agentleFS
unxedunxed/f4/.agents/skills/aif-commit/SKILL.md

aif-commit

Skill261 starsChanged 2 months agoBSD-3-ClauseView on GitHub

Create conventional commit messages by analyzing staged changes. Generates semantic commit messages following the Conventional Commits specification. Use when user says "commit", "save changes", or "create commit".

  • Commits and pushes

4 other projects use a version of this, 4 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

60 rules. 28 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 27 are very specific to this project.

  • 28

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 27

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Very specific:

    FIRST: Read .ai-factory/config.yaml if it exists to resolve:

    line 15
  2. Very specific:

    If config.yaml doesn't exist, use defaults:

    line 22
  3. Common:

    Treat them as project-level overrides for this skill's general instructions

    line 35
  4. Very specific:

    When a skill-context rule conflicts with a general rule written in this SKILL.md,

    line 36
  5. Very specific:

    When there is no conflict, apply both: general rules from SKILL.md + project rules from skill-context

    line 38
  6. Common:

    Do NOT ignore skill-context rules even if they seem to contradict this skill's defaults — they exist because the project's experience …

    line 39
  7. Common:

    Enforcement: After generating any output artifact, verify it against all skill-context rules.

    line 46
  8. Common:

    If any rule is violated — fix the output before presenting it to the user.

    line 47
  9. Common:

    Run git status to see staged files

    line 50
  10. Common:

    Run git diff --cached to see staged changes

    line 51
  11. Common:

    If nothing staged, show warning and suggest staging

    line 52
  12. Very specific:

    If the argument does not start with @, keep treating it as commit scope/context.

    line 60
  13. Very specific:

    when workflow.plan_id_format = sequential, use Glob for both paths.plans/[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]_<branch-stem>.md and …

    line 66
  14. Very specific:

    Read every directory candidate and retain it only when index.md contains exactly one <!-- aif:plan-mode:ultra -->

    line 69
  15. Very specific:

    use the highest-numbered valid artifact and emit WARN [aif-commit] when multiple valid candidates exist.

    line 71
  16. Very specific:

    if no valid sequential match exists, check paths.plans/<branch-stem>/index.md then paths.plans/<branch-stem>.md.

    line 74
  17. Very specific:

    If git mode is off, branch lookup cannot resolve, or no branch-based plan exists, count root *.md full plans plus direct child */index.md …

    line 79
  18. Very specific:

    Before normalizing an explicit ultra directory or treating an explicit index.md as ultra, Read it and require exactly one <!-- …

    line 83
  19. Very specific:

    If no active plan resolves or the active plan entrypoint has no ## Commit Plan, keep current staged-diff behavior unchanged.

    line 88
  20. Common:

    Never modify the active plan from this command.

    line 89
  21. Very specific:

    If active plan contains ## Commit Plan, parse:

    line 92
  22. Common:

    commit group number/name

    line 93
  23. Very specific:

    Read the plan's ## Tasks or ## Implementation Tasks section to map task ranges to task descriptions and any Files: hints.

    line 96
  24. Very specific:

    If one phase contains tasks from multiple commit groups, use the individual ## Task N sections to distinguish file/hunk ownership.

    line 101
  25. Common:

    use staged file paths from git diff --cached --name-only

    line 105
  26. Common:

    use staged hunk evidence from git diff --cached when a file may span multiple groups

    line 106
  27. Common:

    If files cannot be mapped to groups, stop and ask the user to adjust grouping.

    line 108
  28. Common:

    Before using whole-file staging, compare grouped files with unstaged worktree paths from git diff --name-only.

    line 109
  29. Very specific:

    Only use git add <files> when each planned group has a disjoint file set and no grouped file appears in git diff --name-only.

    line 110
  30. Common:

    When one file spans multiple planned groups, use hunk-level staging (git add -p or git apply --cached) for each group.

    line 111
  31. Common:

    If grouped files overlap unstaged worktree paths, preserve and apply the original cached patch per group (git diff --cached + git apply …

    line 112
  32. Distinctive:

    If hunk-level staging cannot be applied confidently, stop before changing staging and ask the user to adjust grouping or commit everything …

    line 113
  33. Common:

    When a usable grouping exists, ask:

    line 114
  34. Common:

    Check the resolved architecture and description artifacts (use paths from config) to catch obvious scope/boundary drift

    line 130
  35. Common:

    Check the resolved RULES.md and roadmap artifacts (use paths from config) to catch rule and milestone alignment issues

    line 131
  36. Very specific:

    Check rules hierarchy (resolved paths.rules_file + rules.base + named rules.<area>) for commit conventions

    line 132
  37. Common:

    Never modify context artifacts from this command

    line 134
  38. Very specific:

