golang-testing
Skill261 starsChanged 2 months agoBSD-3-ClauseView on GitHub
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI, or debugging flaky/slow tests. For testify-specific APIs see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testify`; for measurement methodology see `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark`.
- Installs packages
53 other projects use a version of this, 14 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- epulla/patiotheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- FimawLLC/fimaw-skillsedited, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- Rojios/everything-claude-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- aiproxer/aiproxertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ahmadvahidi/skill-atlastheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- TeddyAlbina/skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use golang-how-to, golang-samber-lo and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
alexastrumSkillgolang-how-to
Golang skills orchestrator — always active on any Golang coding, review, debug, or setup task. Reads the task context and loads the most relevant skills from samber/cc-skills-golang, often multiple at once: writing a gRPC service loads golang-grpc + golang-testing + golang-error-handling; debugging a panic loads golang-troubleshooting + golang-safety; auditing security loads golang-security + golang-lint + golang-safety. Also: disambiguates competing clusters when two skills seem to overlap (performance vs benchmark vs troubleshooting, samber/lo vs mo vs ro, DI cluster, safety vs security), and configures CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md to force-trigger skills in a project (/golang-how-to configure).
Also in 7 projects that use this
guynhsichngeodiecSkillgolang-samber-lo
Functional programming helpers for Golang using samber/lo — 500+ type-safe generic functions for slices, maps, channels, strings, math, tuples, and concurrency (Map, Filter, Reduce, GroupBy, Chunk, Flatten, Find, Uniq, etc.). Core immutable package (lo), concurrent variants (lo/parallel aka lop), in-place mutations (lo/mutable aka lom), lazy iterators (lo/it aka loi for Go 1.23+), and experimental SIMD (lo/exp/simd). Apply when using or adopting samber/lo, when the codebase imports github.com/samber/lo, or when implementing functional-style data transformations in Go. Not for streaming pipelines (→ See golang-samber-ro skill).
Also in 9 projects that use this
tquangkhai98Skillgolang-cli
Golang CLI application development. Use when building, modifying, or reviewing a Go CLI tool — especially for command structure, flag handling, configuration layering, version embedding, exit codes, I/O patterns, signal handling, shell completion, argument validation, and CLI unit testing. Also triggers when code uses cobra, viper, or urfave/cli.
Also in 11 projects that use this
tquangkhai98Skillgolang-structs-interfaces
Golang struct and interface design patterns — composition, embedding, type assertions, type switches, interface segregation, dependency injection via interfaces, struct field tags, and pointer vs value receivers. Use this skill when designing Go types, defining or implementing interfaces, embedding structs or interfaces, writing type assertions or type switches, adding struct field tags for JSON/YAML/DB serialization, or choosing between pointer and value receivers. Also use when the user asks about \"accept interfaces, return structs\", compile-time interface checks, or composing small interfaces into larger ones.
Also in 11 projects that use this
- +2 more from tquangkhai98
Other versions53 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- samber/cc-skills-golang★ 3.9k100% same
- rzisso/golang-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 14
- klawisha012/agentsync★ 1887% same
- alexastrum/skl★ 1183% same
- tstapler/dotfiles★ 867% same
- tquangkhai98/browser-profiles-manager★ 572% same
- FimawLLC/fimaw-skills★ 389% same
- idexal/idexal-skills★ 289% same
- insidemedia/monipenny★ 282% same
- poizoncoded/skills★ 273% same
- TeddyAlbina/skills★ 283% same
- rockcookies/skills★ 187% same
4 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 37
- sazardev/goca★ 299same name
- loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes★ 272same name
- Fmarzochi/EGC★ 61same name
- jmrplens/gitlab-mcp-server★ 52same name
- jmrplens/libgen-mcp★ 33same name
- aiproxer/aiproxer★ 24same name
- castle-x/skills-x★ 18same name
- FaisalAlqarni/sp-ecc★ 9same name
- gongyijie85/dsh-ecc★ 8same name
- alexderz/agentic-toolbox★ 5same name
27 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository36 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- aif-architectureSkill
- aif-archiveSkill
- aif-best-practicesSkill
- aif-build-automationSkill
- aif-ciSkill
- aif-commitSkill
- aif-docsSkill
- aif-evolveSkill
- aif-exploreSkill
- aif-fixSkill
- aif-groundedSkill
- aif-implementSkill
- aif-improveSkill
- aif-loopSkill
- aif-planSkill
- aif-qa-checkSkill
- aif-qaSkill
- aif-reviewSkill
- aif-roadmapSkill
- aif-rules-checkSkill
- aif-rulesSkill
- aif-security-checklistSkill
- aif-skill-generatorSkill
- aifSkill
- aif-verifySkill
- golang-code-styleSkill
- golang-concurrencySkill
- golang-contextSkill
- golang-databaseSkill
- golang-design-patternsSkill
- golang-documentationSkill
- golang-error-handlingSkill
- golang-namingSkill
- golang-performanceSkill
- golang-securitySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 47 edited versions we read keep these.
