verification-before-completion
Skill4 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Verify completion claims with fresh evidence. Iron Law: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE. Load when about to claim complete/fixed/passing; before commit/PR/task done.
189 other projects use a version of this, 139 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXedited, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravityedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-trioedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DJtx001/ai-coding-playbookedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Ai-assistant-KIRA/antigravity-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
obraSkilldiagnosing-superpowers
Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
Also in 20 projects that use this
jh941213Skilldocs-ci
문서 CI(링크·OpenAPI lint·breaking 게이트·mermaid 검증)나 문서 드리프트 감지(docs.yaml 신선도 검사)를 설치하거나 돌릴 때 사용. 문서 내용 작성은 docs-architecture·docs-interfaces·docs-manuals.
Also in 3 projects that use this
jh941213Skilldocs-interfaces
API·이벤트 인터페이스 문서(OpenAPI·swagger·AsyncAPI 명세, 엔드포인트 레퍼런스, API 구성도·시퀀스, API CHANGELOG)를 만들거나 코드와 맞출 때 사용. 시스템 구성도는 docs-architecture, API 설계 원칙은 api-design-principles.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from Leodorareluctant259
- +4 more from jh941213
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 139
- obra/superpowers★ 314k46% same
- openai/plugins★ 7.8k46% same
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6k40% same
- lingyired/status-trio★ 1.8k46% same
- pcvelz/superpowers★ 1.3k46% same
- DemonDamon/AgenticX★ 1k40% same
- coco-research/coco★ 79739% same
- pedronauck/skills★ 64946% same
- koaning/wigglystuff★ 45540% same
- derHaken/SuperAntigravity★ 43940% same
129 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 50
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- GanyuanRan/Aegis★ 1.4ksame name
- KbWen/agentic-os★ 229same name
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimized★ 146same name
- TheGoat395/Codex-Skills★ 136same name
- shibit-net/xuanji-community★ 90same name
- withzombies/hyperpowers★ 80same name
- GEd520/legados★ 75same name
- tranhieutt/software_development_department★ 71same name
- ivyfan-toowell/IvyClaw★ 66same name
40 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository35 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- 12-factor-appSkill
- caveman-commitSkill
- caveman-reviewSkill
- cavemanSkill
- conventional-commitsSkill
- creating-pull-requestsSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- forge-cleanupSkill
- forge-docsSkill
- forge-eu-accessibilitySkill
- forge-flowSkill
- forge-initSkill
- forge-seoSkill
- forge-setupSkill
- forgeSkill
- forge-tailwindcss-conventionsSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- git-issue-trackerSkill
- grillingSkill
- kiss-principleSkill
- loopsSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- prototypeSkill
- pr-resolveSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- ste100Skill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- use-git-identitySkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- wayfinderSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 1 is common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
1
Common
Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Iron Law: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE.
- Common: line 11
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Verification Before Completion
Iron Law: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE.
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
The Gate — run before ANY completion claim
- IDENTIFY — what command proves the claim?
- RUN — execute the FULL command (fresh, complete).
- READ — full output, check exit code, count failures.
- VERIFY — does output confirm the claim?
- NO → state actual status with evidence
- YES → state claim WITH evidence
- ONLY THEN make the claim.
Skip any step = lying, not verifying.
Common failures — what proves each claim
| Claim | Requires | Not sufficient |
| Tests pass | Test command: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
Key patterns (evidence templates)
Tests:
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"Regression (TDD Red-Green):
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (no red-green)Build:
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter ≠ compiler)Requirements:
✅ Re-read plan → Checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"Agent delegation:
✅ Agent reports → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent reportRed flags — STOP if you catch yourself
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!")
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- "Just this once" / "I'm tired" / "Confidence ≠ evidence"
When to apply
ALWAYS before:
- ANY success/completion claim
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- Committing, PR creation, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents
Rule applies to exact phrases, paraphrases, synonyms, implications of success.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

