blue-ocean-strategy-canvas
Skill1 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub
Builds a Blue Ocean Strategy Canvas with the as-is competitive value curve, the Eliminate-Reduce-Raise-Create (ERRC) grid, the to-be value curve, and a non-customer analysis to find uncontested market space. Use when an industry is commoditizing; differentiating against an entrenched incumbent; designing a new category; or reframing strategy around buyer utility instead of feature parity.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-activation-optimizerSkill
- ai-content-quality-gateSkill
- ai-feature-experiment-designerSkill
- ai-launch-playbookSkill
- ai-pricing-margin-modelerSkill
- ai-product-positioningSkill
- ai-search-visibility-optimizerSkill
- agent-autonomy-level-mapperSkill
- ai-failure-state-designerSkill
- ai-usability-test-plannerSkill
- ai-ux-auditSkill
- human-in-the-loop-designerSkill
- prompt-surface-designerSkill
- uncertainty-and-explainability-patternsSkill
- ai-agent-financial-analystSkill
- burn-rate-runway-plannerSkill
- capital-allocation-frameworkSkill
- dcf-valuation-builderSkill
- financial-statement-analyzerSkill
- saas-cohort-analyzerSkill
- competitive-response-modelerSkill
- mechanism-design-plannerSkill
- nash-equilibrium-solverSkill
- negotiation-strategistSkill
- repeated-game-strategistSkill
- ai-decision-engineSkill
- ai-product-strategySkill
- ai-stakeholder-translatorSkill
- customer-interview-synthesizerSkill
- jobs-to-be-done-extractorSkill
- opportunity-solution-treeSkill
- product-discovery-coachSkill
- product-roadmap-prioritizerSkill
- go-to-market-strategySkill
- gtm-engineeringSkill
- market-sizingSkill
- okr-cascade-plannerSkill
- porters-five-forces-analyzerSkill
- pricing-strategy-analyzerSkill
- strategic-landscape-mapperSkill
- swot-tows-analyzerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 80
If the to-be curve fails any test, iterate.
- Distinctive: line 103
If any hurdle fails, return to Phase 3.
- Distinctive: line 129
Test against all three tiers of non-customers
- Distinctive: line 131
Run the sequence test before committing
- Distinctive: line 134
Add factors without eliminating others
- Distinctive: line 135
Treat lower-priced parity as a blue ocean
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Blue Ocean Strategy Canvas
Find uncontested market space instead of fighting for share in a bloody red ocean.
What this skill is
A workflow built on the Blue Ocean Strategy work of W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne: map the industry value curve, identify which factors to Eliminate, Reduce, Raise, or Create (ERRC), profile the three tiers of non-customers, and design a to-be value curve that breaks the value-cost trade-off. Produces a defensible strategic move with a buyer utility map and a sequence test.
What it solves
- Strategy that benchmarks against competitors and copies their factors
- Roadmaps that compete on every dimension instead of choosing which to abandon
- Feature parity wars that erode margins
- Ignoring non-customers (the largest source of new demand)
- Confusing "different" with "differentiated" - different on dimensions buyers don't value
When to invoke
- Industry commoditization with margin compression
- Entering a market with an entrenched incumbent
- Designing a new category versus competing in an existing one
- Refreshing positioning when feature lists no longer differentiate
- Reframing strategy around buyer utility instead of competitor benchmarks
Phase 1: Map the as-is strategy canvas
The strategy canvas plots competing factors on the horizontal axis and offering level (low to high) on the vertical axis.
For each major competitor and the company:
- List the 6-12 factors the industry currently competes on (price, feature set, service levels, brand prestige, etc.)
- Score each factor 1 (low offering) to 5 (high offering)
- Plot the value curve
The as-is canvas typically shows:
- Most players hugging the same curve (convergence → red ocean)
- Industry-wide overinvestment in 1-2 factors (the standards-arms race)
- Industry-wide underinvestment in factors buyers actually care about
Phase 2: Identify non-customers (three tiers)
| Tier | Definition | Question |
| 1 - Soon-to-be | Use the industry minimally, ready to switch out | Why are they on the verge of leaving? |
| 2 - Refusing | Considered the industry, rejected it | What would have to change for them to consider? |
| 3 - Unexplored | Never considered the industry | What job are they doing instead? |
The biggest pool of latent demand is Tier 3 - non-customers who didn't realize this industry serves their job.
Phase 3: Apply the ERRC grid
For each industry factor, decide one of four actions:
| Action | Question | Effect |
| Eliminate | Which factors that the industry takes for granted can be eliminated? | Drops cost |
| Reduce | Which factors should be reduced well below industry standard? | Drops cost |
| Raise | Which factors should be raised well above industry standard? | Lifts buyer value |
| Create | Which factors should be created that the industry has never offered? | Lifts buyer value, creates new demand |
The grid is the strategic act. A canvas with only "Raise" and "Create" is unprofitable; a canvas with only "Eliminate" and "Reduce" is a discount play. You need all four.
Phase 4: Draw the to-be value curve
Re-plot the canvas with:
- Removed factors (eliminate column gone)
- Lowered factors (reduce column)
- Raised factors (raise column)
- New factors (create column)
The to-be curve must satisfy three tests:
- Focus - the curve has clear high points, not flat across all factors
- Divergence - it diverges visibly from competitor curves
- Compelling tagline - the strategy can be summarized in one sentence
If the to-be curve fails any test, iterate.
Phase 5: Buyer utility map
For the to-be offering, map utility levers across the buyer experience cycle:
Stages: Purchase → Delivery → Use → Supplements → Maintenance → Disposal
Levers: Productivity, Simplicity, Convenience, Risk, Fun and Image,
Environmental friendlinessA 6-by-6 map produces 36 cells. The current industry occupies one or two cells. Most blue oceans come from finding utility in an empty cell.
Phase 6: Sequence test (the 4 hurdles)
In order:
- Buyer utility - does the offering deliver exceptional utility?
- Strategic price - is the price attainable by the mass of target buyers?
- Cost target - can we hit the cost given the strategic price?
- Adoption hurdles - what stops customers, partners, employees, regulators from adopting?
If any hurdle fails, return to Phase 3.
Phase 7: Tipping-point execution
Identify the high-leverage actors:
- Cool spots - areas of disproportionate impact (segments, geographies, channels)
- Hot spots - bottleneck constraints to overcome first
- Key influencers - small group whose adoption tips the wider market
Sequence execution around tipping points instead of broad parallel investment.
Output
- As-is strategy canvas with company and 2-3 competitors plotted
- Non-customer tier analysis with insight per tier
- ERRC grid with at least 2 entries in each column
- To-be value curve passing focus, divergence, and tagline tests
- Buyer utility map highlighting target utility cells
- Sequence test verdict (utility, price, cost, adoption)
- Tipping-point execution plan with first 90-day moves
Operating rules
Always
- Plot at least 2 competitor value curves before your own
- Include all 4 ERRC actions
- Test against all three tiers of non-customers
- Validate the to-be curve with the focus, divergence, and tagline tests
- Run the sequence test before committing
Never
- Add factors without eliminating others
- Treat lower-priced parity as a blue ocean
- Skip non-customer analysis
- Design a curve that hugs an existing competitor's
- Confuse "first to market" with "uncontested market space"
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

