agentleFS
uplikauplika/uplika-plugin/skills/yt-comment/SKILL.md

yt-comment

Skill3 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub

Triage YouTube comments into four piles and reply in the creator's voice, sent after approval. For 'reply to my comments', a comment thread.

5 other projects use a version of this, 5 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 5 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 5

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Never invent a number, a result or a source.

    line 15
  2. Very specific:

    If a call answers workspace_required, show the workspaces it lists, ask which one, and pass workspaceId.

    line 24
  3. Common:

    Corrections: if they are right, say so plainly and thank them.

    line 36
  4. Common:

    Bait: do not reply. Say so and move on.

    line 38
  5. Common:

    No emoji unless the person's own replies use them.

    line 45
  6. Common:

    Never promise a video they have not agreed to make.

    line 46

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Adapted from Jakeschincariol/youtube-agent-skill (MIT). Not affiliated with the original author.

yt-comment

The comment section is a retention surface, not a chore. Replies in the first few hours are what decide whether a thread becomes a conversation other people read. Use it for "reply to my comments", "handle the comment section", "someone asked X", or a pasted comment thread.

Before you write

  1. Read ~/.uplika/<workspace-slug>/voice.md if it exists. That is the person's voice profile: how they talk on camera, the words they never use, who they are talking to, what they will not claim. If it does not exist, create it with the voice-profile skill; if they would rather not, ask its three questions (tone, ending style, words to avoid) and use the answers for this session.
  2. Never invent a number, a result or a source. If a figure would strengthen it and you do not have one, ask for it or write the line without it.

With Uplika connected

  1. Find the video. Take the link from the person, or find the YouTube account in list_accounts and pick the video from list_channel_posts (each item has a permalink).
  2. Read the comments with list_replies on the video link. truncated means the list stopped before the end; say so. YouTube does not mark which comments are the creator's own, so skip the ones written under the channel's own name. If the answer is comments_closed, comments are turned off on that video.
  3. Triage and write as below.
  4. Show every reply and every hide (the comment and what you will do with it) and send only what the person approves: reply with the video link as id, the comment's id from list_replies as replyTo, and wait: true. Bait the person wants out of sight goes through hide_reply with the comment id and the video as postId; hide: false shows it again.
  5. Pinning and hearting are not among Uplika's tools: name the comment to pin and the ones to heart, and the person does it in YouTube Studio.
  6. If a call answers workspace_required, show the workspaces it lists, ask which one, and pass workspaceId. A channel that is not connected: https://uplika.com/dashboard/connections. Other errors: get_help with the code; reconsent_required and account_disconnected go to the troubleshoot skill.
  7. youtube_quota_exhausted from list_replies or hide_reply, or a reply whose target ends with youtube_daily_cap: Uplika's daily YouTube limit, which everyone on Uplika shares, ran out: stop and do not repeat the call, tell the person when it refills (resetsAt, or the time in the message), and do not ask them to reconnect, because it is not their account (faq:youtube-daily-limit). Keep the approved replies and send them after that time.

Without Uplika

The person pastes the comment thread, and posts the approved replies themselves.

Triage first, always

Sort the comments into four piles and say how many are in each before writing anything:

  1. Questions: answer them. These are the next video's topics, so note the repeats.
  2. Corrections: if they are right, say so plainly and thank them. Never argue a fact you cannot check.
  3. Praise: reply to a few, briefly, with something specific from their comment. A wall of identical "thank you!" replies reads as automated because it is.
  4. Bait: do not reply. Say so and move on. Never write a comeback, however deserved.

Writing the reply

  • Under 30 words. A long reply in a comment thread is a blog post nobody asked for.
  • Answer the actual question in the first sentence.
  • One question back, only when it is real.
  • No emoji unless the person's own replies use them. Check their voice file.
  • Never promise a video they have not agreed to make.

The heart and the pin

Say which ONE comment to pin and why. Pin the question the most people also have, not the nicest one. Heart generously: it costs nothing and it is visible.

The gate

Nothing goes out until the person says yes. Every output ends in a block they can copy, and the last line of every run is the question: ship it, or change it? With Uplika connected, "ship it" means you send the approved replies with reply.

Tools

  • list_accounts: the YouTube account id
  • list_channel_posts: the channel's videos and their links
  • list_replies: the comments under a video
  • reply: post an approved reply under a comment
  • hide_reply: hide a comment the person wants out of sight, or show it again
  • get_help: the answer for an error code

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.