vk-fix-hard
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
⚡⚡⚡ Use subagents to plan and fix hard issues
In this repository77 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- archifySkill
- banner-designSkill
- brandSkill
- chrome-devtoolsSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- computer-useSkill
- context-engine-debuggingSkill
- context-engine-exploringSkill
- context-engine-guideSkill
- context-engine-syncSkill
- debuggingSkill
- designSkill
- design-systemSkill
- docs-seekerSkill
- docxSkill
- pdfSkill
- pptxSkill
- xlsxSkill
- kubernetesSkill
- planningSkill
- playwrightSkill
- repomixSkill
- researchSkill
- slidesSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- vk-askSkill
- vk-bootstrap-autoSkill
- vk-brainstormSkill
- vk-cloneSkill
- vk-contentSkill
- vk-cook-routerSkill
- vk-cookSkill
- vk-debugSkill
- vk-design-from-visualSkill
- vk-designSkill
- vk-docsSkill
- vk-docs-summarizeSkill
- vk-fix-fastSkill
- vk-fixSkill
- vk-fix-sourceSkill
- vk-fix-typesSkill
- vk-fix-uiSkill
- vk-git-cmSkill
- vk-git-cpSkill
- vk-git-mergeSkill
- vk-git-prSkill
- vk-git-tagSkill
- vk-goalSkill
- vk-helpSkill
- vk-hoh-devSkill
- vk-hoh-planSkill
- vk-hoh-qaSkill
- vk-hoh-runSkill
- vk-integrate-polarSkill
- vk-integrate-sepaySkill
- vk-journalSkill
- vk-learnSkill
- vk-plan-archiveSkill
- vk-plan-fastSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 26
Use tester subagent to write test cases and run the tests, make sure it works, then report back to main agent.
- Very specific: line 27
If there are issues or failed tests, use debugger subagent to find the root cause of the issues, then ask main agent to fix all of them.
- Very specific: line 29
After finishing, delegate to code-reviewer subagent to review code.
- Distinctive: line 30
If there are critical issues, ask main agent to improve the code and test everything again.
- Very specific: line 35
Follow workflows/fix-report-contract.md — post-approval project-manager + docs-manager parallel wave, rejection path, Final Report, asset …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Fix Hard
Ultrathink to plan & start fixing these issues follow the Orchestration Protocol, Core Responsibilities, Subagents Team and Development Rules:
<issues>$ARGUMENTS</issues>
Workflow
For video/screenshot input handling, see workflows/visual-input.md.
Break complex problems into sequential thought steps and state each hypothesis before testing it. Analyze the skills catalog and activate other skills that are needed for the task during the process.
- Parallel wave (per
workflows/parallel-execution.md):debugger(root cause) +researcher(online lookup of the reported issue, if needed) run concurrently — researcher doesn't need debugger's output, only<issues>. Both report back to main agent. plannercreates an implementation plan from BOTH reports (needs both → serial after the wave).- Then use general agent (main agent) to implement the plan step by step.
- Use
testersubagent to write test cases and run the tests, make sure it works, then report back to main agent. - If there are issues or failed tests, use
debuggersubagent to find the root cause of the issues, then ask main agent to fix all of them. - Repeat until all tests pass. Loop bound: after 3 fix→retest cycles still failing, STOP — the architecture/approach is likely wrong, not just the hypothesis. Re-question the design with
debuggerbefore any 4th attempt; never loop indefinitely. - After finishing, delegate to
code-reviewersubagent to review code. If there are critical issues, ask main agent to improve the code and test everything again. Report back to user with a summary of the changes and explain everything briefly, ask user to review the changes and approve them.
Closing
- Follow
workflows/fix-report-contract.md— post-approvalproject-manager+docs-managerparallel wave, rejection path, Final Report, asset rules. Do not restate it here.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

