post
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Post-implementation phase for a task run through unknowns:pre and unknowns:impl. Packages the work into a buy-in pitch doc, then generates a comprehension quiz the user must pass PERFECTLY before merge is recommended. Use after implementation is done, before opening/merging the PR, or when the user says "/unknowns:post", "pitch this", or "quiz me on the changes".
18 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- flung-official/flung-claude-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dcbruck/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- Lzdevmendes/motion-studiotheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- ayrshare/ayrshare-social-media-api-claude-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Suge8/friedbuntheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- devinat1/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 6, 2026
Other versions18 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 18
- danium/lateral-thinking★ 311same name
- N1arko/redaktura-skills★ 130same name
- analystacademy/claude-skills★ 35same name
- ayrshare/ayrshare-social-media-api-claude-plugin★ 19same name
- imMamdouhaboammar/linkedin-animated-infographics★ 14same name
- Suge8/friedbun★ 12same name
- Epistates/sparX★ 3same name
- robertnowell/marketing-pipeline★ 2same name
- dcbruck/claude-skills★ 1same name
- devinat1/skills★ 1same name
8 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Write 09-pitch.md, then generate 09-pitch.html per ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/pre/references/design-system.md (§ 09-pitch.html).
- Very specific: line 44
Write 5–8 questions that test understanding, not memory: "what happens if X fails?", "why option A over B?", "which existing code path …
- Very specific: line 45
Write 10-quiz.md (report + questions + answer key at the bottom under ## Answer key) and generate 10-quiz.html per …
- Very specific: line 51
Update ledger (Quiz score, Route status → complete if passed), regenerate index.html (quiz gauge green, MERGE-READY banner).
- Distinctive: line 57
Not yet passed (user stops early):
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
unknowns:post — pitch, then prove you understand it
Two jobs: (1) get reviewers to buy in fast — they start with the same unknowns the author did; (2) make sure the ORCHESTRATOR actually understands what was built — a diff skim is not understanding, because behavior depends on existing code paths.
Step 0 — Locate state
Same resolution as unknowns:impl Step 1. Missing 08-notes.md is fine (zero deviations); missing directory entirely → offer to run in degraded mode on the current branch diff (create dir + minimal ledger first).
Step 1 — Pitch
Write 09-pitch.md, then generate 09-pitch.html per ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/pre/references/design-system.md (§ 09-pitch.html).
# Pitch: <task>
## Result
<demo first: what exists now, how to see it — screenshot/GIF pointer, URL, command>
## Problem
<2-3 sentences>
## Approach
<3-5 bullets, each tied to a ledger decision #>
## Unknowns we accounted for
| Reviewer would ask | We resolved it | Evidence |
<rows from resolved ledger entries a reviewer would have anticipated>
## Deviations from plan
<from 08-notes.md, honest, with why — or "none">
## Artifacts
ledger.md · 06-plan.md · 07-preview.html · 08-notes.md · index.htmlStep 2 — Quiz (merge gate)
- Build the change report: context, intuition, what was done and why, touched code paths — reading the ACTUAL final code, not just the diff (behavior depends on existing paths the diff doesn't show).
- Write 5–8 questions that test understanding, not memory: "what happens if X fails?", "why option A over B?", "which existing code path handles Y now?". Mix multiple-choice and short-answer. Cover every deviation from
08-notes.md. - Write
10-quiz.md(report + questions + answer key at the bottom under## Answer key) and generate10-quiz.htmlper${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/pre/references/design-system.md(§10-quiz.html— interactive, client-side scoring). - Quiz the user IN CHAT, one question at a time (AskUserQuestion for multiple-choice). Grade against the key.
- Gate: perfect score required. Miss any → explain the missed area from the artifacts, then re-quiz ONLY the missed questions (rephrased). Repeat until perfect. Record final score + attempts in
10-quiz.mdand the ledger.
Step 3 — Exit handoff (MANDATORY)
Update ledger (Quiz score, Route status → complete if passed), regenerate index.html (quiz gauge green, MERGE-READY banner).
- Passed:
Quiz passed {score} (attempt {n}) — MERGE-READY. Pitch:
09-pitch.html— drop it in Slack / the PR description. Next: open the PR / merge. Optionally archivedocs/unknowns-resolver/<slug>/in the repo as decision history.
- Not yet passed (user stops early):
Not merge-ready: {missed} area(s) unclear. Gaps:
<list>. Re-run/unknowns:postto resume the quiz.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