12
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 57
Use testify as helpers, not a replacement for standard library
- Distinctive: line 59
Keep unit tests fast (< 1ms), use build tags for integration tests
- Distinctive: line 60
Run tests with race detection in CI
- Distinctive: line 62
Test files MUST be named after the source file under test, not after the function or method being tested
- Distinctive: line 63
Test functions SHOULD appear in the same order as the functions/methods they test in the source file
- Very specific: line 171
Verify with a deliberately-broken case: if go test -v -run TestName shows --- FAIL: TestName but every --- PASS: TestName/subtest_name line …
- Very specific: line 179
Use httptest for handler tests with table-driven patterns.
- Very specific: line 183
Use go.uber.org/goleak to detect leaking goroutines, especially for concurrent code:
- Very specific: line 219
When to use synctest instead of real time:
- Distinctive: line 222
When race conditions need to be reproducible
- Distinctive: line 223
When tests are flaky due to timing issues
- Very specific: line 255
Use synctest.Test in Go 1.25+ and later.
- Distinctive: line 261
All goroutines run to blocking points before time advances
- Distinctive: line 262
Test execution is deterministic and repeatable
- Very specific: line 273
Write benchmarks as sub-benchmarks (b.Run per variant) so each variant gets its own name in the output — that name is what comparison …
- Very specific: line 281
When a test, benchmark, or fuzz target needs to persist files for inspection, use ArtifactDir() instead of ad-hoc paths or repo-local …
- Very specific: line 304
Use t.Parallel() to run tests concurrently:
- Distinctive: line 330
Use fuzzing to find edge cases and bugs:
- Distinctive: line 362
Use build tags to separate integration tests from unit tests:
- Distinctive: line 380
Run integration tests separately:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 47 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior, not to hit coverage targets.
Thinking mode: Reason as thoroughly as possible for test strategy design and failure analysis — shallow reasoning misses edge cases and produces brittle tests that pass today but break tomorrow. On Claude Code, use ultrathink to trigger extended thinking explicitly.
Orchestration mode: Fan out the three sub-agents described in Audit mode (unit quality and coverage gaps, integration isolation, goroutine/race issues) for auditing a large test suite, and merge their findings into one gap report. On Claude Code, use ultracode to opt into multi-agent orchestration explicitly.
Modes:
- Write mode — generating new tests for existing or new code. Work sequentially through the code under test; use
goteststo scaffold table-driven tests, then enrich with edge cases and error paths. - Review mode — reviewing a PR's test changes. Focus on the diff: check coverage of new behaviour, assertion quality, table-driven structure, and absence of flakiness patterns. Sequential.
- Audit mode — auditing an existing test suite for gaps, flakiness, or bad patterns (order-dependent tests, missing
t.Parallel(), implementation-detail coupling). Launch up to 3 parallel sub-agents split by concern: (1) unit test quality and coverage gaps, (2) integration test isolation and build tags, (3) goroutine leaks and race conditions. - Debug mode — a test is failing or flaky. Work sequentially: reproduce reliably, isolate the failing assertion, trace the root cause in production code or test setup.
