scalar-nurture-intake
Skill5 starsChanged 58 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turn pre-deal signals — webinar and seminar attendance, inbound enquiries, download logs, community questions, event badge notes, partner referrals, CRM/MA exports — into segment definitions, five-stage nurture tracks and a content ledger. Works on segment types, never on named individuals. Use for: ナーチャリングを設計して, リード育成, 問い合わせからセグメントを起こして, ウェビナーの参加者を整理, コンテンツの棚卸し, MQL / SQO. Not: once a lead is handed over — per-customer records (scalar-deal-intake), the deck (scalar-product-slides), the proposal (scalar-proposal-slides).
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- forgeSkill
- analysis-template-creatorSkill
- b2b-account-mapsSkill
- calendar-slidesSkill
- current-state-analysisSkill
- drawio-diagramsSkill
- google-slidesSkill
- google-slides-templateSkill
- hearing-sheetSkill
- hearing-slidesSkill
- image-slotsSkill
- nexus-report-slidesSkill
- pptx-exportSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
- scalar-account-planning-sessionSkill
- scalar-account-planSkill
- scalar-ae-materialsSkill
- scalar-deal-intakeSkill
- scalar-product-slidesSkill
- scalar-proposal-slidesSkill
- settingsSkill
- slide-qaSkill
- slide-template-creatorSkill
- spreadsheetsSkill
- template-forgeSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 53
Never write a personal name, a company name, an email address or a job title tied to an individual into accounts/_nurture/.
- Very specific: line 57
If a signal matters because of *who* it came from, it is a deal, not a segment.
- Distinctive: line 66
Read the attendance log, enquiry email, download log, community thread, event notes, partner referral and CRM/MA export before asking …
- Very specific: line 107
When you do number one, check the existing list first and never reuse an ID.
- Very specific: line 150
Write the story as the buyer's narrative, not the pitch.
- Very specific: line 190
When a lead does cross over, hand to scalar-deal-intake with: the contact history, which content they consumed, the questions they asked, …
- Distinctive: line 195
When a lead has gone quiet, fill §6 instead: which stage they stalled at, the likely reason, which stage to return them to, and what …
- Very specific: line 210
Do not put a personal name, company name or contact detail into accounts/_nurture/.
- Distinctive: line 213
Do not create or number a segment from one signal.
- Distinctive: line 214
Do not judge stage by activity volume.
- Very specific: line 215
Do not treat the sheet's product positioning as current — it is from 2021 and omits ScalarDB Cluster, ScalarDB Analytics and cross-RDB …
- Very specific: line 218
Do not invent metrics targets.
- Distinctive: line 238
Do not copy the nurture stage number into the deal stage (see §6).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
日本語
Scalar Nurture Intake
Pre-deal signals in, nurture design out. This skill produces Markdown under
accounts/_nurture/. It generates no slides.
Working directory: the slide-forge root.
Sources of truth — this skill redefines none of them:
| Concern | Source |
| The five nurture stages | nurture-map.md §1 |
| Product layer / segment layer / what the sheet leaves unfinished | same file §3 / §4 / §7 |
| The deal stages a lead is handed to | stage-io-map.md §1 |
The g1.* gates | sales-playbook.md §2 |
| Problem-to-product mapping | proposal-map.md §4 |
Open the named section, not the file — these are 16–27KB each, and a full read of all four costs more than this entire skill.
Boundaries
| Request | Where it goes |
| Define a segment; design a nurture track; audit content coverage | This skill |
| Decide whether a lead is ready for sales | This skill (§6) |
| Records for one named customer once a deal exists | scalar-deal-intake |
| The account ledger and activity-plan deck | scalar-account-plan |
| Materials for one visit | scalar-ae-materials |
| Company / product decks (not customer-specific) | scalar-product-slides |
| Customer-specific proposal | scalar-proposal-slides |
Nurture files hold types, not people
A segment is a pattern, not a person or a company. Attendance lists, enquiry email and CRM exports contain personal data; the nurture files must not.