    If the user wants a standalone rules-only pass, suggest /aif-rules-check.

    line 135
  39. Common:

    Keep subject line under 72 characters

    line 155
  40. Common:

    Use imperative mood ("add" not "added")

    line 156
  41. Common:

    Don't capitalize first letter after type

    line 157
  42. Common:

    No period at end of subject

    line 158
  43. Common:

    Check for staged changes

    line 198
  44. Very specific:

    Run read-only context gates and summarize findings as WARN/ERROR

    line 201
  45. Very specific:

    If commit type is feat/fix/perf and roadmap exists, check milestone linkage.

    line 202
  46. Very specific:

    If git.skip_push_after_commit = true in resolved config:

    line 224
  47. Very specific:

    If the branch has no upstream, use: git push -u origin <branch>

    line 229
  48. Very specific:

    if branch has no upstream → git push -u origin <branch>

    line 241
  49. Very specific:

    If argument provided (e.g., /aif-commit auth):

    line 245
  50. Common:

    Use it as the scope

    line 246
  51. Common:

    Never commit secrets or credentials

    line 251
  52. Distinctive:

    Treat the resolved architecture, roadmap, RULES.md, description, and plan artifacts as read-only context in this command

    line 254
  53. Very specific:

    If no active plan resolves or the active plan has no ## Commit Plan, keep current staged-diff behavior unchanged.

    line 255
  54. Common:

    If staged changes contain unrelated work (e.g., a feature + a bugfix, or changes to independent modules), suggest splitting into separate …

    line 256
  55. Distinctive:

    Before changing staging, confirm whether each planned group has a disjoint file set, whether any file spans multiple groups, and whether …

    line 273
  56. Very specific:

    If every group has a disjoint file set and no grouped file appears in git diff --name-only, unstage all with git reset HEAD, then stage and …

    line 274
  57. Common:

    If grouped files overlap unstaged worktree paths, preserve each group's original cached patch before unstaging and re-apply only that patch …

    line 275
  58. Distinctive:

    If one file spans multiple groups, use hunk-level staging for each group: stage only that group's hunks with git add -p or git apply …

    line 276
  59. Distinctive:

    If hunk-level staging or cached-patch application cannot be applied confidently, stop before changing staging and ask the user to adjust …

    line 277
  60. Very specific:

    NEVER add Co-Authored-By or any other trailer attributing authorship to the AI.

    line 279

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Conventional Commit Generator

Generate commit messages following the Conventional Commits specification.

Workflow

FIRST: Read .ai-factory/config.yaml if it exists to resolve:

  • Paths: paths.description, paths.architecture, paths.rules_file, paths.roadmap, paths.rules, paths.plan, and paths.plans
  • Language: language.ui for prompts and commit message conventions
  • Workflow: workflow.plan_id_format for read-only active plan discovery (slug default; sequential uses numbered full-plan lookup)
  • Git preference: git.enabled, git.create_branches, and git.skip_push_after_commit for active plan discovery and post-commit push behavior
  • Rules hierarchy: rules.base plus any named rules.<area> entries

If config.yaml doesn't exist, use defaults:

  • Paths: .ai-factory/ for context artifacts, .ai-factory/PLAN.md for paths.plan, .ai-factory/plans/ for paths.plans
  • Language: en (English)
  • Workflow: workflow.plan_id_format: slug
  • Git: git.enabled: true, git.create_branches: true
  • Git preference: skip_push_after_commit: false

Read .ai-factory/skill-context/aif-commit/SKILL.md — MANDATORY if the file exists.

This file contains project-specific rules accumulated by /aif-evolve from patches, codebase conventions, and tech-stack analysis. These rules are tailored to the current project.

How to apply skill-context rules:

  • Treat them as project-level overrides for this skill's general instructions
  • When a skill-context rule conflicts with a general rule written in this SKILL.md, the skill-context rule wins (more specific context takes priority — same principle as nested CLAUDE.md files)
  • When there is no conflict, apply both: general rules from SKILL.md + project rules from skill-context
  • Do NOT ignore skill-context rules even if they seem to contradict this skill's defaults — they exist because the project's experience proved the default insufficient
  • CRITICAL: skill-context rules apply to ALL outputs of this skill — including the commit message format and conventions. If a skill-context rule says "commits MUST follow format X" or "message MUST include Y" — you MUST comply. Generating a commit message that violates skill-context rules is a bug.

Enforcement: After generating any output artifact, verify it against all skill-context rules. If any rule is violated — fix the output before presenting it to the user.