Community default. A company skill that explicitly supersedes
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testingskill takes precedence.
Dependencies:
- gotests:
go install github.com/cweill/gotests/gotests@latest
Go Testing Best Practices
This skill guides the creation of production-ready tests for Go applications. Follow these principles to write maintainable, fast, and reliable tests.
Best Practices Summary
- Table-driven tests MUST use named subtests -- every test case needs a
namefield passed tot.Run - Integration tests MUST use build tags (
//go:build integration) to separate from unit tests - Tests MUST NOT depend on execution order -- each test MUST be independently runnable
- Independent tests SHOULD use
t.Parallel()when possible - Tests MUST assert observable behavior and public API contracts, not implementation details -- a test coupled to internals turns every refactor into a test rewrite while proving nothing about the contract
- Packages with goroutines SHOULD use
goleak.VerifyTestMaininTestMainto detect goroutine leaks - Use testify as helpers, not a replacement for standard library
- Mock interfaces, not concrete types
- Keep unit tests fast (< 1ms), use build tags for integration tests
- Run tests with race detection in CI
- Include examples as executable documentation
- Test files MUST be named after the source file under test, not after the function or method being tested
- Test functions SHOULD appear in the same order as the functions/methods they test in the source file
Test Structure and Organization
File Conventions
// package_test.go - tests in same package (white-box, access unexported)
package mypackage
// mypackage_test.go - tests in test package (black-box, public API only)
package mypackage_testName the test file after the source file it tests, not after the function or method under test. Go's convention is one test file per source file (foo.go -> foo_test.go), because tools (go test, coverage reports, IDE "jump to test" navigation, gotests) and reviewers all resolve tests by source file, not by symbol. A source file usually declares several functions/methods; splitting its tests by symbol name scatters them across many files and breaks that file-to-file mapping.
// ✓ Good — one test file per source file
helloworld.go -> helloworld_test.go // contains TestHelloWorld, TestAbcd, TestXyz, ...
// ✗ Bad — test file named after the function/method instead of the source file
helloworld.go -> abcd_test.go // wrong: should be helloworld_test.goException: very large source files MAY be split into multiple _test.go files by concern (e.g. foo_test.go + foo_edgecases_test.go), but each split file's name MUST still be derived from the source file name, never from an individual function name. Prefer keeping a single _test.go file per source file even when it grows large — splitting adds navigation overhead and is rarely worth it; reach for the exception only when a single file becomes genuinely unwieldy to browse or review.
Within a test file, order test functions to match the order their tested functions/methods appear in the source file. A reader (human or agent) scrolling foo.go alongside foo_test.go can then find the matching test by position instead of searching; drift between the two orderings compounds every time either file grows.
Naming Conventions
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) { ... } // function test
func TestMyStruct_MyMethod(t *testing.T) { ... } // method test
func BenchmarkAdd(b *testing.B) { ... } // benchmark
func ExampleAdd() { ... } // example
func FuzzAdd(f *testing.F) { ... } // fuzz testTable-Driven Tests
Table-driven tests are the idiomatic Go way to test multiple scenarios. Always name each test case.
func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
quantity int
unitPrice float64
expected float64
}{
{
name: "single item",
quantity: 1,
unitPrice: 10.0,
expected: 10.0,
},
{
name: "bulk discount - 100 items",
quantity: 100,
unitPrice: 10.0,
expected: 900.0, // 10% discount
},
{
name: "zero quantity",
quantity: 0,
unitPrice: 10.0,
expected: 0.0,
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
got := CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice)
if got != tt.expected {
t.Errorf("CalculatePrice(%d, %.2f) = %.2f, want %.2f",
tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice, got, tt.expected)
}
})
}
}Common Pitfall: Assert Scope Leaking into Subtests
Never create a testify assert/require instance in the parent test function and reuse it inside t.Run closures. assert.New(t) captures the exact *testing.T it was built with, so if that t belongs to the parent, every failure raised inside the subtest gets attributed to the parent test in go test output — the failing subtest itself still reports --- PASS, silently hiding which case broke. This happens whether or not the subtest calls t.Parallel().