- Never write a personal name, a company name, an email address or a job title
tied to an individual into
accounts/_nurture/. - Aggregate the signal into the type: "three enquiries in the last quarter from MySQL users hitting column overloading" — not who sent them.
- If a signal matters because of who it came from, it is a deal, not a
segment. Route it to
scalar-deal-intake.
accounts/ is gitignored. Do not commit filled files either way.
Workflow
1. Read everything supplied first
Read the attendance log, enquiry email, download log, community thread, event notes, partner referral and CRM/MA export before asking anything. Accept local paths, pasted text, Drive URLs and Gmail threads.
Record what was read as counts and dates — "webinar 2026-07-15, 42 attendees, 11 with questions" — not as a roster.
2. Locate the segment
ls accounts/_nurture/segments/
ls accounts/*/ # live deals — always check before segmentingFirst, check whether the signal came from someone already in a live deal. Sending nurture content to a contact inside a running deal is an incident.
| Outcome of the check | What to do |
| From a customer with a live deal | Keep it out of the segment. Route to scalar-deal-intake; the material belongs in that deal's deal-log.md §1 |
| Same customer, different division or use case | Tell the AE first. Whether it goes into nurture is the AE's call |
| No deal | Proceed with segmentation as normal |
Recording that the check happened is fine, but never write the company or personal
names used for the check into accounts/_nurture/ — record counts only, e.g.
"1 overlap with a live deal, excluded".
Match each signal against the existing segment definitions and against
nurture-map.md §5. For each signal, one of three outcomes:
| Outcome | What to do |
| Matches an existing segment | Add the evidence to that track |
| Close to one, but the situation differs | Record it as a variant on the existing segment. Do not fork a new one yet |
| Matches nothing | Park it in a "candidate segments" list with the count |
Do not create a segment from a single signal. One enquiry is an anecdote. Promote a candidate to a numbered segment when the same situation appears at least three times, or when someone decides deliberately to invest in it — and record which of the two it was.
When you do number one, check the existing list first and never reuse an ID.
The source sheet has a duplicate AWS #009 (nurture-map.md §7-2); do not add
another.
3. Judge the nurture stage
Stage is set by what the buyer is looking for (nurture-map.md §1), not by
how much they downloaded.
| Signal | Stage |
| Does not yet see anything to fix | 0. Education |
| Knows the problem, no project, has not narrowed it down | 1. Need |
| Looking for products that solve it | 2. Research |
| Comparing and narrowing candidates | 3. Evaluation |
| Deciding to buy | 4. Selection |
"Attended a webinar" is not a stage. State the buyer situation that puts them there, and cite the signal it came from.
4. Fill the track
mkdir -p accounts/_nurture/segments accounts/_nurture/tracks
cp templates/nurture/segment-sheet.ja.md accounts/_nurture/segments/<Segment No.>.md
cp templates/nurture/nurture-track.ja.md accounts/_nurture/tracks/<Segment No.>.md
cp templates/nurture/content-inventory.ja.md accounts/_nurture/content-inventory.mdSnapshot before editing an existing file (cp x.md x.md.bak-YYYYMMDD) and append
rather than overwrite.
What the raw material is actually good for:
| Material | What it feeds |
Answers collected at an event (hearing-slides' event-poll / collect-qr) | §1–§5 story, and content coverage (§10) |
| Questions asked at a webinar or in a community | §7 power script — the objections and the branches |
| Enquiry email wording | §1–§5 story, in the buyer's own words |
| What they downloaded, and in what order | Content coverage (§10) and the stage judgement |
| What they asked that we could not answer | §11 open items, and a content gap |
| Why a lead went quiet | §6 re-engagement |
Write the story as the buyer's narrative, not the pitch. Keep unverified claims
marked (仮説) — the source sheet does this and it is worth copying.
