agentleFS
warpdotdevwarpdotdev/oz-skills/.agents/skills/ci-fix/SKILL.md

ci-fix

Skill825 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Diagnose and fix GitHub Actions CI failures. Inspects workflow runs and logs, identifies root causes, implements minimal fixes, and pushes to a fix branch. Use when CI is failing, red, broken, or needs diagnosis.

  • Commits and pushes

8 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use pr-review.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    pr-review

    Verify the technical accuracy of a vscode-docs pull request against the VS Code source code in microsoft/vscode. Use when reviewing a docs PR for factual correctness: setting names, command IDs, default values, API shapes, keybindings, versioned availability, and described behavior.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Verify GitHub CLI authentication before proceeding:

    line 13
  2. Very specific:

    If not authenticated, instruct the user to run gh auth login first.

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    If working from a branch or run ID:

    line 31
  4. Distinctive:

    Prefer the smallest fix that resolves the issue.

    line 62
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep changes to the failing job/step when possible

    line 69
  6. Distinctive:

    If modifying workflow files, preserve existing permissions and avoid expanding token access

    line 70
  7. Distinctive:

    Create or update a dedicated fix branch:

    line 74
  8. Distinctive:

    If the fix branch already exists, update it:

    line 85
  9. Very specific:

    Avoid pull_request_target unless explicitly requested—it can expose secrets to untrusted code

    line 114
  10. Very specific:

    Keep workflow permissions: minimal.

    line 115
  11. Distinctive:

    After fixing, provide a brief summary:

    line 120

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

CI Fix

Diagnose CI failures and implement fixes with minimal, targeted diffs. Pushes fixes to a dedicated branch without creating PRs.

Prerequisites

Verify GitHub CLI authentication before proceeding:

gh auth status

If not authenticated, instruct the user to run gh auth login first.

Workflow

1. Locate the Failing Run

Determine the failing workflow run. If working on a PR branch:

gh pr view --json statusCheckRollup --jq '.statusCheckRollup[] | select(.conclusion == "FAILURE")'

If working from a branch or run ID:

gh run list --branch <branch> --status failure --limit 5
gh run view <run-id> --verbose

2. Extract Failure Logs

Pull logs from failed steps to identify the root cause:

gh run view <run-id> --log-failed

For deeper inspection:

gh run view <run-id> --log --job <job-id>
gh run download <run-id> -D .artifacts/<run-id>

3. Identify Root Cause

Analyze logs for common failure patterns:

  • Build/compilation errors: Missing dependencies, type errors, syntax issues
  • Test failures: Assertion failures, timeouts, flaky tests
  • Linting/formatting: Style violations, unused imports
  • Environment issues: Missing secrets, permissions, resource limits

Prefer the smallest fix that resolves the issue. Deterministic code fixes are better than workflow plumbing changes.

4. Implement the Fix

Make minimal, scoped changes matching the repository's existing style:

  • Fix only what's broken—avoid unrelated refactoring
  • Keep changes to the failing job/step when possible
  • If modifying workflow files, preserve existing permissions and avoid expanding token access

5. Push to Fix Branch

Create or update a dedicated fix branch:

git checkout -b ci-fix/<original-branch>
git add -A
git commit -m "fix: resolve CI failure in <job-name>

Co-Authored-By: Warp <agent@warp.dev>"
git push -u origin ci-fix/<original-branch>

If the fix branch already exists, update it:

git checkout ci-fix/<original-branch>
git pull origin <original-branch>
# make fixes
git commit -m "fix: <description>

Co-Authored-By: Warp <agent@warp.dev>"
git push

6. Verify the Fix

Trigger CI on the fix branch and monitor:

gh run list --branch ci-fix/<original-branch> --limit 1
gh run watch <new-run-id> --exit-status

To rerun only failed jobs:

gh run rerun <run-id> --failed

Safety Notes

  • Avoid pull_request_target unless explicitly requested—it can expose secrets to untrusted code
  • Keep workflow permissions: minimal; don't broaden access to make tests pass
  • For flaky tests, prefer deterministic fixes over blind reruns

Deliverable

After fixing, provide a brief summary:

  • Failing run: Link or ID
  • Root cause: What broke and why
  • Fix: What changed
  • Verification: New run link showing green status

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.