// WRONG -- `is` is bound to the parent's t
func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
is := assert.New(t)
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
is.Equal(tt.expected, CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice)) // misattributed on failure
})
}
}
// RIGHT -- each subtest builds its own instance from its own t
func TestCalculatePrice(t *testing.T) {
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
is := assert.New(t)
is.Equal(tt.expected, CalculatePrice(tt.quantity, tt.unitPrice))
})
}
}Verify with a deliberately-broken case: if go test -v -run TestName shows --- FAIL: TestName but every --- PASS: TestName/subtest_name line still says PASS, the assert scope is leaking.
Unit Tests
Unit tests should be fast (< 1ms), isolated (no external dependencies), and deterministic.
Testing HTTP Handlers
Use httptest for handler tests with table-driven patterns. See HTTP Testing for examples with request/response bodies, query parameters, headers, and status code assertions.
Goroutine Leak Detection with goleak
Use go.uber.org/goleak to detect leaking goroutines, especially for concurrent code:
import (
"testing"
"go.uber.org/goleak"
)
func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
goleak.VerifyTestMain(m)
}To exclude specific goroutine stacks (for known leaks or library goroutines):
func TestMain(m *testing.M) {
goleak.VerifyTestMain(m,
goleak.IgnoreCurrent(),
)
}Or per-test:
func TestWorkerPool(t *testing.T) {
defer goleak.VerifyNone(t)
// ... test code ...
}testing/synctest for Deterministic Goroutine Testing
testing/synctest (Go 1.25+) provides deterministic tests for goroutines, timers, deadlines, and context cancellation. Time advances only when all goroutines are blocked, making ordering predictable.
When to use synctest instead of real time:
- Testing concurrent code with time-based operations (time.Sleep, time.After, time.Ticker)
- When race conditions need to be reproducible
- When tests are flaky due to timing issues
import (
"context"
"testing"
"testing/synctest"
"time"
)
func TestContextTimeout(t *testing.T) {
synctest.Test(t, func(t *testing.T) {
const timeout = 5 * time.Second
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(t.Context(), timeout)
defer cancel()
time.Sleep(timeout - time.Nanosecond)
synctest.Wait()
if err := ctx.Err(); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("before timeout: %v", err)
}
time.Sleep(time.Nanosecond)
synctest.Wait()
if err := ctx.Err(); err != context.DeadlineExceeded {
t.Fatalf("after timeout: got %v, want DeadlineExceeded", err)
}
})
}Use synctest.Test in Go 1.25+ and later. Do not use the old Go 1.24 experimental synctest.Run API in Go 1.25+ code. If a module explicitly targets Go 1.24 and opts into GOEXPERIMENT=synctest, use the old API only as a compatibility fallback.
Key differences in synctest:
time.Sleepadvances synthetic time instantly when the goroutine blockstime.Afterfires when synthetic time reaches the duration- All goroutines run to blocking points before time advances
- Test execution is deterministic and repeatable
- Go 1.27+ adds
synctest.Sleep(d)as a direct helper to advance the bubble's fake clock, equivalent totime.Sleep(d)followed bysynctest.Wait()but without needing a real goroutine to block on
Go 1.27+ also adds httptest.NewTestServer(), an in-memory fake-network variant of httptest.NewServer that composes with synctest — no real socket, so server tests can run inside a synctest.Test bubble instead of needing httptest.NewServer plus real timers.
Test Timeouts
For tests that may hang, use a timeout helper that panics with caller location. See Helpers.
Benchmarks
Write benchmarks as sub-benchmarks (b.Run per variant) so each variant gets its own name in the output — that name is what comparison tooling diffs. For Go 1.24+, use b.Loop() rather than a b.N loop.
→ See Benchmarks in a Test Suite for the code shape and size-parameterized examples.
