agentleFS
warpdotdevwarpdotdev/common-skills/.agents/skills/diagnose-ci-failures/SKILL.md

diagnose-ci-failures

Skill630 starsChanged 25 days agoMITView on GitHub

Diagnose CI failures for a PR using the GitHub CLI, extract error logs, and generate a plan to fix them. Use when the user asks to check CI status, pull CI issues, triage test failures, or investigate PR build failures.

2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If no PR exists, inform the user and offer to create one using the create-pr skill.

    line 28
  2. Distinctive:

    If CI is still running, inform the user which checks have already failed or passed, highlight the checks that are still running, and …

    line 43
  3. Distinctive:

    Test failure messages and stack traces

    line 57
  4. Very specific:

    Create a plan document (using create_plan tool) with:

    line 71
  5. Distinctive:

    Always create a plan first: Never make code changes directly.

    line 82
  6. Distinctive:

    Unrelated test failures: If tests passed in CI but fail locally, they may be environment-specific or flaky

    line 84

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

diagnose-ci-failures

Programmatically diagnose CI failures for a PR and generate a plan to fix them.

Overview

This skill provides a deterministic workflow to check CI status for a PR, extract failure logs, analyze errors, and create a plan (not code changes) to resolve issues. The output is always a plan document that can be reviewed before execution.

Workflow

1. Verify PR exists for current branch

Get the current branch and check if a PR exists:

# Get current branch
git branch --show-current

# Check for PR
GH_PAGER=cat gh pr view <branch-name> --json number,title,url,state

If no PR exists, inform the user and offer to create one using the create-pr skill.

2. Check CI status

Fetch the status of all CI checks:

GH_PAGER=cat gh pr view <branch-name> --json statusCheckRollup

Parse the output to identify:

  • Completed checks vs. in-progress checks
  • Successful checks
  • Failed checks with their names and details URLs

If CI is still running, inform the user which checks have already failed or passed, highlight the checks that are still running, and suggest waiting for completion before diagnosis.

3. Extract failure logs

For each failed check, pull the logs using the run ID from the status check:

GH_PAGER=cat gh run view <run-id> --log-failed

Focus on extracting:

  • Error messages and their locations (file paths, line numbers)
  • Compilation errors (unused imports, type mismatches, etc.)
  • Linting/clippy errors with specific lint names
  • Test failure messages and stack traces
  • Build failures and their root causes

4. Categorize errors

Group errors by type:

  • Formatting issues: cargo fmt failures
  • Linting issues: cargo clippy warnings/errors
  • Compilation errors: Type errors, missing imports, signature mismatches
  • Test failures: Failing tests with their names and failure reasons
  • Platform-specific issues: WASM, Linux, macOS, Windows-specific failures

5. Generate fix plan

Create a plan document (using create_plan tool) with:

  • Problem Statement: Summary of failing checks
  • Current State: What errors were found and where
  • Proposed Changes: Specific fixes needed for each error category
  • Validation Steps: Commands to verify fixes (fmt, clippy, tests, presubmit)

The plan should reference the fix-errors skill for detailed guidance on resolving specific error types.

Important Notes

  • GitHub CLI paging: Set GH_PAGER=cat on every gh invocation. The GitHub CLI does not support --no-pager as a global option; GH_PAGER and PAGER are its documented paging controls
  • Always create a plan first: Never make code changes directly. Generate a plan for user review
  • Check test status in CI: Even if tests fail locally, verify they passed in CI before flagging as issues
  • Unrelated test failures: If tests passed in CI but fail locally, they may be environment-specific or flaky
  • Multiple error types: Fix one category at a time (e.g., all clippy errors before tests)
  • Cross-reference fix-errors skill: For detailed error resolution strategies, use the fix-errors skill

Common CI Check Names

  • Formatting + Clippy (MacOS)
  • Formatting + Clippy (Linux)
  • Run MacOS tests
  • Run Linux tests
  • Run Windows tests
  • Check CI results (summary check)
  • WASM build

Example Commands

Get PR status with details:

GH_PAGER=cat gh pr view --json number,title,state,statusCheckRollup

Get logs from specific failed run:

GH_PAGER=cat gh run view 12345678 --log-failed

Check for specific error in logs:

GH_PAGER=cat gh run view 12345678 --log-failed 2>&1 | grep -A 5 "error:"

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.