web-accessibility-audit
Skill825 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Audit web applications for WCAG accessibility compliance. Use when asked to run accessibility checks, identify common violations, and provide remediation guidance.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- grupoplustech/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- ai-moto/web-craft-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 23, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- davidanthonyn/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- ai-moto/web-craft-skills★ 0same name
- grupoplustech/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- analysis-artifactsSkill
- ci-fixSkill
- create-pull-requestSkill
- dbt-model-indexSkill
- docs-updateSkill
- github-bug-report-triageSkill
- github-issue-dedupeSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- schedulerSkill
- seo-aeo-auditSkill
- slack-qa-investigateSkill
- terraform-style-checkSkill
- webapp-testingSkill
- web-performance-auditSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 66
No lang attribute on <html>
- Very specific: line 119
Use grep patterns from references/grep-patterns.md to search for:
- Distinctive: line 478
Always test with actual assistive technology when possible
- Distinctive: line 480
Document deliberate accessibility decisions
- Distinctive: line 481
Test on multiple browsers and devices
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Accessibility Auditor
Audit web applications for WCAG 2.0/2.1/2.2 compliance by identifying common violations and providing actionable remediation steps.
When to Use
- User requests accessibility audit, a11y check, or WCAG compliance review
- User mentions accessibility issues, screen readers, or keyboard navigation problems
- User asks to check or improve accessibility for people with disabilities
WCAG Principles: POUR
| Principle | Description |
| Perceivable | Content can be perceived through different senses |
| Operable | Interface can be operated by all users |
| Understandable | Content and interface are understandable |
| Robust | Content works with assistive technologies |
Conformance Levels
| Level | Requirement | Target |
| A | Minimum accessibility | Must pass |
| AA | Standard compliance | Should pass (legal requirement in many jurisdictions) |
| AAA | Enhanced accessibility | Nice to have |
12 Most Common WCAG Violations
Based on WebAIM Million (2021) research analyzing top 1M websites:
- Low Color Contrast (WCAG 1.4.3) - 86.4% of sites
- Text < 4.5:1 contrast ratio
- Large text < 3:1 contrast ratio
- UI components < 3:1
- Missing/Inadequate Alt Text (WCAG 1.1.1) - 60.6% of sites
- Images without alt attribute
- Alt text with "image", "picture", "photo"
- Empty alt on meaningful images
- Missing Name, Role, or Value (WCAG 4.1.2)
- Interactive elements without accessible names
- Custom components without proper ARIA
- Buttons, form fields, custom widgets
- Keyboard Navigation Failures (WCAG 2.1.1)
- Elements with onClick but not keyboard accessible
- Missing focus indicators
- Trapped keyboard focus
- Unlabeled Form Controls (WCAG 1.3.1, 3.3.2) - 39.6% of sites
- Inputs without
<label>or aria-label - Labels not programmatically associated
- Inputs without
- Missing Language Attributes (WCAG 3.1.1) - 28.9% of sites
- No lang attribute on
<html> - Missing lang for foreign language passages
- No lang attribute on
- Improper Heading Structure (WCAG 1.3.1, 2.4.6)
- Skipped heading levels (h1 → h3)
- Multiple h1s or no h1
- Empty headings
- Empty Links or Poor Link Text (WCAG 2.4.4)
- Links with "click here", "here", "read more"
- Empty links or links with only icons
- Missing/Improper Focus Indicators (WCAG 2.4.7)
- CSS removing outline without replacement
- Insufficient focus indicator contrast
- Overuse/Misuse of ARIA (WCAG 4.1.2)
- Unnecessary ARIA when native HTML works
- Invalid ARIA attributes for roles
- Required ARIA attributes missing
- Inadequate Data Table Markup (WCAG 1.3.1)
- Tables without
<th>elements - Missing scope or headers attributes
- Tables without
- Missing Media Captions (WCAG 1.2.1, 1.2.2)
- Videos without captions/subtitles
- Audio without transcripts
Audit Process
Phase 1: Automated Testing
Run ESLint (React/JSX projects):
npx eslint --ext .jsx,.tsx --no-ignore --format json . > .claude/skills/a11y-auditor/eslint-results.json 2>&1 || trueOr use helper script: .claude/skills/a11y-auditor/scripts/run-eslint.sh
Run Lighthouse (production/staging):
npx lighthouse https://example.com --only-categories=accessibility --output=json --output-path=./lighthouse-results.jsonCheck for axe-core integration:
grep -r "@axe-core\|axe-core" package.jsonPhase 2: Manual Code Inspection
Use grep patterns from references/grep-patterns.md to search for:
- Missing alt text
- Keyboard navigation issues
- Color values for contrast checking
- ARIA issues
- Form labels
- Heading structure
- Language attributes
- Poor link text
- Media elements
See references/grep-patterns.md for complete pattern list.
