agentleFS
vanillagreencomvanillagreencom/kendex/.agents/skills/decider/SKILL.md

decider

Skill76 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Load to create, search, or supersede an architecture decision record.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the full decision file before acting on a hit.

    line 34
  2. Distinctive:

    Never create a decision document without explicit user approval.

    line 47

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- kendex:project-instructions:start -->

Project Instructions

<!-- kendex:shared-instructions:start -->

Problems with a kendex-owned skill go through kendex report; check ownership in the file first.

<!-- kendex:shared-instructions:end --><!-- kendex:project-instructions:end -->

Decider

Numbered decision documents indexed in one INDEX.md (default docs/decisions/), with a search CLI, canonical format, and creation/supersession workflows.

.agents/skills/decider/scripts/decisions <command> [options]

Actions (search, search --issue, list, next-id, get), search coverage and scoring, output shapes, and the DECISIONS_DIR / DECISION_ID_* environment: decisions --help. There is no bare issue action; use search --issue.

Read the full decision file before acting on a hit. A suggestion contradicting an active decision is invalid unless the decision itself is flawed.

Workflows

WorkflowTrigger
workflows/create-decision.mdA significant path choice is settled
workflows/update-decision.mdA new decision supersedes, partially supersedes, or revisits an existing one

Format: schemas/decision-format.md (constraints), templates/decision-entry.md (document skeleton), templates/index-row.md (INDEX row).

Approval

Never create a decision document without explicit user approval. When work settles a choice worth recording, say on completion: "this introduced a decision worth recording: [summary]. Want me to create a decision entry?"

Record: technology selections with alternatives, performance trade-offs, path choices whose conditions may change. Do not record: variable names, small refactors, bug fixes, choices with no realistic alternative, standard pattern applications.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.