deep-research
Skill76 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Load for research tasks, architectural investigations, and vendor, library, or technology comparisons.
- Reads credentials
196 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ridelink0/ultimate-frontend-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- chrisblattman/claudeblattmantheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- genericService/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ourostack/ouroboros-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mahsumaktas/agent-evolution-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- insight68/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use community-led-growth, ph-community-outreach and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillph-community-outreach
Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
W-MoorerSkillacademic-paper-reviewer
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
Also in 11 projects that use this
W-MoorerSkillacademic-pipeline
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
Also in 10 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillmicro-saas-launcher
Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.
Also in 5 projects that use this
stophobiaSkillsurprise-me
Create a delightful, unexpected "wow" experience for the user by dynamically discovering and creatively combining other enabled skills. Triggers when the user says "surprise me" or any request expressing a desire for an unexpected creative showcase. Also triggers when the user is bored, wants inspiration, or asks for "something interesting".
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +4 more from nicepkg
- +1 more from W-Moorer
Other versions196 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 196
- affaan-m/ECC★ 246ksame name
- bytedance/deer-flow★ 85ksame name
- Imbad0202/academic-research-skills★ 56ksame name
- THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC★ 43ksame name
- HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills★ 12ksame name
- genspark-ai/genoffice★ 12ksame name
- advaitpaliwal/feynman★ 10ksame name
- companion-inc/feynman★ 10ksame name
- getcompanion-ai/feynman★ 10ksame name
- jordan-gibbs/hyperresearch★ 4.4ksame name
186 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- crates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- hooks/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- pi-extensions/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- tools/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ui/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- crates/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- hooks/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- pi-extensions/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skills/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- tools/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ui/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- app-deploySkill
- bot-instructionsSkill
- code-qualitySkill
- commit-guardsSkill
- deciderSkill
- dep-radarSkill
- devSkill
- doc-limitsSkill
- docs-writingSkill
- githubSkill
- iced-rsSkill
- kendex-issuesSkill
- linearSkill
- orchSkill
- preflightSkill
- price-handlingSkill
- project-managementSkill
- reviewerSkill
- review-gateSkill
- second-opinionSkill
- worktreeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 34
Write findings.md to the path the caller requested, exactly.
- Very specific: line 38
Every mode uses the same findings sections.
- Distinctive: line 72
Read for these yourself:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- kendex:project-instructions:start -->Project Instructions
<!-- kendex:shared-instructions:start -->Problems with a kendex-owned skill go through kendex report; check ownership in the file first.
<!-- kendex:shared-instructions:end --><!-- kendex:project-instructions:end -->Deep Research
In Pi with the web_research tool active, use that tool, passing outputPath when creating a report. In every other harness, run scripts/deep-research with EXA_API_KEY set.
Rules
- Exa is the research source. Substitute a general web search only when Exa is unavailable and the user approves the fallback.
- Write
findings.mdto the path the caller requested, exactly. - Cite sources for material claims. Provider payloads go in the sidecar JSON (
findings.raw.jsonbeside the report by default), never inline. Sanitize evidence excerpts: source-page headings must not render as headings. - Once the report and its sidecar exist, run
validateand stop. No local reproduction, benchmarks, tests, code inspection, or implementation unless the caller asked for it. - A missing
EXA_API_KEYfails with setup instructions. Set it on this package's Customize tab in the kendex app, or by hand in the project's private env file —.env.localunlessKENDEX_ENV_FILEnames another. The value may be a key or a 1Passwordop://vault/item/fieldreference when theopCLI is installed and signed in. - Every mode uses the same findings sections. Record mode and source counts in
## Research Metadata.
Running
.agents/skills/deep-research/scripts/deep-research report "question" --mode standard --output path/to/findings.md
.agents/skills/deep-research/scripts/deep-research report --query-file prompt.txt --context-glob 'context-*.md' --mode full --output findings.md
.agents/skills/deep-research/scripts/deep-research json "question" --output raw.json
.agents/skills/deep-research/scripts/deep-research validate findings.md findings.raw.json
.agents/skills/deep-research/scripts/deep-research doctordeep-research help lists every flag. Exa /search caps the settings behind them: numResults 1-100, text.maxCharacters 1-10000, additionalQueries at most 10.
| Mode | Exa type | Results | Text cap | Timeout | Synthesis |
lite | deep-lite | 15 | 10k chars/result | 5 min | Not requested, evidence brief only |
standard | deep-reasoning | 50 | 10k chars/result | 10 min | Requested via outputSchema |
full | deep-reasoning | 100 | 10k chars/result | 30 min | Requested, per query |
standard is the default; lite for fast spikes, full for strategic or high-risk decisions. --type, --num-results, and --text-max-characters override a mode's defaults.
--additional-query (repeatable) reaches Exa as additionalQueries within the single request under lite and standard, and as one request per query with URLs deduped across responses under full.
--include-domain is a hard host filter, not a quality filter: --include-domain github.com admits every repo on it and excludes everything else. Name authoritative projects and organizations in the query text for quality; audit the returned source list either way.
Validation
.agents/skills/deep-research/scripts/deep-research validate path/to/findings.md path/to/findings.raw.jsonPrints {ok, errors, warnings, mode, synthesis, queryCount}; exits 0 when there are no errors. Checks structure only: required sections present, sidecar parses, query-expansion metadata self-consistent, synthesized answer present for modes that requested one.
Read for these yourself:
- Claims the cited sources contradict. Spot-check material numbers against the sidecar source text.
- Off-topic sources that share an acronym or name with the subject.
- Recommendations with no claim-level support in Evidence and Sources.
- Results generalized past what the source established.
Findings format
templates/findings.md carries exactly the sections validate requires, in order. Key Findings holds distinct claims, not a restatement of the summary.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

