implement-specs
Skill630 starsChanged 23 days agoMITView on GitHub
Implement an approved feature from PRODUCT.md and TECH.md, keeping specs and code aligned in the same PR as implementation evolves. Use after the product and tech specs are approved and the next step is building the feature.
5 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nnguyenquangg/claude-code-spec-driven-developmenttheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- zhouycheng/skillsword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- zerx-lab/zapedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- zerx-lab/warpedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- thesammykins/skillsedited, first seen Aug 14, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- zhouycheng/skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 3
- zerx-lab/warp★ 2.1k97% same
- zerx-lab/zap★ 2.1k97% same
- thesammykins/skills★ 097% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- nnguyenquangg/claude-code-spec-driven-development★ 22same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- brandalfSkill
- check-impl-against-specSkill
- complainSkill
- councilSkill
- create-prSkill
- cross-critiqueSkill
- diagnose-ci-failuresSkill
- fix-errorsSkill
- merge-riskSkill
- migrate-to-factorySkill
- pr-walkthroughSkill
- readoutSkill
- reproduce-bug-reportSkill
- researchSkill
- resolve-merge-conflictsSkill
- respond-to-pr-comments-in-blocklistSkill
- review-prSkill
- sagaSkill
- scan-new-specsSkill
- skill-doctorSkill
- spec-driven-implementationSkill
- suggestion-boxSkill
- update-skillSkill
- validate-changes-match-specsSkill
- write-feature-docsSkill
- write-pr-descriptionSkill
- write-product-specSkill
- write-tech-specSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 12 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
12
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 12
Use this skill after the product and tech specs are approved.
- Common: line 20
Before using this skill:
- Common: line 35
Make sure you understand the expected behavior, constraints, risks, and validation plan before writing code.
- Very specific: line 52
keep behavior aligned with PRODUCT.md
- Very specific: line 53
keep architecture and sequencing aligned with TECH.md
- Common: line 54
add or update tests and verification artifacts as the work lands
- Common: line 56
Use the same PR for the specs and implementation when practical so the full feature evolution is reviewable in one place.
- Common: line 60
If implementation reveals that the intended behavior or design should change, update the checked-in specs rather than letting them go stale.
- Very specific: line 64
update PRODUCT.md when user-facing behavior, UX, edge cases, or success criteria change
- Very specific: line 65
update TECH.md when architecture, sequencing, module boundaries, or validation strategy change
- Common: line 66
keep those updates in the same PR as the corresponding code changes
- Common: line 72
Before considering the work complete, verify that the code matches the current specs.
- Common: line 81
Keep specs and code synchronized throughout implementation.
- Common: line 82
Prefer updating the spec immediately when decisions change rather than batching spec cleanup until the end.
- Common: line 83
Use optional tracking documents only when they add real value for a complex feature.
- Common: line 84
Keep the same PR coherent: spec updates, code changes, tests, and optional tracking docs should all support the same feature narrative.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
implement-specs
Implement an approved feature from PRODUCT.md and TECH.md.
Overview
Use this skill after the product and tech specs are approved. The goal is to build the feature described by the specs while keeping the checked-in specs and the implementation aligned as the work evolves.
Approved specs should live directly under a ticket-named directory in specs/, for example specs/APP-1234/PRODUCT.md and specs/APP-1234/TECH.md.
In many cases, the implementation should be pushed in the same PR as the product and tech specs. As the engineer iterates, changes to PRODUCT.md, TECH.md, and the code should all be pushed in that same PR so review stays anchored to the feature that will actually ship.
Prerequisites
Before using this skill:
- confirm that
PRODUCT.mdexists - confirm that
TECH.mdexists when the feature warranted one - confirm that the relevant specs have been reviewed and approved enough to start implementation
Workflow
1. Read the approved specs first
Treat:
PRODUCT.mdas the source of truth for user-facing behaviorTECH.mdas the source of truth for architecture, sequencing, and implementation shape
Make sure you understand the expected behavior, constraints, risks, and validation plan before writing code.
2. Offer optional implementation aids for large features
For large or long-running features, optionally offer one of these aids to the user before implementation begins:
PROJECT_LOG.mdto track checkpoints, explored paths, partial findings, and current implementation stateDECISIONS.mdto capture concrete product and technical decisions made during the PRD and tech design process
These are optional aids, not required deliverables. Offer them when they would reduce confusion or help future agents avoid re-exploring the same paths.
3. Plan and implement against the specs
Break the work into concrete implementation steps, then implement the feature against the approved specs.
During implementation:
- keep behavior aligned with
PRODUCT.md - keep architecture and sequencing aligned with
TECH.md - add or update tests and verification artifacts as the work lands
Use the same PR for the specs and implementation when practical so the full feature evolution is reviewable in one place.
4. Update specs as the implementation evolves
If implementation reveals that the intended behavior or design should change, update the checked-in specs rather than letting them go stale.
In particular:
- update
PRODUCT.mdwhen user-facing behavior, UX, edge cases, or success criteria change - update
TECH.mdwhen architecture, sequencing, module boundaries, or validation strategy change - keep those updates in the same PR as the corresponding code changes
The PR should describe the feature that actually ships, not just the initial draft of the specs.
5. Verify against the specs
Before considering the work complete, verify that the code matches the current specs.
Prefer:
- unit tests and regression coverage that follow the repository's local testing conventions
- integration or end-to-end tests for important user flows
Best Practices
- Keep specs and code synchronized throughout implementation.
- Prefer updating the spec immediately when decisions change rather than batching spec cleanup until the end.
- Use optional tracking documents only when they add real value for a complex feature.
- Keep the same PR coherent: spec updates, code changes, tests, and optional tracking docs should all support the same feature narrative.
Related Skills
spec-driven-implementationwrite-product-specwrite-tech-spec
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

