semgrep
Skill547 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run Semgrep static analysis across a codebase, optionally using Semgrep Pro for cross-file taint analysis. Use when Semgrep or a static-analysis scan is requested; use security-review for a manual audit.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Run a Semgrep scan with automatic language detection, parallel execution via subagents when the host supports delegation (otherwise scan …
- Distinctive: line 36
All scan results, SARIF files, and temporary data are stored in a single output directory.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Semgrep Security Scan
Run a Semgrep scan with automatic language detection, parallel execution via subagents when the host supports delegation (otherwise scan sequentially), and merged SARIF output.
Essential Principles
- Always use
--metrics=off— Semgrep sends telemetry by default;--config autoalso phones home. Everysemgrepcommand must include--metrics=offto prevent data leakage during security audits. - User must approve the scan plan (Step 3 is a hard gate) — The original "scan this codebase" request is NOT approval. Present exact rulesets, target, engine, and mode; wait for explicit "yes"/"proceed" before spawning scanners.
- Third-party rulesets are required, not optional — Trail of Bits, 0xdea, and Decurity rules catch vulnerabilities absent from the official registry. Include them whenever the detected language matches.
- Launch all scans concurrently when the host supports subagent delegation — parallel execution per language/category is the core performance advantage. If the host has no subagent/parallel-task mechanism, run the scans sequentially instead of one Task at a time.
- Always check for Semgrep Pro before scanning — Pro enables cross-file taint tracking and catches ~250% more true positives. Skipping the check means silently missing critical inter-file vulnerabilities.
When to Use
- Security audit of a codebase
- Finding vulnerabilities before code review
- Scanning for known bug patterns
- First-pass static analysis
When NOT to Use
- Binary analysis → Use binary analysis tools
- Already have Semgrep CI configured → Use existing pipeline
- Need cross-file analysis but no Pro license → Consider CodeQL as alternative
- Creating custom Semgrep rules → Use
semgrep-rule-creatorskill - Porting existing rules to other languages → Use
semgrep-rule-variant-creatorskill
Output Directory
All scan results, SARIF files, and temporary data are stored in a single output directory.
- If the user specifies an output directory in their prompt, use it as
OUTPUT_DIR. - If not specified, default to
./static_analysis_semgrep_1. If that already exists, increment to_2,_3, etc.
In both cases, always create the directory with mkdir -p before writing any files.
# Resolve output directory
if [ -n "$USER_SPECIFIED_DIR" ]; then
OUTPUT_DIR="$USER_SPECIFIED_DIR"
else
BASE="static_analysis_semgrep"
N=1
while [ -e "${BASE}_${N}" ]; do
N=$((N + 1))
done
OUTPUT_DIR="${BASE}_${N}"
fi
mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_DIR/raw" "$OUTPUT_DIR/results"The output directory is resolved once at the start of Step 1 and used throughout all subsequent steps.
$OUTPUT_DIR/
├── rulesets.txt # Approved rulesets (logged after Step 3)
├── raw/ # Per-scan raw output (unfiltered)
│ ├── python-python.json
│ ├── python-python.sarif
│ ├── python-django.json
│ ├── python-django.sarif
│ └── ...
└── results/ # Final merged output
└── results.sarifPrerequisites
Required: Semgrep CLI (semgrep --version). If not installed, see Semgrep installation docs.
Optional: Semgrep Pro — enables cross-file taint tracking, inter-procedural analysis, and additional languages (Apex, C#, Elixir). Check with:
semgrep --pro --validate --config p/default 2>/dev/null && echo "Pro available" || echo "OSS only"Limitations: OSS mode cannot track data flow across files. Pro mode uses -j 1 for cross-file analysis (slower per ruleset, but parallel rulesets compensate).
Scan Modes
Select mode in Step 2 of the workflow. Mode affects both scanner flags and post-processing.
| Mode | Coverage | Findings Reported |
| Run all | All rulesets, all severity levels | Everything |
| Important only | All rulesets, pre- and post-filtered | Security vulns only, medium-high confidence/impact |
Important only applies two filter layers:
- Pre-filter:
--severity MEDIUM --severity HIGH --severity CRITICAL(CLI flag) - Post-filter: JSON metadata — keeps only
category=security,confidence∈{MEDIUM,HIGH},impact∈{MEDIUM,HIGH}
See scan-modes.md for metadata criteria and jq filter commands.
Orchestration Architecture
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MAIN AGENT (this skill) │
│ Step 1: Detect languages + check Pro availability │
│ Step 2: Select scan mode + rulesets (ref: rulesets.md) │
│ Step 3: Present plan + rulesets, get approval [⛔ HARD GATE] │
│ Step 4: Run one scan per language/category (parallel if the │
│ host supports subagent delegation, else sequential) │
│ Step 5: Merge results and report │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ Step 4
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Per-language │
│ scan │
├─────────────────┤
│ Python scanner │
│ JS/TS scanner │
│ Go scanner │
│ Docker scanner │
└─────────────────┘Workflow
Follow the detailed workflow in scan-workflow.md. Summary:
| Step | Action | Gate | Key Reference |
| 1 | Resolve output dir, detect languages + Pro availability | — | Use Glob, not Bash |
| 2 | Select scan mode + rulesets | — | rulesets.md |
| 3 | Present plan, get explicit approval | ⛔ HARD | Ask the user directly, or via the host's structured question tool if it has one |
| 4 | Run one scan per language/category | — | scanner-task-prompt.md — a prompt template for hosts that delegate to subagents; run the same steps directly otherwise |
| 5 | Merge results and report | — | Merge script (below) |
Enforcement: Track the 5 steps as a dependency chain (each blocks the next), using the host's task-tracking tool if one is available. Step 3 is a HARD GATE — do not proceed to Step 4 until the user has explicitly approved the plan.