Phase 3: Analyze & Prioritize
Group findings by severity using WCAG impact levels:
Critical (fix immediately):
- Keyboard traps
- No focus indicators
- Missing form labels
- Missing alt text on functional images
- Insufficient color contrast on interactive elements
Serious (fix before launch):
- Missing page language
- Improper heading structure
- Non-descriptive link text
- Missing skip links
- Auto-playing media
Moderate (fix soon):
- Missing ARIA labels on icons
- Inconsistent navigation
- Missing error identification
- Missing landmark regions
Phase 4: Manual Testing
Follow references/screen-reader-guide.md for:
- Keyboard navigation testing
- Screen reader testing (VoiceOver, NVDA, JAWS)
- Zoom and reflow testing
- High contrast mode testing
- Reduced motion testing
WCAG Pattern Examples
Perceivable
Alt Text (1.1.1)
<!-- ❌ Missing alt -->
<img src="chart.png">
<!-- ✅ Descriptive alt -->
<img src="chart.png" alt="Bar chart showing 40% increase in Q3 sales">
<!-- ✅ Decorative (empty alt) -->
<img src="decorative-border.png" alt="" role="presentation">Color Contrast (1.4.3)
/* ❌ Low contrast (2.5:1) */
.low-contrast {
color: #999;
background: #fff;
}
/* ✅ Sufficient contrast (7:1) */
.high-contrast {
color: #333;
background: #fff;
}Contrast requirements:
- Normal text: 4.5:1 (AA), 7:1 (AAA)
- Large text (18px+ or 14px+ bold): 3:1 (AA), 4.5:1 (AAA)
- UI components: 3:1
Media Alternatives (1.2)
<video controls>
<source src="video.mp4" type="video/mp4">
<track kind="captions" src="captions.vtt" srclang="en" label="English" default>
</video>Operable
Keyboard Navigation (2.1.1)
// ❌ Only click
element.addEventListener('click', handleAction);
// ✅ Click + keyboard
element.addEventListener('click', handleAction);
element.addEventListener('keydown', (e) => {
if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') {
e.preventDefault();
handleAction();
}
});Focus Visible (2.4.7)
/* ❌ Never remove focus */
*:focus { outline: none; }
/* ✅ Keyboard-only focus */
:focus-visible {
outline: 2px solid #005fcc;
outline-offset: 2px;
}Skip Links (2.4.1)
<body>
<a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
<header><!-- navigation --></header>
<main id="main-content" tabindex="-1">
<!-- content -->
</main>
</body>.skip-link {
position: absolute;
top: -40px;
left: 0;
background: #000;
color: #fff;
padding: 8px 16px;
z-index: 100;
}
.skip-link:focus {
top: 0;
}Reduced Motion (2.3.3)
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
*,
*::before,
*::after {
animation-duration: 0.01ms !important;
animation-iteration-count: 1 !important;
transition-duration: 0.01ms !important;
scroll-behavior: auto !important;
}
}Understandable
Page Language (3.1.1)
<!-- ❌ No language -->
<html>
<!-- ✅ Language specified -->
<html lang="en">
<!-- ✅ Language changes -->
<p>The French word for hello is <span lang="fr">bonjour</span>.</p>Form Labels (3.3.2)
<!-- ❌ No label -->
<input type="email" placeholder="Email">
<!-- ✅ Explicit label -->
<label for="email">Email address</label>
<input type="email" id="email" autocomplete="email">
<!-- ✅ With hint -->
<label for="password">Password</label>
<input type="password" id="password" aria-describedby="password-requirements">
<p id="password-requirements">
Must be at least 8 characters with one number.
</p>Error Handling (3.3.1)
<label for="email">Email</label>
<input type="email" id="email"
aria-invalid="true"
aria-describedby="email-error">
<p id="email-error" role="alert">
Please enter a valid email address.
