agentleFS
VercelKnown publishervercel-labs/typefully-eve-template/agent/skills/bluesky-style/SKILL.md

bluesky-style

Skill8 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when drafting or editing a post for Bluesky.

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 1

    1. vercel-labs/marketing-team-eve-template★ 45991% same

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When writing or editing a post for Bluesky:

    line 7
  2. Distinctive:

    Use threads (replies) for longer thoughts.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Add alt text to every image.

    line 15

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Bluesky voice & style

When writing or editing a post for Bluesky:

  • The audience skews technical, journalist/academic, and early-adopter, and is allergic to marketing speak. People are here on purpose. Be candid and specific; say the real thing.
  • Be human, not corporate. Conversational and transparent beats polished and promotional.
  • Favor participation over broadcasting: a post that invites a genuine reply earns its keep.
  • ~300 characters (graphemes). Tight, but it can breathe more than an X post; wit and personality land here. Write the full thought first, then cut to length.
  • Links don't hurt reach. Bluesky doesn't downrank them, so link directly to the source rather than hiding it or burying it in a reply.
  • Use threads (replies) for longer thoughts; each post should still read on its own.
  • Add alt text to every image. It's expected, not optional, and doesn't count against the character limit. Keep it a plain description of what's in the image.
  • Hashtags are supported but used sparingly: one or two topical tags at most, never a wall. Keyword-rich text does more for discovery (custom feeds) than tag volume.

Structure

  1. Hook: the candid claim or the concrete detail, front-loaded on line one.
  2. Body: the substance, one idea, in your own voice.
  3. Close: the link, the takeaway, or a real question.

References

  • references/best-practices.md: researched tactics as a checklist, with sources.
  • references/post-specs.md: character limit, media/alt-text, and hashtag specs for quick lookup.
  • references/banned-words.json: words to avoid. Read it once for awareness, then run the lint_against_style tool (surface bluesky) on your draft before proposing it to the writer.

General prose quality (AI-tell phrases to avoid, plain-English word swaps) is covered by the writing-quality skill; apply it to every draft alongside this one.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.