qa-heal
Skill2 starsChanged 46 days agoMITView on GitHub
Self-healing test suite — when the deterministic E2E/regression suite goes red, triage each failing test into a STALE/BRITTLE test (repair the selectors/waits, never the assertion) vs a REAL REGRESSION (leave it red — it's a bug). Repairs the brittle ones on a branch and opens one merge request; real regressions are filed as issues that flow into /qa-fix. Use when asked to "fix the failing tests", "heal the broken suite", "the selectors are stale", "stop the flaky tests", or "the CI suite is red". Never weakens an assertion; never merges.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 35
Find the failures: If the user already has suite output, pass it as args.failures ([{testFile, testTitle, error}]).
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
qa-heal
Tests rot: selectors drift, labels change, waits get flaky — and a red suite that's just stale gets ignored, which is how real regressions slip through. qa-heal keeps the suite honest. For each failing test it decides why it fails and acts:
suite red → per failing test, in an isolated worktree:
├─ behaviour still holds, selector/label/timing drifted → REPAIR the test (the HOW) → green
├─ behaviour is gone / assertion no longer matches the app → REAL REGRESSION → leave red → file a bug
└─ passes on retry → stabilize (proper wait, no assertion change)
repairs → one branch + one MR ("qa-heal: repair N stale tests") → you review & merge
verify → an INDEPENDENT agent confirms the diff touched ONLY selectors/waits — no assertion moved
regressions → filed as issues (via the report step) → they flow into /qa-fix🔒 The cardinal rule
Heal the HOW (selectors, locators, waits, setup) — never the WHAT (assertions). If a test can only go green by changing what it asserts, the test is right and the app changed: that's a real regression, not a stale selector. Weakening an assertion to force green would hide a real bug — qa-heal refuses to do it, and the independent Verify-heal pass exists specifically to catch any repair that touched an assertion.
Engine (invoke via the Workflow tool; do not inline)
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/qa-heal/engine/qa-heal.workflow.js
(If $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT is unset, the skill is at ~/.claude/skills/qa-heal — resolve the engine path relative to this SKILL.md.)
Prerequisites
- The same
qa.config.jsonqa-explore/qa-fix use (baseUrl,login,e2eDir,framework, and — to open the MR + file regressions — atrackerblock + its token env var). Optionalhealblock:verify(default true),maxHeal,suiteCommand. - Run from inside the target project's git repo — the healer works in a worktree and pushes a branch. Without a tracker it just leaves a local branch + diff for you.
How to run
- Resolve config. Load
qa.config.json. Confirm the token env var if atrackeris set (don't print it). - Find the failures. If the user already has suite output, pass it as
args.failures([{testFile, testTitle, error}]). Otherwise the engine's Collect phase runs the suite (heal.suiteCommandor the framework default) and lists the red tests. - Confirm before any push. Repairing tests + opening a MR is an outward action — state how many tests are red and that it will open one MR of repairs. Proceed on the user's go-ahead.
- Run the engine.
Workflow({ scriptPath: "<engine>/qa-heal.workflow.js", args: { ...config, failures? } }). It adjudicates each failure (heal vs real-regression vs flaky), repairs the brittle ones on one branch, opens one MR, and an independent agent verifies the diff is HOW-only. - File the regressions. Take the returned
regressions(real app bugs the tests caught) and file them viareport-issues.workflow.js(same as qa-explore findings) so they enter theqa::confirmed→/qa-fixloop. The suite's red tests for those bugs stay red until/qa-fixfixes the app. - Report back. Summarize: tests healed (with the MR + the exact HOW-level changes), real regressions filed (with links), flaky stabilized, and loudly flag any repair the verifier said touched an assertion — those must not be merged without a human looking.
Where it fits the loop
qa-explore finds new bugs · qa-heal keeps the existing suite trustworthy (stale ≠ broken) · qa-fix fixes the real bugs both surface. Run qa-heal whenever Step 0 is red, or on a schedule, before trusting a red suite as "regressions."
Notes
- Human merges, always. qa-heal opens the MR; you merge it. The MR shows exactly which selectors/waits moved.
- A test it can't safely adjudicate is returned
could-not-heal(not silently changed) for a human to take. - Cadence: on demand (
/qa-healwhen the suite is red). A scheduled/CI variant rides the same roadmap as the standalone runner.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