</p>Robust
ARIA Usage (4.1.2)
<!-- ❌ Unnecessary ARIA -->
<button role="button">Submit</button>
<!-- ✅ Native HTML -->
<button>Submit</button>
<!-- ✅ ARIA when needed (custom tabs) -->
<div role="tablist" aria-label="Product information">
<button role="tab" aria-selected="true" aria-controls="panel-1">
Description
</button>
<button role="tab" aria-selected="false" aria-controls="panel-2" tabindex="-1">
Reviews
</button>
</div>
<div role="tabpanel" id="panel-1" aria-labelledby="tab-1">
<!-- content -->
</div>Live Regions (4.1.3)
<!-- Polite (waits for pause) -->
<div aria-live="polite" aria-atomic="true">
Status update
</div>
<!-- Assertive (interrupts) -->
<div role="alert" aria-live="assertive">
Error: Form submission failed
</div>Visually Hidden Text
.visually-hidden {
position: absolute;
width: 1px;
height: 1px;
padding: 0;
margin: -1px;
overflow: hidden;
clip: rect(0, 0, 0, 0);
white-space: nowrap;
border: 0;
}<button>
<svg aria-hidden="true"><!-- icon --></svg>
<span class="visually-hidden">Delete item</span>
</button>Output Format
Generate reports structured as:
# Accessibility Audit Report
## Summary
- Total Issues: X
- Critical: X | Serious: X | Moderate: X | Minor: X
- WCAG Level: A, AA, or AAA
- Automated Coverage: ~57% (manual testing required)
## Critical Issues (Fix Immediately)
### 1. [Issue Name] - WCAG X.X.X
**Severity:** Critical
**Impact:** [Who is affected and how]
**Affected:** X elements
**Locations:**
- `path/to/file.tsx:123`
- `path/to/file.tsx:456`
**Problem:**
[Brief description]
**Fix:**
```tsx
// Before
<div onClick={handleClick}>Click me</div>
// After
<button onClick={handleClick}>Click me</button>Why: [Accessibility principle]
Serious Issues
[Same format]
Moderate Issues
[Same format]
Testing Recommendations
- Manual keyboard testing (Tab, Enter, Escape)
- Screen reader testing (see references/screen-reader-guide.md)
- Automated testing setup (@axe-core/react or Lighthouse CI)
- Color contrast validation (WebAIM Contrast Checker)
Next Steps
[Prioritized action items]
---
## Tools & Resources
### Development Tools
- **eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y** - React/JSX static analysis (~37 rules)
- **axe-core DevTools** - Browser extension for runtime testing
- **Lighthouse** - Built into Chrome DevTools
### Testing Tools
- **@axe-core/react** - Runtime accessibility testing
- **@axe-core/playwright** - E2E test integration
- **pa11y** - Automated command-line testing
### Manual Testing
- **WebAIM Contrast Checker** - https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/
- **WAVE** - Browser extension for visual feedback
- **Screen readers** - NVDA (Windows), VoiceOver (macOS), JAWS
### Reference Docs
- `references/WCAG-criteria.md` - All WCAG 2.1 success criteria
- `references/ARIA-patterns.md` - Common ARIA patterns and examples
- `references/screen-reader-guide.md` - Testing commands and scenarios
- `references/grep-patterns.md` - Search patterns for code audits
### References
- [WebAIM Million](https://webaim.org/projects/million/) - Annual analysis of top 1M websites (violation statistics)
- [WCAG 2.1 Quick Reference](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/quickref/) - Interactive WCAG guide
- [WAI-ARIA Authoring Practices](https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/apg/) - Official ARIA patterns
- [Deque axe Rules](https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe/) - All axe-core rules explained
- [jsx-a11y Rules](https://github.com/jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y#supported-rules) - ESLint accessibility rules
---
## Important Notes
- Automated tools catch 30-57% of issues; manual testing required
- Pages with ARIA average 41% more errors than without
- Always test with actual assistive technology when possible
- Focus on critical issues first (keyboard, screen readers, contrast)
- Document deliberate accessibility decisions
- Test on multiple browsers and devices
- Include users with disabilities in testing when possible
## Common Pitfalls to Avoid
1. Relying solely on automated testing
2. Using ARIA when native HTML suffices
3. Removing focus indicators
4. Using positive tabindex values
5. Color as only means of conveying information
6. Keyboard traps in modals/dialogs
7. Non-descriptive link text
8. Missing or incorrect heading hierarchy
9. Unlabeled form controls
10. Missing language attributesDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