  1. Analyze Changes
    • Run git status to see staged files
    • Run git diff --cached to see staged changes
    • If nothing staged, show warning and suggest staging
  2. Resolve Active Plan Context (Read-Only, Optional)
    • Resolve active plan using this read-only priority:
      1. @<plan-file-or-directory> argument, when the argument starts with @
      2. branch-based full plan or ultra bundle in paths.plans
      3. single full plan in paths.plans, or a single ultra bundle there
      4. fast plan at paths.plan
    • If the argument does not start with @, keep treating it as commit scope/context.
    • Legacy @<plan-file> syntax remains valid; the broader form additionally accepts an ultra directory or its index.md.
    • For branch-based full plan lookup:
      • get current branch with git branch --show-current when git.enabled = true
      • replace every / with - to get <branch-stem>
      • when workflow.plan_id_format = sequential, use Glob for both paths.plans/[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]_<branch-stem>.md and paths.plans/[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]_<branch-stem>/index.md
      • Read every directory candidate and retain it only when index.md contains exactly one <!-- aif:plan-mode:ultra -->
      • use the highest-numbered valid artifact and emit WARN [aif-commit] when multiple valid candidates exist; if both shapes share the highest prefix, prefer ultra
      • if no valid sequential match exists, check paths.plans/<branch-stem>/index.md then paths.plans/<branch-stem>.md; Read the directory entrypoint before selection, ignore it unless it contains exactly one ultra marker, and warn and prefer ultra if both valid shapes exist
    • If git mode is off, branch lookup cannot resolve, or no branch-based plan exists, count root *.md full plans plus direct child */index.md entrypoints containing <!-- aif:plan-mode:ultra -->; exclude the resolved fast-plan path and do not count phase files.
    • Before normalizing an explicit ultra directory or treating an explicit index.md as ultra, Read it and require exactly one <!-- aif:plan-mode:ultra -->; otherwise STOP with a plan-integrity error.
    • An automatically discovered directory entrypoint counts only when it contains <!-- aif:plan-mode:ultra -->; ignore unrelated */index.md files.
    • If no active plan resolves or the active plan entrypoint has no ## Commit Plan, keep current staged-diff behavior unchanged.
    • Never modify the active plan from this command.
  3. Use Commit Plan Grouping When Available
    • If active plan contains ## Commit Plan, parse:
      • commit group number/name
      • task range, such as after tasks 1-3 or tasks 4-6
      • suggested conventional commit message
    • Read the plan's ## Tasks or ## Implementation Tasks section to map task ranges to task descriptions and any Files: hints.
    • For an ultra plan, resolve every task in the current commit group to its Phase Index/details link, read each corresponding phase file, and build the staged-path mapping from its ## Files to Change table plus the complete ## Task N specifications. Reading only index.md is insufficient.
    • If one phase contains tasks from multiple commit groups, use the individual ## Task N sections to distinguish file/hunk ownership; do not assign the phase's entire file table to every group without task-level evidence.
    • Compare staged files/hunks with planned groups before changing staging:
      • use staged file paths from git diff --cached --name-only
      • use staged hunk evidence from git diff --cached when a file may span multiple groups
      • task ranges and Files: hints are guidance, not executable instructions
    • If files cannot be mapped to groups, stop and ask the user to adjust grouping.
    • Before using whole-file staging, compare grouped files with unstaged worktree paths from git diff --name-only.
    • Only use git add <files> when each planned group has a disjoint file set and no grouped file appears in git diff --name-only.
    • When one file spans multiple planned groups, use hunk-level staging (git add -p or git apply --cached) for each group.
    • If grouped files overlap unstaged worktree paths, preserve and apply the original cached patch per group (git diff --cached + git apply --cached), use hunk-level staging, or stop before changing staging.
    • If hunk-level staging cannot be applied confidently, stop before changing staging and ask the user to adjust grouping or commit everything together.
    • When a usable grouping exists, ask:

      AskUserQuestion: Active plan contains a Commit Plan. How should these staged changes be committed?
      
      Options:
      1. Follow Commit Plan
      2. Commit everything together
      3. Adjust grouping
    • Follow Commit Plan → confirm the planned groups and messages, then proceed through user-confirmed multi-commit staging/commit flow.
    • Commit everything together → ignore plan grouping for this run and continue with the current single-message flow.
    • Adjust grouping → ask the user for the adjusted grouping, then validate it against staged files before committing.
  4. Run Context Gates (Read-Only)
    • Check the resolved architecture and description artifacts (use paths from config) to catch obvious scope/boundary drift
    • Check the resolved RULES.md and roadmap artifacts (use paths from config) to catch rule and milestone alignment issues
    • Check rules hierarchy (resolved paths.rules_file + rules.base + named rules.<area>) for commit conventions
    • Missing optional files (ROADMAP.md, RULES.md) are WARN, not blockers
    • Never modify context artifacts from this command
    • If the user wants a standalone rules-only pass, suggest /aif-rules-check; keep /aif-commit gate labels at WARN / ERROR
  5. Determine Commit Type
    • feat: New feature
    • fix: Bug fix
    • docs: Documentation only
    • style: Code style (formatting, semicolons)
    • refactor: Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
    • perf: Performance improvement
    • test: Adding or modifying tests
    • build: Build system or dependencies
    • ci: CI configuration
    • chore: Maintenance tasks
  6. Identify Scope
    • From file paths (e.g., src/auth/ → auth)
    • From argument if provided
    • Optional - omit if changes span multiple areas
  7. Generate Message
    • Keep subject line under 72 characters
    • Use imperative mood ("add" not "added")
    • Don't capitalize first letter after type
    • No period at end of subject

