ig-human
Skill3 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Humanize a draft. Strip em dashes, stock AI phrases and invisible characters, then score it on five checks before it is shown or posted.
8 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- diegotrigal/redes-sociales-latamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- aipphilie/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Oumi-Mez/Claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- lodhaarihant/instagram-agent-arihantedited, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- postzen-dev/instagram-agent-skilledited, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- nessalazne/instagram-agent-skilledited, first seen Sep 28, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 7
- Jakeschincariol/instagram-agent-skill★ 8883% same
- postzen-dev/instagram-agent-skill★ 3483% same
- nessalazne/instagram-agent-skill★ 383% same
- aipphilie/claude-skills★ 083% same
- larkinmd7/instagram-agent-skill★ 083% same
- lodhaarihant/instagram-agent-arihant★ 083% same
- Oumi-Mez/Claude-skills★ 083% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- diegotrigal/redes-sociales-latam★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository50 other files it gives its agents.
- automationsSkill
- commentsSkill
- hooksSkill
- ig-auditSkill
- ig-captionSkill
- ig-carouselSkill
- ig-dmSkill
- ig-profileSkill
- ig-reelSkill
- ig-storySkill
- ig-viralSkill
- inboxSkill
- linkedin-comment-drafterSkill
- linkedin-content-plannerSkill
- linkedin-employee-advocacySkill
- linkedin-engager-analyticsSkill
- linkedin-hook-extractorSkill
- linkedin-humanizerSkill
- linkedin-interviewerSkill
- linkedin-post-writerSkill
- linkedin-profile-optimizerSkill
- linkedin-reply-handlerSkill
- linkedin-repurposerSkill
- linkedin-thread-monitorSkill
- naver-ai-citeSkill
- naver-draftsSkill
- naver-engageSkill
- naver-keywordsSkill
- naver-postSkill
- performance-reviewSkill
- publishSkill
- repurposeSkill
- schedule-weekSkill
- setupSkill
- threadsSkill
- troubleshootSkill
- voice-profileSkill
- yt-auditSkill
- yt-benchmarkSkill
- yt-chaptersSkill
- yt-commentSkill
- yt-editSkill
- yt-packageSkill
- yt-planSkill
- yt-retentionSkill
- yt-scriptSkill
- yt-seoSkill
- yt-shortsSkill
- yt-uploadSkill
- yt-viralSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 1 is common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
1
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use whenever text needs to sound human: when the person says humanize, "does this sound like AI", "remove the em dashes", "de-slop this", …
- Common: line 72
Read the structural flags.
- Distinctive: line 74
If the verdict is not PASS, fix the weakest check named in the output and go again.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Adapted from Jakeschincariol/instagram-agent-skill (MIT). Not affiliated with the original author.
ig-human
Use whenever text needs to sound human: when the person says humanize, "does this sound like AI", "remove the em dashes", "de-slop this", "this sounds like ChatGPT", and before any caption, script, comment reply or DM is shown to the person.
Two scripts live in this skill's scripts/ folder and they both actually run. Use them. Do not eyeball this. From this skill's folder:
python3 scripts/humanize.py draft.txt --report # clean it, show what changed
python3 scripts/detect.py draft.txt # score it, five checks
python3 scripts/detect.py before.txt after.txt # prove the deltaBoth read scripts/slop.json: stock words and phrases with plain-English replacements, invisible character classes, typographic substitutions and structural tells. The last block of each list is Instagram-specific, the vocabulary that only shows up in captions and voiceovers. It is meant to be edited. If the person has a word they always use that the lexicon strips, take it out of the file.
The lexicon, the structural flags and the five scores are English. On Korean or other non-English text only the invisible-character and typography passes mean anything: run scripts/humanize.py for those, then read the draft yourself for stock phrasing, and do not report the human score as a verdict. Without a terminal the scripts cannot run: apply the same passes by reading and say that no score was computed.
