agentleFS
vanillagreencomvanillagreencom/kendex/.agents/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md

deep-research

Skill76 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Load for research tasks, architectural investigations, and vendor, library, or technology comparisons.

  • Reads credentials

196 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use community-led-growth, ph-community-outreach and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • nicepkgSkill

    community-led-growth

    Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    ph-community-outreach

    Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • W-MoorerSkill

    academic-paper-reviewer

    Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • W-MoorerSkill

    academic-pipeline

    Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • xfstudioSkill

    micro-saas-launcher

    Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • stophobiaSkill

    surprise-me

    Create a delightful, unexpected "wow" experience for the user by dynamically discovering and creatively combining other enabled skills. Triggers when the user says "surprise me" or any request expressing a desire for an unexpected creative showcase. Also triggers when the user is bored, wants inspiration, or asks for "something interesting".

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +4 more from nicepkg
  • +1 more from W-Moorer

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Write findings.md to the path the caller requested, exactly.

    line 34
  2. Very specific:

    Every mode uses the same findings sections.

    line 38
  3. Distinctive:

    Read for these yourself:

    line 72

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- kendex:project-instructions:start -->

Project Instructions

<!-- kendex:shared-instructions:start -->

Problems with a kendex-owned skill go through kendex report; check ownership in the file first.

<!-- kendex:shared-instructions:end --><!-- kendex:project-instructions:end -->

Deep Research

In Pi with the web_research tool active, use that tool, passing outputPath when creating a report. In every other harness, run scripts/deep-research with EXA_API_KEY set.

Rules

  • Exa is the research source. Substitute a general web search only when Exa is unavailable and the user approves the fallback.
  • Write findings.md to the path the caller requested, exactly.
  • Cite sources for material claims. Provider payloads go in the sidecar JSON (findings.raw.json beside the report by default), never inline. Sanitize evidence excerpts: source-page headings must not render as headings.
  • Once the report and its sidecar exist, run validate and stop. No local reproduction, benchmarks, tests, code inspection, or implementation unless the caller asked for it.
  • A missing EXA_API_KEY fails with setup instructions. Set it on this package's Customize tab in the kendex app, or by hand in the project's private env file — .env.local unless KENDEX_ENV_FILE names another. The value may be a key or a 1Password op://vault/item/field reference when the op CLI is installed and signed in.
  • Every mode uses the same findings sections. Record mode and source counts in ## Research Metadata.

Running

.agents/skills/deep-research/scripts/deep-research report "question" --mode standard --output path/to/findings.md
.agents/skills/deep-research/scripts/deep-research report --query-file prompt.txt --context-glob 'context-*.md' --mode full --output findings.md
.agents/skills/deep-research/scripts/deep-research json "question" --output raw.json
.agents/skills/deep-research/scripts/deep-research validate findings.md findings.raw.json
.agents/skills/deep-research/scripts/deep-research doctor

deep-research help lists every flag. Exa /search caps the settings behind them: numResults 1-100, text.maxCharacters 1-10000, additionalQueries at most 10.

ModeExa typeResultsText capTimeoutSynthesis
litedeep-lite1510k chars/result5 minNot requested, evidence brief only
standarddeep-reasoning5010k chars/result10 minRequested via outputSchema
fulldeep-reasoning10010k chars/result30 minRequested, per query

standard is the default; lite for fast spikes, full for strategic or high-risk decisions. --type, --num-results, and --text-max-characters override a mode's defaults.

--additional-query (repeatable) reaches Exa as additionalQueries within the single request under lite and standard, and as one request per query with URLs deduped across responses under full.

--include-domain is a hard host filter, not a quality filter: --include-domain github.com admits every repo on it and excludes everything else. Name authoritative projects and organizations in the query text for quality; audit the returned source list either way.

Validation

.agents/skills/deep-research/scripts/deep-research validate path/to/findings.md path/to/findings.raw.json

Prints {ok, errors, warnings, mode, synthesis, queryCount}; exits 0 when there are no errors. Checks structure only: required sections present, sidecar parses, query-expansion metadata self-consistent, synthesized answer present for modes that requested one.

Read for these yourself:

  • Claims the cited sources contradict. Spot-check material numbers against the sidecar source text.
  • Off-topic sources that share an acronym or name with the subject.
  • Recommendations with no claim-level support in Evidence and Sources.
  • Results generalized past what the source established.

Findings format

templates/findings.md carries exactly the sections validate requires, in order. Key Findings holds distinct claims, not a restatement of the summary.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.