agentleFS
varunk130varunk130/claude-code-skills/skills/strategic-management/porters-five-forces-analyzer/SKILL.md

porters-five-forces-analyzer

Skill1 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub

Performs a rigorous Porter's Five Forces analysis: industry structure, supplier power, buyer power, threat of new entrants, substitutes, and rivalry intensity, with quantified pressure scoring and a strategic-positioning recommendation. Use when entering a new market, defending an existing position, evaluating an industry's structural attractiveness, advising on Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) in a new vertical, or preparing a competitive strategy memo.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Treat the Five Forces as a static one-time exercise

    line 155
  2. Distinctive:

    Stop at description without recommending action

    line 159

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Porter's Five Forces Analyzer

Industry-structure analysis that explains why some markets are profitable and others aren't.

What this skill is

A workflow that applies the Five Forces framework developed by Michael Porter with quantitative pressure scoring (1-5 per force) and the structural drivers behind each score. It surfaces the dominant force, identifies where the company can move the structure in its favor, and produces a positioning recommendation that goes beyond "the industry is attractive or unattractive."

What it solves

  • Industry analysis that stops at "competition is intense" without identifying which force matters most
  • Strategy memos that ignore supplier or buyer power
  • Treating substitutes only as direct competitors (missing adjacent threats)
  • Static analysis with no view on how forces are evolving
  • Recommendations disconnected from the structural levers identified

When to invoke

  • Entering a new vertical, geography, or product category
  • Pre-Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) diligence in an unfamiliar industry
  • Defending current strategy when challenger dynamics shift
  • Annual strategic plan industry-context refresh
  • Board memo justifying a market exit or entry

Phase 1: Define the industry boundary

Industries are not obvious - and a bad boundary choice invalidates the analysis. Decide:

  • Product or service scope - what's in, what's out (e.g., "Business-to-Business (B2B) fleet telematics" vs. "vehicle hardware")
  • Geography - global, regional, country-specific
  • Customer segment - enterprise versus small and medium business; consumer versus industrial
  • Value chain stage - manufacturer, distributor, retailer, service provider

Different boundaries can produce different forces. Document the choice explicitly.

Phase 2: Force 1 - Supplier power

Score 1 (weak) to 5 (strong) and explain drivers:

DriverPushes power UPPushes power DOWN
Supplier concentrationFew, dominant suppliersMany fragmented suppliers
Switching costsHigh (proprietary inputs)Low (commodity)
Forward integration threatCredibleNot feasible
Importance of industry to supplierSmall customer for themLarge customer
Substitute inputsNoneMany viable
Differentiation of inputsHighly differentiatedCommoditized

Cite specific suppliers when known (e.g., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) for advanced silicon).

Phase 3: Force 2 - Buyer power

DriverPushes power UPPushes power DOWN
Buyer concentrationFew large buyersMany small buyers
Switching costsLow for buyerHigh (lock-in, contracts)
Backward integration threatCredibleNot feasible
Price sensitivityProduct is large percent of buyer's costSmall share
Product differentiationCommoditizedHighly differentiated
Buyer informationFull price transparencyAsymmetric

Sub-segment buyers - enterprise behaves differently from small and medium business.

Phase 4: Force 3 - Threat of new entrants

BarrierHigh barrierLow barrier
Economies of scaleRequiredNot required
Capital requirementsHeavyLight
Network effectsStrongNone
Switching costs for buyersHighLow
Access to distributionLocked upOpen
Brand and customer loyaltyStrongWeak
Regulatory licensesRequired, scarceNone
Proprietary technology or dataDefensibleReplicable
Incumbent retaliationCredibleUnlikely

Score the net entry barrier 1 (low → high entry threat) to 5 (high → low threat).

Phase 5: Force 4 - Threat of substitutes

Substitutes are alternative solutions to the same customer job - not direct competitors. Examples:

  • Video conferencing → in-person meetings, asynchronous video, written documents
  • Ride-sharing → public transit, walking, owning a car, working from home
DriverPushes threat UPPushes threat DOWN
Substitute price-performanceImprovingDegrading
Buyer propensity to substituteHighLow (entrenched habits)
Cost of switching to substituteLowHigh

Map the performance trajectory of substitutes over the next 3-5 years.

Phase 6: Force 5 - Rivalry intensity

DriverHigher rivalryLower rivalry
Competitor concentrationMany similarly-sizedFew, with clear leader
Industry growthSlow or decliningFast
Fixed costs or capacityHigh (drives price competition)Low
Product differentiationLowHigh
Exit barriersHigh (forces stay-and-fight)Low
Strategic stakesHigh for multiple playersLow

Phase 7: Aggregate and dominant force

ForceScore (1-5)Dominant driversTrajectory (3 years)
Supplier powerx↑↓→
Buyer powerx↑↓→
New entrantsx↑↓→
Substitutesx↑↓→
Rivalryx↑↓→

Identify:

  • Dominant force - the one most depressing industry profitability
  • Industry attractiveness - sum scores; under 12 attractive, 12-18 moderate, over 18 difficult
  • Direction of travel - net force pressure trajectory

Phase 8: Strategic implications

The point of the Five Forces is not just "what's the industry like?" but what to do about it. For each force, identify the strategic lever:

ForceStrategic moves
Supplier powerVertically integrate, multi-source, build alternatives, build internal capability
Buyer powerDifferentiate, raise switching costs, segment, build ecosystem
EntrantsRaise barriers (scale, network effects, intellectual property), preempt, M&A consolidation
SubstitutesImprove relative price-performance, redefine the job, partner with substitutes
RivalryDifferentiate, segment, consolidate via M&A, signal credibly to discourage price wars

Output

  • Five-force scorecard with drivers cited
  • Industry boundary statement and trajectory of each force
  • Dominant force identification and reasoning
  • Industry attractiveness rating
  • Strategic recommendation: where to invest to reshape the forces in your favor
  • 3 leading indicators to monitor that would change the analysis

Operating rules

Always

  • State the industry boundary explicitly
  • Score each force on a 1-5 scale with drivers cited
  • Identify the dominant force, not a generic "competition"
  • Project a 3-year trajectory per force
  • Translate analysis into specific strategic moves

Never

  • Treat the Five Forces as a static one-time exercise
  • Confuse substitutes with direct competitors
  • Conflate industry attractiveness with company performance
  • Skip the boundary definition
  • Stop at description without recommending action

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.