Why this matters more on Instagram than it looks
Captions are short and scripts get said out loud. A written-sounding line in a short caption is a larger share of the text than the same line in an essay, and a voiceover that nobody could say naturally is obvious in the first take. The tell here is not a detector flagging the post. The tell is a person scrolling past something that reads like a brand, or a creator stumbling over their own script.
What gets fixed automatically
1. Invisible characters. Zero-width spaces and joiners, word joiners, soft hyphens, byte-order marks, Unicode tag characters, invisible separators, non-breaking and narrow spaces. A keyboard does not produce these. They survive copy-paste, they are invisible in every editor, and they are the most mechanical thing in generated text. scripts/humanize.py deletes every one, including any remaining Unicode format character it does not have a name for.
2. Typography. Em dash to comma, en dash to hyphen, curly quotes to straight, ellipsis to three dots, bullet character to hyphen. The em dash pass is the one that matters: it collapses the dash to a comma and then cleans up the double punctuation and orphaned periods that leaves behind.
3. The slop lexicon. delve, leverage, robust, seamless, crucial, testament to, "in today's fast-paced world", plus the Instagram block: "stop scrolling", "in today's video", "follow for more", "tag someone who needs this", "the algorithm loves", "run don't walk". Each swapped for a plain word or deleted, with capitalisation preserved and URLs left untouched.
What does NOT get fixed automatically
Structural tells get flagged, not rewritten, because changing the shape of a sentence needs judgement:
- "It's not just X, it's Y" and "not only X but also Y"
- Rule-of-three triads
- Rhetorical one-word question lines: "The result?"
- The video preamble: "in this video I'm going to show you"
- Emoji bullet lists
- Three or more shouted words in a row
- Hashtag walls
- Reflex bait: "follow for more", "tag someone who", "double tap if"
That list is your job. Rewrite each flagged line by hand, keeping the meaning, then re-run scripts/detect.py. This is the part that moves the score from REVIEW to PASS, and it is the part a script cannot do.
The five checks
scripts/detect.py scores five signals 0-100, higher is more human:
| check | what it measures | machine looks like |
| BURSTINESS | sentence-length variation | every sentence the same length |
| SPECIFICITY | numbers, names, concrete markers per 100 words | abstract nouns, no figures |
| SLOP DENSITY | lexicon hits per 100 words | stock vocabulary |
| FINGERPRINT | invisible chars, em dashes, curly quotes per 1k chars | typographically perfect |
| VOICE | contractions, person, structural tells | no contractions, staged reveals |
The verdict weights the mean at 60% and the weakest single check at 40%, because one signal is enough. PASS needs an overall of 70+ with no check below 55. The script exits non-zero until the verdict is PASS; that is its answer, not a crash.
Say this honestly
These are five local heuristics modelled on the signals public detectors key on. They run entirely on the person's machine and nothing is uploaded. They are not GPTZero, Originality, Copyleaks, Winston or Turnitin, they do not call those APIs, and they cannot promise those verdicts. Fixing what they measure does tend to move those numbers, because they are measuring the same underlying things. That is the claim. Do not make a bigger one on the person's behalf, and do not tell anyone their text is undetectable.
Order of operations
python3 scripts/humanize.py draft.txt -o clean.txt --report- Read the structural flags. Rewrite those lines yourself.
python3 scripts/detect.py draft.txt clean.txtto show the before and after.- If the verdict is not PASS, fix the weakest check named in the output and go again. Two rounds is normal. Five means the draft was written by formula, and the fix is a different draft, not more passes.
- Show the person the cleaned text and the score. Never the score alone.
With Uplika connected
Nothing changes in how this runs: it works on text, on the person's machine, and Uplika does not run this check for you. Run it on anything another skill is about to send out through Uplika (a caption before it is published, a comment reply, a DM draft), and show the person the cleaned text before they approve the send.
Without Uplika
Paste the draft and run the order of operations above. The person copies the cleaned text wherever it goes.
Tools
None. This skill works on text on the person's machine and calls no Uplika tool.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

