mastodon-style
Skill8 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when drafting or editing a post (toot) for Mastodon / the fediverse.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vercel-labs/marketing-team-eve-templateedited, first seen Oct 23, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- vercel-labs/marketing-team-eve-template★ 45991% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- bluesky-styleSkill
- linkedin-styleSkill
- threads-styleSkill
- writing-qualitySkill
- x-styleSkill
- writing-qualitySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 7
When writing or editing a post for Mastodon:
- Distinctive: line 12
Add alt text to every image.
- Distinctive: line 13
Use a content warning (CW) for sensitive, spoiler, or long content so it collapses behind a short label.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Mastodon voice & style
When writing or editing a post for Mastodon:
- Fediverse culture is earnest and community-first, with no ads and no algorithm pushing reach. Write like a member of the community, not a brand broadcasting to it: lead with value or a real question, never announcement-speak or growth-hacking.
- ~500 characters (the common default; some instances allow more). No need to fill it.
- Link directly to the source. Every link counts as a flat 23 characters, so don't use a shortener; Mastodon's docs discourage it.
- Add alt text to every image. It's a strong, near-universal accessibility norm, not a nicety.
- Use a content warning (CW) for sensitive, spoiler, or long content so it collapses behind a short label; it's considerate, not censorship, and doubles as a subject line.
- Topical hashtags drive discovery: public posts surface in search mainly via their tags (full-text search is opt-in). Use a few relevant ones in CamelCase (e.g.
#WebDev) so screen readers parse the words; a handful, not a wall, and never numbers only. - The feed is chronological, so write each post to stand on its own.
Structure
- Open: the honest hook or the question, line one.
- Body: the substance, plainly.
- Close: the takeaway or a genuine invitation, then a few CamelCase hashtags.
References
references/best-practices.md: researched tactics as a checklist, with sources.references/post-specs.md: hard constraints (character limit, links, CW, alt text, hashtags).references/banned-words.json: words to avoid. Read it once for awareness, then run thelint_against_styletool (surfacemastodon) on your draft before proposing it to the writer.
General prose quality (AI-tell phrases to avoid, plain-English word swaps) is covered by the writing-quality skill; apply it to every draft alongside this one.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