Merge command (Step 5):
uv run scripts/merge_sarif.py $OUTPUT_DIR/raw $OUTPUT_DIR/results/results.sarifRationalizations to Reject
| Shortcut | Why It's Wrong |
| "User asked for scan, that's approval" | Original request ≠ plan approval. Present plan, use AskUserQuestion, await explicit "yes" |
| "Step 3 task is blocking, just mark complete" | Lying about task status defeats enforcement. Only mark complete after real approval |
| "I already know what they want" | Assumptions cause scanning wrong directories/rulesets. Present plan for verification |
| "Just use default rulesets" | User must see and approve exact rulesets before scan |
| "Add extra rulesets without asking" | Modifying approved list without consent breaks trust |
| "Third-party rulesets are optional" | Trail of Bits, 0xdea, Decurity catch vulnerabilities not in official registry — REQUIRED |
| "Use --config auto" | Sends metrics; less control over rulesets |
| "One scan at a time when parallel is possible" | Defeats the performance advantage; run all per-language scans concurrently when the host supports it |
| "Pro is too slow, skip --pro" | Cross-file analysis catches 250% more true positives; worth the time |
| "Semgrep handles GitHub URLs natively" | URL handling fails on repos with non-standard YAML; always clone first |
| "Cleanup is optional" | Cloned repos pollute the user's workspace and accumulate across runs |
"Use . or relative path as target" | Parallel/delegated scans need absolute paths to avoid ambiguity |
| "Let the user pick an output dir later" | Output directory must be resolved at Step 1, before any files are created |
Reference Index
| File | Content |
| rulesets.md | Complete ruleset catalog and selection algorithm |
| scan-modes.md | Pre/post-filter criteria and jq commands |
| scanner-task-prompt.md | Prompt template for delegating a per-language scan to a subagent |
| Workflow | Purpose |
| scan-workflow.md | Complete 5-step scan execution process |
Success Criteria
- Output directory resolved (user-specified or auto-incremented default)
- All generated files stored inside
$OUTPUT_DIR - Languages detected with file counts; Pro status checked
- Scan mode selected by user (run all / important only)
- Rulesets include third-party rules for all detected languages
- User explicitly approved the scan plan (Step 3 gate passed)
- All per-language scans launched concurrently (or sequentially if the host has no delegation) and completed
- Every
semgrepcommand used--metrics=off - Approved rulesets logged to
$OUTPUT_DIR/rulesets.txt - Raw per-scan outputs stored in
$OUTPUT_DIR/raw/ results.sarifexists in$OUTPUT_DIR/results/and is valid JSON- Important-only mode: post-filter applied before merge; unfiltered results preserved in
raw/ - Results summary reported with severity and category breakdown
- Cloned repos (if any) cleaned up from
$OUTPUT_DIR/repos/
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 5
- romaintoso78/claude-skills★ 180% same
- davidanthonyn/claude-skills★ 080% same
- Getampz/Skills★ 080% same
- matheus-rib1108/meu-kit-claude-code★ 042% same
- TheWatcher01/skills★ 080% same
Wrote their own version · 6
- jmylchreest/aide★ 19same name
- Nox-Lumen-tech/combo-skills★ 4same name
- allanninal/claude-code-skills★ 1same name
- umutbasal/ai★ 1same name
- conjure-3301/skills★ 0same name
- Samueladewole/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use xlsx and docx.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillxlsx
Comprehensive spreadsheet creation, editing, and analysis with support for formulas, formatting, data analysis, and visualization. When Claude needs to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv, etc) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Reading or analyzing data, (3) Modify existing spreadsheets while preserving formulas, (4) Data analysis and visualization in spreadsheets, or (5) Recalculating formulas
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkilldocx
Comprehensive document creation, editing, and analysis with support for tracked changes, comments, formatting preservation, and text extraction. When Claude needs to work with professional documents (.docx files) for: (1) Creating new documents, (2) Modifying or editing content, (3) Working with tracked changes, (4) Adding comments, or any other document tasks
Also in 3 projects that use this
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- agentic-actions-auditorSkill
- agents-md-improverSkill
- agents-md-reviseSkill
- ai-slopSkill
- code-architectSkill
- code-explorerSkill
- codeqlSkill
- code-qualitySkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- design-patternsSkill
- differential-reviewSkill
- feature-devSkill
- fp-checkSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- hf-cliSkill
- hf-cloud-aws-context-discoverySkill
- hf-cloud-python-env-setupSkill
- hf-cloud-sagemaker-deployment-plannerSkill
- hf-cloud-sagemaker-iam-preflightSkill
- hf-cloud-sagemaker-production-defaultsSkill
- hf-cloud-serving-image-selectionSkill
- hf-memSkill
- huggingface-bestSkill
- huggingface-community-evalsSkill
- huggingface-datasetsSkill
- huggingface-gradioSkill
- huggingface-llm-trainerSkill
- huggingface-local-modelsSkill
- huggingface-lora-space-builderSkill
- huggingface-paper-publisherSkill
- huggingface-papersSkill
- huggingface-spacesSkill
- huggingface-tool-builderSkill
- huggingface-trackioSkill
- huggingface-vision-trainerSkill
- huggingface-zerogpuSkill
- humanizerSkill
- insecure-defaultsSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- paper-summarizerSkill
- sarif-parsingSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- security-threat-modelSkill
- semgrep-rule-creatorSkill
- semgrep-rule-variant-creatorSkill
- sharp-edgesSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- supply-chain-risk-auditorSkill
- train-sentence-transformersSkill
- transformers-jsSkill
- trl-trainingSkill
- variant-analysisSkill
- vuln-reportSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

