
  11. Very specific:

    Do not treat the sheet's product positioning as current — it is from 2021 and omits ScalarDB Cluster, ScalarDB Analytics and cross-RDB …

    line 215
  12. Very specific:

    Do not invent metrics targets.

    line 218
  13. Distinctive:

    Do not copy the nurture stage number into the deal stage (see §6).

    line 238

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

日本語

Scalar Nurture Intake

Pre-deal signals in, nurture design out. This skill produces Markdown under accounts/_nurture/. It generates no slides.

Working directory: the slide-forge root.

Sources of truth — this skill redefines none of them:

ConcernSource
The five nurture stagesnurture-map.md §1
Product layer / segment layer / what the sheet leaves unfinishedsame file §3 / §4 / §7
The deal stages a lead is handed tostage-io-map.md §1
The g1.* gatessales-playbook.md §2
Problem-to-product mappingproposal-map.md §4

Open the named section, not the file — these are 16–27KB each, and a full read of all four costs more than this entire skill.

Boundaries

RequestWhere it goes
Define a segment; design a nurture track; audit content coverageThis skill
Decide whether a lead is ready for salesThis skill (§6)
Records for one named customer once a deal existsscalar-deal-intake
The account ledger and activity-plan deckscalar-account-plan
Materials for one visitscalar-ae-materials
Company / product decks (not customer-specific)scalar-product-slides
Customer-specific proposalscalar-proposal-slides

Nurture files hold types, not people

A segment is a pattern, not a person or a company. Attendance lists, enquiry email and CRM exports contain personal data; the nurture files must not.

  • Never write a personal name, a company name, an email address or a job title tied to an individual into accounts/_nurture/.
  • Aggregate the signal into the type: "three enquiries in the last quarter from MySQL users hitting column overloading" — not who sent them.
  • If a signal matters because of who it came from, it is a deal, not a segment. Route it to scalar-deal-intake.

accounts/ is gitignored. Do not commit filled files either way.

Workflow

1. Read everything supplied first

Read the attendance log, enquiry email, download log, community thread, event notes, partner referral and CRM/MA export before asking anything. Accept local paths, pasted text, Drive URLs and Gmail threads.

Record what was read as counts and dates — "webinar 2026-07-15, 42 attendees, 11 with questions" — not as a roster.

2. Locate the segment

ls accounts/_nurture/segments/
ls accounts/*/            # live deals — always check before segmenting

First, check whether the signal came from someone already in a live deal. Sending nurture content to a contact inside a running deal is an incident.

Outcome of the checkWhat to do
From a customer with a live dealKeep it out of the segment. Route to scalar-deal-intake; the material belongs in that deal's deal-log.md §1
Same customer, different division or use caseTell the AE first. Whether it goes into nurture is the AE's call
No dealProceed with segmentation as normal

Recording that the check happened is fine, but never write the company or personal names used for the check into accounts/_nurture/ — record counts only, e.g. "1 overlap with a live deal, excluded".

Match each signal against the existing segment definitions and against nurture-map.md §5. For each signal, one of three outcomes:

OutcomeWhat to do
Matches an existing segmentAdd the evidence to that track
Close to one, but the situation differsRecord it as a variant on the existing segment. Do not fork a new one yet
Matches nothingPark it in a "candidate segments" list with the count

Do not create a segment from a single signal. One enquiry is an anecdote. Promote a candidate to a numbered segment when the same situation appears at least three times, or when someone decides deliberately to invest in it — and record which of the two it was.

When you do number one, check the existing list first and never reuse an ID. The source sheet has a duplicate AWS #009 (nurture-map.md §7-2); do not add another.

3. Judge the nurture stage

Stage is set by what the buyer is looking for (nurture-map.md §1), not by how much they downloaded.

SignalStage
Does not yet see anything to fix0. Education
Knows the problem, no project, has not narrowed it down1. Need
Looking for products that solve it2. Research
Comparing and narrowing candidates3. Evaluation
Deciding to buy4. Selection

"Attended a webinar" is not a stage. State the buyer situation that puts them there, and cite the signal it came from.

4. Fill the track

mkdir -p accounts/_nurture/segments accounts/_nurture/tracks
cp templates/nurture/segment-sheet.ja.md accounts/_nurture/segments/<Segment No.>.md
cp templates/nurture/nurture-track.ja.md accounts/_nurture/tracks/<Segment No.>.md
cp templates/nurture/content-inventory.ja.md accounts/_nurture/content-inventory.md

Snapshot before editing an existing file (cp x.md x.md.bak-YYYYMMDD) and append rather than overwrite.

