gitnexus-impact-analysis
Skill1 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user wants to know what will break if they change something, or needs safety analysis before editing code. Examples: \"Is it safe to change X?\", \"What depends on this?\", \"What will break?\"
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 2 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
2
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 14
Before making non-trivial code changes
- Common: line 15
Before committing — to understand what your changes affect
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Impact Analysis with GitNexus
When to Use
- "Is it safe to change this function?"
- "What will break if I modify X?"
- "Show me the blast radius"
- "Who uses this code?"
- Before making non-trivial code changes
- Before committing — to understand what your changes affect
Workflow
1. impact({target: "X", direction: "upstream"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact "X" --direction upstream --repo .`
2. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/processes → Check affected execution flows
3. detect_changes({scope: "all"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs detect-changes --scope all --repo .`
4. Assess risk and report to userIf "Index is stale" → run
node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyzein terminal. If.gitnexus/run.cjsis missing, replacenode .gitnexus/run.cjswithnpx gitnexusin the fallback commands.
Checklist
- [ ] impact({target, direction: "upstream"}) or CLI fallback to find dependents
- [ ] Review d=1 items first (these WILL BREAK)
- [ ] Check high-confidence (>0.8) dependencies
- [ ] READ processes to check affected execution flows
- [ ] detect_changes({scope: "all"}) or CLI fallback for pre-commit check
- [ ] Assess risk level and report to userUnderstanding Output
| Depth | Risk Level | Meaning |
| d=1 | WILL BREAK | Direct callers/importers |
| d=2 | LIKELY AFFECTED | Indirect dependencies |
| d=3 | MAY NEED TESTING | Transitive effects |
Risk Assessment
| Affected | Risk |
| <5 symbols, few processes | LOW |
| 5-15 symbols, 2-5 processes | MEDIUM |
| >15 symbols or many processes | HIGH |
| Critical path (auth, payments) | CRITICAL |
| Zero callers found | UNKNOWN |
UNKNOWN is not a low rung on this scale — it means the walk could not answer.
An empty caller set is equally consistent with "genuinely unused" and "the
callers are not resolvable by the index" (plain-object property access, dynamic
dispatch, cross-language calls), so few-callers ⇒ LOW does not apply. The
result carries a riskNote saying so. Confirm with a text search before
treating the symbol as safe to change or delete.
Tools
impact — the primary tool for symbol blast radius. If MCP is unavailable, use node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact <symbol> --direction upstream --repo . instead:
impact({
target: "validateUser",
direction: "upstream",
minConfidence: 0.8,
maxDepth: 3
})
→ d=1 (WILL BREAK):
- loginHandler (src/auth/login.ts:42) [CALLS, 100%]
- apiMiddleware (src/api/middleware.ts:15) [CALLS, 100%]
→ d=2 (LIKELY AFFECTED):
- authRouter (src/routes/auth.ts:22) [CALLS, 95%]detect_changes — git-diff based impact analysis. If MCP is unavailable, use node .gitnexus/run.cjs detect-changes --scope all --repo . instead:
detect_changes({scope: "all"})
→ Changed: 5 symbols in 3 files
→ Affected: LoginFlow, TokenRefresh, APIMiddlewarePipeline
→ Risk: MEDIUMpartial: true (a graph query failed) or truncated: true (the changed-symbol
listing was capped) means the result is short of the truth, and reads like
UNKNOWN above: a zero there means unseen, not unaffected. Re-run it rather
than tick the pre-commit check.
Example: "What breaks if I change validateUser?"
1. impact({target: "validateUser", direction: "upstream"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact "validateUser" --direction upstream --repo .`
→ d=1: loginHandler, apiMiddleware (WILL BREAK)
→ d=2: authRouter, sessionManager (LIKELY AFFECTED)
2. READ gitnexus://repo/my-app/processes
→ LoginFlow and TokenRefresh touch validateUser
3. Risk: 2 direct callers, 2 processes = MEDIUMOther versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 10
- abhigyanpatwari/GitNexus★ 48k48% same
- doobidoo/mcp-memory-service★ 2.1k70% same
- ucsandman/DashClaw★ 31049% same
- kunwarVivek/mcp-github-project-manager★ 10449% same
- haoxiang-xu/PuPu★ 3655% same
- pandich93/youtube-niche-finder★ 2349% same
- metagit-ai/metagit-cli★ 449% same
- MarkChu-git/typesafe-mcp★ 255% same
- AlexHercules/skills★ 075% same
- ErrorNotFound808/claude-skills★ 084% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository115 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/backend.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/commit.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/database.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/debug.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/design.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/dev-workflow.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/frontend.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/i18n-arb.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/i18n-guide.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/infrastructure.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/market.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/mobile.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/quality.mdcCursor rule
- beadsSkill
- gitnexus-area-adaptersSkill
- gitnexus-area-cliSkill
- gitnexus-area-contextSkill
- gitnexus-area-dashboardSkill
- gitnexus-area-detectorsSkill
- gitnexus-area-engineSkill
- gitnexus-area-enrichmentSkill
- gitnexus-area-hooksSkill
- gitnexus-area-installerSkill
- gitnexus-area-integrationSkill
- gitnexus-area-lintSkill
- gitnexus-area-payloadsSkill
- gitnexus-area-project-indexSkill
- gitnexus-area-resourcesSkill
- gitnexus-area-rules-2Skill
- gitnexus-area-rulesSkill
- gitnexus-area-scriptsSkill
- gitnexus-area-test-smellsSkill
- gitnexus-area-testsSkill
- gitnexus-area-uiSkill
- gitnexus-cliSkill
- gitnexus-debuggingSkill
- gitnexus-exploringSkill
- gitnexus-guideSkill
- gitnexus-refactoringSkill
- impeccableSkill
- oma-academic-writingSkill
- oma-architectureSkill
- oma-backendSkill
- oma-brainstormSkill
- oma-coordinationSkill
- oma-dbSkill
- oma-debugSkill
- oma-deepsecSkill
- oma-designSkill
- oma-dev-workflowSkill
- oma-docsSkill
- oma-explanationSkill
- oma-frontendSkill
- oma-hwpSkill
- oma-imageSkill
- oma-marketSkill
- oma-mobileSkill
- oma-observabilitySkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