5. Update the content ledger
The thin stages have templates: value-message for 0–1,
use-case-one-pager for 1–2, whitepaper-abstract for 3, the case-studies
pack for cases, and event-announce / session-agenda / speaker-intro for
events. The briefs behind them live in templates/marketing/.
Fill §2 (coverage by stage) in content-inventory.md. The stage with the most
無 is where the track is stuck — say so explicitly rather than listing every
gap flatly.
Apply the three-month rule to case studies, pricing, edition structure and
performance numbers (nurture-map.md freshness warning). Mark stale entries
要更新; never delete them.
6. Decide the hand-off or the re-engagement
The sheet defines neither MQL nor SQO, so use the deal-side gates
(nurture-map.md §2):
| Judgement | Gate |
| May approach as MQL → SQO | g1.problem-recognized |
| May open deal stage 1 | g1.owner-reached |
| May move to deal stage 2 | g1.timeframe-6q |
Verdicts are met / partial / unmet. A download or a webinar seat is never
evidence for met.
Do not derive the deal stage from the nurture stage. The nurture stage marks
where the buyer's interest sits; the deal stage marks what has been agreed — two
different rulers (nurture-map.md §2). Open at deal stage 1 as a rule. A lead
arriving from nurture 4 (Selection) is not "in deal stage 4"; it is "in deal
stage 1, with only the customer's clock at stage 4." Do not propose moving to a
proposal with g2.goal-agreed and decisionCriteria skipped. Where discovery has
to be compressed, hand over what was dropped as a risk for deal-log.md §3.
When a lead does cross over, hand to scalar-deal-intake with: the contact
history, which content they consumed, the questions they asked, and the
questions still unanswered. The named-individual detail lives only on the deal
side, under accounts/<AE>/<customer>/.
When a lead has gone quiet, fill §6 instead: which stage they stalled at, the likely reason, which stage to return them to, and what content to send.
7. Report the diff
In Japanese:
- Files created or updated, and what was added
- Which segments the signals landed in, and which are still candidates (with counts)
- The stage where content is thinnest, and what to build next
- Leads ready to hand to sales, with the gate evidence
- Anything the material contradicts in an existing track
Refusals and cautions
- Do not put a personal name, company name or contact detail into
accounts/_nurture/. If the request needs that, it belongs inscalar-deal-intake. - Do not create or number a segment from one signal.
- Do not judge stage by activity volume.
- Do not treat the sheet's product positioning as current — it is from 2021 and
omits ScalarDB Cluster, ScalarDB Analytics and cross-RDB transactions
(
nurture-map.md§7-8). Say so when a segment is built on the old framing. - Do not invent metrics targets. The policy is to take one or two quarters of
actuals first (
nurture-map.md§7-10); leave the target column as "(実績待ち)". Do fill the measurement source (which MA/CRM field it is read from) — without it there are no actuals to take. - Email has default intervals (monthly at stages 0–1, fortnightly at 2, weekly at 3–4). Override them if the segment needs it, but say why in the track, and keep to at most four sends a month to one lead.
- Never copy event answers straight into
accounts/_nurture/. The collection slides arehearing-slidesand the sheet behind them ishearing-sheet. Only aggregates — type and count — belong here; an answer that identifies a company or a person is a deal, and goes toscalar-deal-intake(references/hearing-kit.md§4). - Never write consent or opt-out records into
accounts/_nurture/. They are tied to individuals and belong in MA/CRM (nurture-map.md§8). What goes in the nurture files is the type-level fact of which consent basis each reach channel rests on (segment-sheet.ja.md§4). - Do not rule on whether sending is lawful. Present the consent / opt-out /
disclosure points from
nurture-map.md§8 and report that legal must confirm. A track whose reach channels have no consent basis recorded is never reported as ready to send. - Do not copy the nurture stage number into the deal stage (see §6).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