→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark skill for measurement methodology: benchstat, profiling from benchmarks, and CI regression detection.
Go 1.26+: test artifacts
When a test, benchmark, or fuzz target needs to persist files for inspection, use ArtifactDir() instead of ad-hoc paths or repo-local output.
func TestRenderGoldenArtifact(t *testing.T) {
dir := t.ArtifactDir()
out := filepath.Join(dir, "rendered.json")
if err := os.WriteFile(out, renderedBytes, 0o644); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
t.Logf("artifact written: %s", out)
}Available on *testing.T, *testing.B, and *testing.F in Go 1.26+.
Go 1.27+: stdversion runs automatically
go test now invokes the stdversion vet check by default, flagging any use of an API newer than the module's go directive. A CI failure from this check means either the go directive needs bumping or the code needs to stop using the newer API — it is not a check to silence.
Parallel Tests
Use t.Parallel() to run tests concurrently:
func TestParallelOperations(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
data []byte
}{
{"small data", make([]byte, 1024)},
{"medium data", make([]byte, 1024*1024)},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
is := assert.New(t)
result := Process(tt.data)
is.NotNil(result)
})
}
}Fuzzing
Use fuzzing to find edge cases and bugs:
func FuzzReverse(f *testing.F) {
f.Add("hello")
f.Add("")
f.Add("a")
f.Fuzz(func(t *testing.T, input string) {
reversed := Reverse(input)
doubleReversed := Reverse(reversed)
if input != doubleReversed {
t.Errorf("Reverse(Reverse(%q)) = %q, want %q", input, doubleReversed, input)
}
})
}Examples as Documentation
ExampleXxx functions are executable documentation: go test compares their stdout to the // Output: comment, so a drifting example fails the build instead of misleading readers.
→ See Examples as Documentation for naming rules, Unordered output, and placement.
Code Coverage
Generate a profile with go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./..., then read the uncovered lines with go tool cover -html=coverage.out. Coverage locates untested paths; it does not measure assertion quality, so treat a percentage as a gap finder rather than a target.
→ See Code Coverage for coverage modes, -coverpkg, and reporting pitfalls.
Integration Tests
Use build tags to separate integration tests from unit tests:
//go:build integration
package mypackage
func TestDatabaseIntegration(t *testing.T) {
db, err := sql.Open("postgres", os.Getenv("DATABASE_URL"))
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
defer db.Close()
// Test real database operations
}Run integration tests separately:
go test -tags=integration ./...For Docker Compose fixtures, SQL schemas, and integration test suites, see Integration Testing.
Mocking
Mock interfaces, not concrete types. Define interfaces where consumed, then create mock implementations.
For mock patterns, test fixtures, and time mocking, see Mocking.
Enforce with Linters
Many test best practices are enforced automatically by linters: thelper, paralleltest, testifylint. See the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lint skill for configuration and usage.
Cross-References
- → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-stretchr-testifyskill for detailed testify API (assert, require, mock, suite) - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-databaseskill (testing.md) for database integration test patterns - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrencyskill for goroutine leak detection with goleak - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integrationskill for CI test configuration and GitHub Actions workflows - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-lintskill for testifylint and paralleltest configuration - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-continuous-integrationskill for automated AI-driven code review in CI using these guidelines
Quick Reference
go test ./... # all tests
go test -run TestName ./... # specific test by exact name
go test -run TestName/subtest ./... # subtests within a test
go test -run 'Test(Add|Sub)' ./... # multiple tests (regexp OR)
go test -run 'Test[A-Z]' ./... # tests starting with capital letter
go test -run 'TestUser.*' ./... # tests matching prefix
go test -run '.*Validation.*' ./... # tests containing substring
go test -run TestName/. ./... # all subtests of TestName
go test -run '/(unit|integration)' ./... # filter by subtest name
go test -race ./... # race detection
go test -cover ./... # coverage summary
go test -bench=. -benchmem ./... # benchmarks
go test -fuzz=FuzzName ./... # fuzzing
go test -tags=integration ./... # integration testsDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

