agentleFS
warpdotdevwarpdotdev/common-skills/.agents/skills/implement-specs/SKILL.md

implement-specs

Skill630 starsChanged 23 days agoMITView on GitHub

Implement an approved feature from PRODUCT.md and TECH.md, keeping specs and code aligned in the same PR as implementation evolves. Use after the product and tech specs are approved and the next step is building the feature.

5 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. 12 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 12

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Use this skill after the product and tech specs are approved.

    line 12
  2. Common:

    Before using this skill:

    line 20
  3. Common:

    Make sure you understand the expected behavior, constraints, risks, and validation plan before writing code.

    line 35
  4. Very specific:

    keep behavior aligned with PRODUCT.md

    line 52
  5. Very specific:

    keep architecture and sequencing aligned with TECH.md

    line 53
  6. Common:

    add or update tests and verification artifacts as the work lands

    line 54
  7. Common:

    Use the same PR for the specs and implementation when practical so the full feature evolution is reviewable in one place.

    line 56
  8. Common:

    If implementation reveals that the intended behavior or design should change, update the checked-in specs rather than letting them go stale.

    line 60
  9. Very specific:

    update PRODUCT.md when user-facing behavior, UX, edge cases, or success criteria change

    line 64
  10. Very specific:

    update TECH.md when architecture, sequencing, module boundaries, or validation strategy change

    line 65
  11. Common:

    keep those updates in the same PR as the corresponding code changes

    line 66
  12. Common:

    Before considering the work complete, verify that the code matches the current specs.

    line 72
  13. Common:

    Keep specs and code synchronized throughout implementation.

    line 81
  14. Common:

    Prefer updating the spec immediately when decisions change rather than batching spec cleanup until the end.

    line 82
  15. Common:

    Use optional tracking documents only when they add real value for a complex feature.

    line 83
  16. Common:

    Keep the same PR coherent: spec updates, code changes, tests, and optional tracking docs should all support the same feature narrative.

    line 84

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

implement-specs

Implement an approved feature from PRODUCT.md and TECH.md.

Overview

Use this skill after the product and tech specs are approved. The goal is to build the feature described by the specs while keeping the checked-in specs and the implementation aligned as the work evolves.

Approved specs should live directly under a ticket-named directory in specs/, for example specs/APP-1234/PRODUCT.md and specs/APP-1234/TECH.md.

In many cases, the implementation should be pushed in the same PR as the product and tech specs. As the engineer iterates, changes to PRODUCT.md, TECH.md, and the code should all be pushed in that same PR so review stays anchored to the feature that will actually ship.

Prerequisites

Before using this skill:

  • confirm that PRODUCT.md exists
  • confirm that TECH.md exists when the feature warranted one
  • confirm that the relevant specs have been reviewed and approved enough to start implementation

Workflow

1. Read the approved specs first

Treat:

  • PRODUCT.md as the source of truth for user-facing behavior
  • TECH.md as the source of truth for architecture, sequencing, and implementation shape

Make sure you understand the expected behavior, constraints, risks, and validation plan before writing code.

2. Offer optional implementation aids for large features

For large or long-running features, optionally offer one of these aids to the user before implementation begins:

  • PROJECT_LOG.md to track checkpoints, explored paths, partial findings, and current implementation state
  • DECISIONS.md to capture concrete product and technical decisions made during the PRD and tech design process

These are optional aids, not required deliverables. Offer them when they would reduce confusion or help future agents avoid re-exploring the same paths.

3. Plan and implement against the specs

Break the work into concrete implementation steps, then implement the feature against the approved specs.

During implementation:

  • keep behavior aligned with PRODUCT.md
  • keep architecture and sequencing aligned with TECH.md
  • add or update tests and verification artifacts as the work lands

Use the same PR for the specs and implementation when practical so the full feature evolution is reviewable in one place.

4. Update specs as the implementation evolves

If implementation reveals that the intended behavior or design should change, update the checked-in specs rather than letting them go stale.

In particular:

  • update PRODUCT.md when user-facing behavior, UX, edge cases, or success criteria change
  • update TECH.md when architecture, sequencing, module boundaries, or validation strategy change
  • keep those updates in the same PR as the corresponding code changes

The PR should describe the feature that actually ships, not just the initial draft of the specs.

5. Verify against the specs

Before considering the work complete, verify that the code matches the current specs.

Prefer:

  • unit tests and regression coverage that follow the repository's local testing conventions
  • integration or end-to-end tests for important user flows

Best Practices

  • Keep specs and code synchronized throughout implementation.
  • Prefer updating the spec immediately when decisions change rather than batching spec cleanup until the end.
  • Use optional tracking documents only when they add real value for a complex feature.
  • Keep the same PR coherent: spec updates, code changes, tests, and optional tracking docs should all support the same feature narrative.

Related Skills

  • spec-driven-implementation
  • write-product-spec
  • write-tech-spec

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.