What the raw material is actually good for:

MaterialWhat it feeds
Answers collected at an event (hearing-slides' event-poll / collect-qr)§1–§5 story, and content coverage (§10)
Questions asked at a webinar or in a community§7 power script — the objections and the branches
Enquiry email wording§1–§5 story, in the buyer's own words
What they downloaded, and in what orderContent coverage (§10) and the stage judgement
What they asked that we could not answer§11 open items, and a content gap
Why a lead went quiet§6 re-engagement

Write the story as the buyer's narrative, not the pitch. Keep unverified claims marked (仮説) — the source sheet does this and it is worth copying.

5. Update the content ledger

The thin stages have templates: value-message for 0–1, use-case-one-pager for 1–2, whitepaper-abstract for 3, the case-studies pack for cases, and event-announce / session-agenda / speaker-intro for events. The briefs behind them live in templates/marketing/.

Fill §2 (coverage by stage) in content-inventory.md. The stage with the most 無 is where the track is stuck — say so explicitly rather than listing every gap flatly.

Apply the three-month rule to case studies, pricing, edition structure and performance numbers (nurture-map.md freshness warning). Mark stale entries 要更新; never delete them.

6. Decide the hand-off or the re-engagement

The sheet defines neither MQL nor SQO, so use the deal-side gates (nurture-map.md §2):

JudgementGate
May approach as MQL → SQOg1.problem-recognized
May open deal stage 1g1.owner-reached
May move to deal stage 2g1.timeframe-6q

Verdicts are met / partial / unmet. A download or a webinar seat is never evidence for met.

Do not derive the deal stage from the nurture stage. The nurture stage marks where the buyer's interest sits; the deal stage marks what has been agreed — two different rulers (nurture-map.md §2). Open at deal stage 1 as a rule. A lead arriving from nurture 4 (Selection) is not "in deal stage 4"; it is "in deal stage 1, with only the customer's clock at stage 4." Do not propose moving to a proposal with g2.goal-agreed and decisionCriteria skipped. Where discovery has to be compressed, hand over what was dropped as a risk for deal-log.md §3.

When a lead does cross over, hand to scalar-deal-intake with: the contact history, which content they consumed, the questions they asked, and the questions still unanswered. The named-individual detail lives only on the deal side, under accounts/<AE>/<customer>/.

When a lead has gone quiet, fill §6 instead: which stage they stalled at, the likely reason, which stage to return them to, and what content to send.

7. Report the diff

In Japanese:

  1. Files created or updated, and what was added
  2. Which segments the signals landed in, and which are still candidates (with counts)
  3. The stage where content is thinnest, and what to build next
  4. Leads ready to hand to sales, with the gate evidence
  5. Anything the material contradicts in an existing track

Refusals and cautions

  • Do not put a personal name, company name or contact detail into accounts/_nurture/. If the request needs that, it belongs in scalar-deal-intake.
  • Do not create or number a segment from one signal.
  • Do not judge stage by activity volume.
  • Do not treat the sheet's product positioning as current — it is from 2021 and omits ScalarDB Cluster, ScalarDB Analytics and cross-RDB transactions (nurture-map.md §7-8). Say so when a segment is built on the old framing.
  • Do not invent metrics targets. The policy is to take one or two quarters of actuals first (nurture-map.md §7-10); leave the target column as "(実績待ち)". Do fill the measurement source (which MA/CRM field it is read from) — without it there are no actuals to take.
  • Email has default intervals (monthly at stages 0–1, fortnightly at 2, weekly at 3–4). Override them if the segment needs it, but say why in the track, and keep to at most four sends a month to one lead.
  • Never copy event answers straight into accounts/_nurture/. The collection slides are hearing-slides and the sheet behind them is hearing-sheet. Only aggregates — type and count — belong here; an answer that identifies a company or a person is a deal, and goes to scalar-deal-intake (references/hearing-kit.md §4).
  • Never write consent or opt-out records into accounts/_nurture/. They are tied to individuals and belong in MA/CRM (nurture-map.md §8). What goes in the nurture files is the type-level fact of which consent basis each reach channel rests on (segment-sheet.ja.md §4).
  • Do not rule on whether sending is lawful. Present the consent / opt-out / disclosure points from nurture-map.md §8 and report that legal must confirm. A track whose reach channels have no consent basis recorded is never reported as ready to send.
  • Do not copy the nurture stage number into the deal stage (see §6).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.