dedupe-issue-local
Skill313 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Repo-specific dedupe guidance for oz-for-oss. Only the categories declared overridable by the core dedupe-issue skill may be specialized here.
6 other projects use a version of this, 6 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- dominikmartn/harpedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- zerx-lab/zapedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- zerx-lab/warpedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- warpdotdev/Warpedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- warpdotdev/warpedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- black12-ag/weftedited, first seen Aug 19, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use classify-changelog-pr, cross-platform-cloud-verification and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
black12-agSkillclassify-changelog-pr
Reference guidance for classifying whether an unmarked PR should appear in the changelog and under which category. Used inline by the changelog-draft skill — not dispatched as a separate agent.
Also in 4 projects that use this
black12-agSkillcross-platform-cloud-verification
Orchestrates cost-conscious cloud verification across available operating-system and architecture runners after cheaper checks pass. Use whenever a code change, bug fix, build, packaging flow, native dependency, UI behavior, filesystem behavior, or test has material cross-platform implications, even if the user only asks to verify or test the change. Consult domain verification skills for what to test; use this skill to choose and access the smallest relevant set of platforms.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +10 more from black12-ag
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 6
- warpdotdev/Warp★ 66k26% same
- warpdotdev/warp★ 66k26% same
- zerx-lab/warp★ 2.1k35% same
- zerx-lab/zap★ 2.1k35% same
- dominikmartn/harp★ 69826% same
- black12-ag/weft★ 226% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- bootstrap-issue-configSkill
- create-product-specSkill
- create-tech-specSkill
- dedupe-issueSkill
- evaluate-auto-implement-eligibilitySkill
- implement-issueSkill
- review-pr-localSkill
- review-spec-localSkill
- review-specSkill
- security-review-prSkill
- security-review-specSkill
- triage-issue-localSkill
- triage-issueSkill
- update-dedupeSkill
- update-pr-reviewSkill
- update-triageSkill
- verify-prSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
No known-duplicate clusters have been captured for this repository yet.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Repo-specific dedupe guidance for oz-for-oss
This file is a companion to the core dedupe-issue skill. It does not
redefine the duplicate-detection algorithm, the similarity thresholds,
or the output contract. It only specializes the override categories the
core skill marks as overridable.
Known-duplicate clusters
No known-duplicate clusters have been captured for this repository yet.
The weekly update-dedupe loop will propose additions here over time
when maintainers repeatedly close issues as duplicates of the same
canonical thread.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