Format

<type>(<scope>): <subject>

<body>

<footer>

Examples

Simple feature:

feat(auth): add password reset functionality

Bug fix with body:

fix(api): handle null response from payment gateway

The payment API can return null when the gateway times out.
Added null check and retry logic.

Fixes #123

Breaking change:

feat(api)!: change response format for user endpoint

BREAKING CHANGE: user endpoint now returns nested profile object

Behavior

When invoked:

  1. Check for staged changes
  2. Analyze the diff content
  3. Resolve optional active plan context and use ## Commit Plan grouping when available
  4. Run read-only context gates and summarize findings as WARN/ERROR
  5. If commit type is feat/fix/perf and roadmap exists, check milestone linkage; if missing, warn and suggest adding linkage in commit body/footer
  6. Propose a commit message
  7. Confirm with the user before committing:

    AskUserQuestion: Proposed commit message:
    
    <type>(<scope>): <subject>
    
    Options:
    1. Commit as is
    2. Edit message
    3. Cancel
  8. Handle user response:
    • Commit as is → proceed to step 9
    • Edit message → ask the user for the corrected message via AskUserQuestion, then return to step 7 with the new message
    • Cancel → stop, do NOT commit. End the workflow
  9. Execute git commit with the confirmed message
  10. Post-commit push handling:
  • If git.skip_push_after_commit = true in resolved config:
    • Skip push prompt entirely
    • End workflow after successful local commit
  • Otherwise (default behavior), offer to push:

    • Show branch/ahead status: git status -sb
    • If the branch has no upstream, use: git push -u origin <branch>
    • Otherwise: git push
    AskUserQuestion: Push to remote?
    
    Options:
    1. Push now
    2. Skip push
    • Push now → execute push command based on upstream status:
      • if branch has no upstream → git push -u origin <branch>
      • otherwise → git push
    • Skip push → end the workflow

If argument provided (e.g., /aif-commit auth):

  • Use it as the scope
  • Or as context for the commit message

Important

  • Never commit secrets or credentials
  • Review large diffs carefully before committing
  • /aif-commit has no implicit strict mode — context gates are warning-first unless user explicitly requests blocking behavior
  • Treat the resolved architecture, roadmap, RULES.md, description, and plan artifacts as read-only context in this command
  • If no active plan resolves or the active plan has no ## Commit Plan, keep current staged-diff behavior unchanged.
  • If staged changes contain unrelated work (e.g., a feature + a bugfix, or changes to independent modules), suggest splitting into separate commits:
    1. Show which files/hunks belong to which commit
    2. Confirm split plan with the user:

      AskUserQuestion: Split into separate commits?
      
      Options:
      1. Yes, split as suggested
      2. No, commit everything together
      3. Let me adjust the grouping
    3. Handle user response:
      • Yes, split as suggested → proceed to step 4
      • No, commit everything together → proceed to step 5 (propose single commit message)
      • Let me adjust the grouping → ask the user for the adjusted grouping via AskUserQuestion, then return to step 2 with the new plan
    4. Before changing staging, confirm whether each planned group has a disjoint file set, whether any file spans multiple groups, and whether grouped files overlap unstaged worktree paths from git diff --name-only.
    5. If every group has a disjoint file set and no grouped file appears in git diff --name-only, unstage all with git reset HEAD, then stage and commit each group separately using git add <files> + git commit.
    6. If grouped files overlap unstaged worktree paths, preserve each group's original cached patch before unstaging and re-apply only that patch with git apply --cached; otherwise use hunk-level staging or stop before changing staging.
    7. If one file spans multiple groups, use hunk-level staging for each group: stage only that group's hunks with git add -p or git apply --cached, commit, then repeat for the next group.
    8. If hunk-level staging or cached-patch application cannot be applied confidently, stop before changing staging and ask the user to adjust grouping or commit everything together.
    9. Offer to push only after all commits are done
  • NEVER add Co-Authored-By or any other trailer attributing authorship to the AI. Commits must not contain AI co-author lines

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.