triage-issue-local
Skill313 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Repo-specific triage guidance for oz-for-oss. Only the categories declared overridable by the core triage-issue skill may be specialized here.
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dominikmartn/harptheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- zerx-lab/zaptheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- zerx-lab/warptheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- warpdotdev/Warptheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- warpdotdev/warptheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- black12-ag/wefttheir own version, first seen Aug 19, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use classify-changelog-pr, cross-platform-cloud-verification and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
black12-agSkillclassify-changelog-pr
Reference guidance for classifying whether an unmarked PR should appear in the changelog and under which category. Used inline by the changelog-draft skill — not dispatched as a separate agent.
Also in 4 projects that use this
black12-agSkillcross-platform-cloud-verification
Orchestrates cost-conscious cloud verification across available operating-system and architecture runners after cheaper checks pass. Use whenever a code change, bug fix, build, packaging flow, native dependency, UI behavior, filesystem behavior, or test has material cross-platform implications, even if the user only asks to verify or test the change. Consult domain verification skills for what to test; use this skill to choose and access the smallest relevant set of platforms.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +10 more from black12-ag
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- warpdotdev/Warp★ 66ksame name
- warpdotdev/warp★ 66ksame name
- zerx-lab/warp★ 2.1ksame name
- zerx-lab/zap★ 2.1ksame name
- dominikmartn/harp★ 698same name
- black12-ag/weft★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- bootstrap-issue-configSkill
- create-product-specSkill
- create-tech-specSkill
- dedupe-issue-localSkill
- dedupe-issueSkill
- evaluate-auto-implement-eligibilitySkill
- implement-issueSkill
- review-pr-localSkill
- review-spec-localSkill
- review-specSkill
- security-review-prSkill
- security-review-specSkill
- triage-issueSkill
- update-dedupeSkill
- update-pr-reviewSkill
- update-triageSkill
- verify-prSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Before asking any follow-up question, first try to answer it yourself through code inspection, documentation lookup, or web search.
- Distinctive: line 18
Ask targeted follow-up questions only for details the agent cannot derive itself and that materially improve triage confidence.
- Distinctive: line 19
Prefer issue-specific questions over generic "please share more info" requests.
- Very specific: line 33
No repo-specific owner-inference hints beyond .github/STAKEHOLDERS have been captured yet.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Repo-specific triage guidance for oz-for-oss
This file is a companion to the core triage-issue skill. It does not
redefine the triage output schema, safety rules, or follow-up-question
contract. It only specializes the override categories the core skill
marks as overridable.
Heuristics
- Distinguish observed symptoms from reporter hypotheses and proposed fixes.
- Before asking any follow-up question, first try to answer it yourself through code inspection, documentation lookup, or web search. Only ask questions that you cannot resolve on your own and that only the reporter would know.
- Ask targeted follow-up questions only for details the agent cannot derive itself and that materially improve triage confidence.
- Prefer issue-specific questions over generic "please share more info" requests.
Label taxonomy
The label taxonomy for this repository is managed in .github/issue-triage/config.json. Prefer labels from that configuration, and avoid inventing new labels unless the prompt explicitly allows it.
warp:needs-support is a configured label for issues that cannot be resolved through OSS contributions (billing inquiries, plan changes, refund requests, subscription or account management, pricing questions, payment issues). When you triage such a report, request warp:needs-support, set close_issue to true, and direct the reporter to Warp support in statements; the workflow applies the label, posts the support-escalation comment, and closes the issue. Do not use this label or close_issue for issues that can be addressed via OSS contributions.
Recurring follow-up patterns
No repo-specific follow-up patterns have been captured for this repository yet. oz-for-oss is not a terminal or desktop application, so the GPU/driver, window-manager, shell-integration, and similar runtime-environment sub-items that only make sense for those products do not belong here. The weekly update-triage loop will propose additions as maintainer overrides reveal recurring patterns that are actually specific to this repository.
Owner-inference hints
No repo-specific owner-inference hints beyond .github/STAKEHOLDERS have been captured yet.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

